Skip to main content
Vote NO on HB2610

Vote NO on HB2610

80 signatures 20 to reach 100
J
Jenelle M. signed
S
Scott M. signed
M
Mark H. signed
P
Pam H. signed
N
Nora C. signed
C
Carole A. signed
M
M D. signed
R
Robert Y. signed
E
Elsie W. signed
J
Johanna R. signed
Started by Anonymous 14 years, 5 months ago

To The members of the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Tribal Relations, & Elections:

 Craig Pridemore  [email protected]  Chair - democrat              (360)786-7696

 Margarita Prentice [email protected]  Vice Chair - democrat (360)786-7616

 Dan Swecker    [email protected]  Ranking - republican               (360)786-7638

 Don Benton      [email protected] -  republican                            (360)786-7632

 Maralyn Chase    [email protected] -  democrat                        (360)786-7662

 Sharon Nelson    [email protected] -  democrat                         (360)786-7667

 Pam Roach        [email protected] - republican                              (360)786-7660


We the undersigned request that you vote NO on HB2610.

Reasons for a vote against House Bill 2610 include:

 

1. The State should not abrogate/rescind an agreement that was the critical inducement for the city of Houghton to abandon its autonomy and merge with the city of Kirkland in 1968.

 

2. The State should not involve itself in a local issue with legislation that has not been requested or supported by the Kirkland City Council.  There has been no public outcry for this legislation. 

 

3. Houghton Community Municipal Corporation has worked very effectively with Kirkland's city council and staff for over forty years.  


4. The state already has a process in RCW 35.14 that can terminate the Municipal Corporation by a public vote every four years.  There has never been any concerted effort made to influence a public vote to terminate the Municipal Corporation.

 

5. Courts have held “Procedural due process requires notice which

is reasonably calculated under the circumstances to apprise affected parties of

pending action and to afford them an opportunity to present their objections.”

[Version 3.1 Planning Association of Washington. Page 4-2.]  

 No notice has been given to the citizens of Houghton or Kirkland, and enacting HB 2610 would deprive property owners of a right previously enjoyed. At minimum, personal

notice and hearing are required.


Updates

February 11, 2012

Reaching this level of support has been a long haul and I am genuinely moved by the turnout. It has been exhausting to keep this moving but your backing gives me a reason to stay in the fight.

6 Comments

D
David Holmes
14 years ago Featured

VOTE NO!!! Why is this even being considered???

J
Jennifer Marquez
14 years ago Featured

please listen to the people for once instead of pushing your own agendas. vote no on hb2610

S
Sarah Owens
14 years ago Featured

This bill is a total joke. Leave it alone and focus on things that actually matter

M
Michelle Coleman
14 years ago Featured

Enough with these ridiculous bills. stop wasting our time and money on this nonsense.

K
Kevin Fisher
14 years ago Featured

Bad idea. Seriously bad idea. Keep your hands off.

M
Mark Wallace
14 years ago Featured

So tired of this state gov always trying to sneak stuff like this past us. NO.

Help this petition grow

Share it with friends to help reach 100 signatures.

Sign Petition

We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.

or sign with Email

Add a comment?

Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.

By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Share Petition

Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact

Copy link or share directly

Instagram
QR Code