Community Voice Against Port Side Boat & RV Storag

Signatures 30 total

Page: 1

1. 1
   Name: Paul Welton on Sep 6, 2007

   Comments: say to rezoning

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Brigette Welton on Sep 6, 2007

   Comments: Protect our community, our environment, and our safety! This does not add value to Chatham County or the area residents. Thanks for considering and supporting your residents.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Paul Welton on Sep 6, 2007

   Comments: Say NO to rezoning!!!!!

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Barbara Runyan on Sep 7, 2007

   Comments: This will be a detriment to our neighborhood and the surrounding community. I am very concerned about the traffic and u-turns on Highway 64 in front of Builders First Source and the Heritage Point/Deer Run neighborhoods. In addition, our neighborhood obtains water from underground wells - and it is not feasible to add additional wells to support a commerical enterprise.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Brigette Welton on Sep 7, 2007

   Comments: Protect our community, our environment, and our safety! This type of facility does not add value or generate income for Chatham County or the area residents who will be forced to deal with little buffer, added well worries, groundwater contaminants from the run-off, and the unsightly design of having a commercial property ajacent to our community. Thanks for considering and supporting your residents.

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Paul Welton on Sep 7, 2007

   Comments: Say NO to rezoning!!!!!

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Brigette Welton on Sep 7, 2007

   Comments: Protect our community, our environment, and our safety! This type of facility does not add value or generate income for Chatham County. Just as important, it will have a negative impact on the area residents who will be forced to deal with no buffer, added well water worries, groundwater contaminants seeping into our ground from the run-off, and the unsightly design of having a commercial property ajacent to our community. Thanks for considering and supporting your residents.

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Leslie Ewald on Sep 8, 2007

   Comments: I agree completely the points in the above petition. There are adequate storage facilities in the county already.

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Douglas Ewald on Sep 8, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Burton And Dolores Carnegie on Sep 9, 2007

    Comments: On Saturday, September 9, 2007, we received notification of a proposal to change residential rezoning. This rezoning proposal would change zoning from RA-40 to CU-B1. Chatham Development Corporation (developer of Heritage Pointe and no longer associated with the community) proposes to erect a large boat, recreational vehicle, trailer, and other vehicle storage facility across from Heritage Pointe, on Highway 64. This facility will have open and closed bays and will probably look like the eyesore storage facilities now on the south side of Route 64 in Chatham County. To discover that the developer of Heritage Pointe proposes to construct another similar facility for their profit and gain is unconscionable. We see no reason for the Chatham County Board of Commissioners to approve another similar storage facility and provide unsightly surroundings as soon as you enter Chatham County from Wake County on Highway 64 West. We strongly object to the continual degeneration of the environment in the county and the likely impact of residential property valuation. The residents of Deer Run and Heritage Pointe purchased large residential tracts expecting Chatham County to work toward a pleasant and beautiful residential community of homes for its citizens. We request that the Chatham County Board of Commissioners deny this rezoning request based upon the impact it places directly on the two major residential communities that lie in the immediate area entering Chatham County on Highway 64 West.

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Burton And Dolores Carnegie on Sep 9, 2007

    Comments: On Saturday, September 9, 2007, we received notification of a proposal to change residential rezoning. This rezoning proposal would change zoning from RA-40 to CU-B1. Chatham Development Corporation (developer of Heritage Pointe and no longer associated with the community) proposes to erect a large boat, recreational vehicle, trailer, and other vehicle storage facility across from Heritage Pointe, on Highway 64. This facility will have open and closed bays and will probably look like the eyesore storage facilities now on the south side of Route 64 in Chatham County. To discover that the developer of Heritage Pointe proposes to construct another similar facility for their profit and gain is unconscionable. We see no reason for the Chatham County Board of Commissioners to approve another similar storage facility and provide unsightly surroundings as soon as you enter Chatham County from Wake County on Highway 64 West. We strongly object to the continual degeneration of the environment in the county and the likely impact of residential property valuation. The residents of Deer Run and Heritage Pointe purchased large residential tracts expecting Chatham County to work toward a pleasant and beautiful residential community of homes for its citizens. We request that the Chatham County Board of Commissioners deny this rezoning request based upon the impact it places directly on the two major residential communities that lie in the immediate area entering Chatham County on Highway 64 West.

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Krystn M Messer on Sep 10, 2007

    Comments: Chatham County should NOT line all the major corridors into the county with unsightly storage facilities. Doing so will not attract new home development nor businesses that provide more than a handful of minimum wage jobs. Please deny the rezoning request.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Bob Messer on Sep 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Pete & Penny Beal on Sep 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Eric Runyan on Sep 13, 2007

    Comments: I am concerned about the affect that this facility will have on our wells and our wells!!!

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: David & Cynthia Gigandet on Sep 18, 2007

    Comments: There was a study conducted by the county that resulted in a zoning of RA-40 (Residential). This proposal for a storage facility would certainly not provide any benefits that would justify re-zoning. Re-zoning will neither help the county (no real revenue improvement, creation of jobs, social enhancement or beautification) or the surrounding communities. We need further residential development in this area, as there is far too much commerical/business development already. The request to re-zone should be denied.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Stuart Higgins on Sep 18, 2007

    Comments: I am against the rezoning.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Barbara And Nelson Cooper on Sep 18, 2007

    Comments: We are highley opposed to this property being rezoned. This property is zoned for residentail and should remain so. There is already far to much of this type of business along 64. Do not pentalize those who own residential property in the neighborhood by forcing additional unwanted and unnecessary business development. We have bought residential property in the area to get away from this. To the county commisioners, keep your committment that this be residential. Please turn down the rezoning request.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Randy Huiss on Sep 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Cathy Sayre on Sep 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Joanne G. Woodard on Sep 19, 2007

    Comments: The zoning shouild not be changed from RA-40 to conditional use B-1 for the reasons stated in the petition.

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 19, 2007

    Comments: I64 around the Heritage Pointe neighborhood is turning into downscale commercial development. It does nothing to improve property values for our neighborhood. This was zoned for residential and should remain residential--PERIOD!

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 19, 2007

    Comments: NO MORE STORAGE FACILITIES!!!

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 19, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Sooja K. Kim on Sep 20, 2007

    Comments: I petition to oppose the rezoning.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Craig Andersch on Sep 20, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Shi Liu And Jing Zhang on Sep 30, 2007

    Comments: We oppose the rezoning and do not want a boat/RV storage facility surround our residential community.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Gordon Koltis on Sep 30, 2007

    Comments: I respectfully wish to oppose the request for rezoning for all of the reasons outlined above

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Jim And Brenda Stutts on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments: We are very concerned with the impact of this project as it relates to traffic, noise, light polution and especially the impact on the water table in our area.

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Jim And Brenda Stutts on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments: We are very concerned with the impact of this project as it relates to traffic, noise, light polution and especially the impact on the water table in our area.

    Flag

Page: 1