Signatures 418 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 9 › »
-
151
Name: Rhiannon Grayson on Mar 8, 2003State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
152
Name: Richard Oviatt on Mar 9, 2003State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
153
Name: Richard Oviatt on Mar 9, 2003State:Country: CAComments:Flag
-
154
Name: Doesnt Matter on Mar 9, 2003State: VACountry: CAComments:Flag
-
155
Name: Jamie Tromp on Mar 10, 2003State:Country: CAComments:Flag
-
156
Name: Kait Sweetnam on Mar 10, 2003State:Country: CAComments: I am not sure how to o aproach this new i dea. i live in B.C and i think that we should host it in a bigger Province. B.Cs economy in already suffering enough from other things. And Most residents here won^t be able to afford the higher gas prices or any other inconvinience. My father has just been layed off from his job og 20 years that has to say something.Flag
-
157
Name: Kait Sweetnam on Mar 10, 2003State:Country: CAComments: I am not sure how to o aproach this new i dea. i live in B.C and i think that we should host it in a bigger Province. B.Cs economy in already suffering enough from other things. And Most residents here won^t be able to afford the higher gas prices or any other inconvinience. My father has just been layed off from his job og 20 years that has to say something.Flag
-
158
Name: Kait Sweetnam on Mar 10, 2003State:Country: CAComments: I am not sure how to o aproach this new i dea. i live in B.C and i think that we should host it in a bigger Province. B.Cs economy in already suffering enough from other things. And Most residents here won^t be able to afford the higher gas prices or any other inconvinience. My father has just been layed off from his job of 20 years that has to say something.Flag
-
159
Name: Phoebe Sue on Mar 10, 2003State: FLCountry: USComments: go vancouver goFlag
-
160
Name: Kevin Basanti on Mar 11, 2003State:Country: CAComments:Flag
-
161
Name: Kevin Basanti on Mar 11, 2003State:Country: CAComments: USA sux assholeFlag
-
162
Name: Allison Crosby on Mar 11, 2003State:Country: CAComments: I am a student from a Northen Community in British Columbia and I do not think that the Olympics will benifit us. The tourism will occur only in Vancouver and southern towns. I believe that the government should be spending our tax money on important matters such as health care and education.Flag
-
163
Name: Lena Brockhoff on Mar 13, 2003State:Country: CAComments: I think that Vancouver should not hold the Olympics, if they cannot afford it. Why should the rest of B.C have to pay for it Many people would rather have their hard earned money spent on health care, education, or social services.Flag
-
164
Name: Tracy Gonsalves on Mar 16, 2003State:Country: CAComments: Olympic vote not fair to lower mainland residents who were not included in the vote...healthcare before olympics!!!!!Flag
-
165
Name: Daniel Smith on Mar 19, 2003State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
166
Name: Daniel Smith on Mar 19, 2003State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
167
Name: Louisa Patterson on Mar 19, 2003State:Country: CAComments:Flag
-
168
Name: Dana Way on Mar 26, 2003State:Country: CAComments: You go Vancouver!!! We want the O'sFlag
-
169
Name: Darren Rokos on Mar 26, 2003State:Country: CAComments:Flag
-
170
Name: Chris Davy on Mar 27, 2003State:Country: CAComments: The Olympics, will have a greater economic benifit in the long run, even though there may be finainical loss to start off with.Flag
-
171
Name: Yvan Lavoie on Mar 28, 2003State:Country: CAComments: The olympics are a waste of money because no recent olympics have made money. Our country does not need any more debts.Flag
-
172
Name: Evan Doner on Apr 1, 2003State: SDCountry: USComments: YAY Vancouver need the olympics cuz Van rocks and I like the canucksFlag
-
173
Name: Dfgdfg Fsggssgg on Apr 3, 2003State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
174
Name: Heath Galenzoski on Apr 6, 2003State: PACountry: USComments:Flag
-
175
Name: Jordie Johnson on Apr 9, 2003State:Country: CAComments: The olympics will only benefit the people of the lower mainland in the terms that they call benefits to the province of BCFlag
-
176
Name: Robby Frankel on Apr 9, 2003State:Country: CAComments: go canadaFlag
-
177
Name: Peter Olson on Apr 12, 2003State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
178
Name: Alexander Hosner on Apr 16, 2003State:Country: CAComments: coolFlag
-
179
Name: Hugh Jass on Apr 17, 2003State:Country: CAComments: yeaaFlag
-
180
Name: Corina Fruendt on Apr 22, 2003State:Country: CAComments: i think money wise the olympics makes good senseFlag
-
181
Name: Corina Fruendt on Apr 22, 2003State:Country: CAComments: i think money wise the olympics makes good senseFlag
-
182
Name: Laurissa Dube on Apr 23, 2003State: CTCountry: CAComments:Flag
-
183
Name: Ip Freely on Apr 27, 2003State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
184
Name: Paul Cikatricis on Apr 30, 2003State:Country: SKComments: Go Canada, Go!Flag
-
185
Name: Chad Kelly on May 2, 2003State:Country: CAComments: Yes i choose Vancouver becuase of its beautiful scenery, although the city has alot of drug use. But what major city doesnt.Flag
-
186
Name: Heather Iverson on May 7, 2003State:Country: CAComments: you don' t have British columbia for one of your states you idiots !Flag
-
187
Name: G D on May 9, 2003State: COCountry: CAComments: noneFlag
-
188
Name: G D on May 9, 2003State: COCountry: CAComments: noneFlag
-
189
Name: Cordoviz Jon on May 10, 2003State:Country: CAComments: It would be awsome to have the olympics here in 2010. I will be good for Vancouver and for us to host the world in such a significant part of history.Flag
-
190
Name: Grant Morrison on May 11, 2003State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
191
Name: Grant Morrison on May 11, 2003State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
192
Name: Greg Jones on May 15, 2003State:Country: CAComments:Flag
-
193
Name: Rose Jang on May 16, 2003State:Country: CAComments:Flag
-
194
Name: Dave Eaton on Jun 20, 2003State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
195
Name: Kenneth Chan on Jun 20, 2003State:Country: CAComments:Flag
-
196
Name: Sarah Baldry on Jun 23, 2003State:Country: CAComments: There will be a temporary increase in jobs but that will soon decrease again.. Look at what happened with Expo 86.. its a waste of money that we could spend elsewhereFlag
-
197
Name: Steve V on Jun 24, 2003State: NJCountry: USComments:Flag
-
198
Name: Andrea Hall on Jun 24, 2003State:Country: CAComments:Flag
-
199
Name: Hasit Joshi on Jun 24, 2003State:Country:Comments: It has an immense potential to turn up the economy, even higher than ever possibly thought of. Trust me. It's an economist saying!Flag
-
200
Name: Jim Little on Jun 25, 2003State:Country: CAComments: I support the bid 100%Flag