Signatures 47 total
Page: 1
-
1
Name: Georgia Page on Oct 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Bill Hoffmann on Oct 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Georgia Page on Oct 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Page Rosenberb on Oct 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Stephen Marvin on Oct 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Don Allred on Oct 16, 2007Comments: Only after you have paved over and developed the last agricultural area of this town will you realize that you cannot eat condos, greenbuilt or otherwise.Flag
-
7
Name: Jeanne Denver on Oct 19, 2007Comments: No agricultural, Greenspace, Irrigated or wetlands should ever be developed, particularly when ther are acequias present, whether in use at this time or not.Flag
-
8
Name: Alicia Norling on Oct 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Ken Sandoval on Oct 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Daniel Huthcison on Oct 20, 2007Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Deborah Larson on Oct 22, 2007Comments: Just say NOFlag
-
12
Name: David Ternlund on Oct 26, 2007Comments: Change, growth, development are not the enemy. But it needs to be at the pace of the space it is in; The character of the place, in this case the valley floor of Taos Valley, is the absolutely wrong place for a 28 unit development which over night will spill traffic and tax infrastructure in the area. Please don't let it happen.Flag
-
13
Name: David Ternlund on Oct 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: David Ternlund on Oct 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Conrad Bookout on Oct 27, 2007Comments: please stop the destruction of taos by developers!Flag
-
16
Name: Barbara L. Scott on Oct 30, 2007Comments: Developers who wish to make money in the short run are destroying pastures from Taos's ecosystem forever. For God's sake...let's not pave over all of Taos, especially not land that is zoned for agriculture.Flag
-
17
Name: Louise Taylor on Nov 4, 2007Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Steven Falconer on Nov 5, 2007Comments: Let's preserve this place. There is more than enough development going on in this county..Flag
-
19
Name: Jeff Cochran on Nov 5, 2007Comments: I am an organic farmer in Talpa and I want to see agricultural land remain agricultural. There are other places to develope.Flag
-
20
Name: Amy Mortier on Nov 5, 2007Comments: do not want to see agricultural lands destroyed with housing development. We need more public housing in the right places.Flag
-
21
Name: Liana Sonne on Nov 5, 2007Comments: do not want to see agricultural lands destroyed with housing development. We need more public housing in the right places.Flag
-
22
Name: Anonymous on Nov 8, 2007Comments: It has been fourteen years since I was last in Taos. The sprawl and development of this valley is shocking. Please halt this development that is located at such a crucial juncture for the future of your aquifer.Flag
-
23
Name: Anonymous on Nov 8, 2007Comments: It has been fourteen years since I was last in Taos. The sprawl and development of this valley is shocking. Please halt this development that is located at such a crucial juncture for the future of your aquifer.Flag
-
24
Name: Anonymous on Nov 8, 2007Comments: Saving this land is critical in multiple ways. In my mind the most important is the protection of the water supply. Please consider water when coming to a decision on this matter.Flag
-
25
Name: Harriet Peterson on Nov 8, 2007Comments: We need to protect our ground water supply at all times. We do this for the good of all. This new development would do neither of the above.Flag
-
26
Name: Erica Lannon on Nov 21, 2007Comments: The trends being set in these recent years regarding high density development in Taos County are scary to say the least. I left Taos a year and a half ago because I couldn't stand to watch our fragile ecosystem so blatantly destroyed....not to mention the issues of traffic and water availability!! Now I am back because I want to be more active in saving the Taos that I once knew and still love. Please listen, we can find other ways to bring money into the community and still preserve a good quality of life!Flag
-
27
Name: Shawn Ludwig on Nov 21, 2007Comments: this is a fragile ecology that will blatantly be destroyed...this is vital agricultural land and should be used as such...Flag
-
28
Name: Gail Raborn on Nov 23, 2007Comments: Please protect the beautiful rural land off Valverde St; a housing development here would be obscene, ugly, and set a terrible precedent for other development in the Taos area. We need every bit of agricultural land in and around Taos kept agricultural for countless reason. Don't help destroy Taos, just to please the greedy developers. Destroying Tao's soul isn't worth any money that'll come in from building new homes.Flag
-
29
Name: Erin Greenberg on Nov 27, 2007Comments: I left a glamorous wealthy lifesyle behind me when I moved to taos 15 years ago.I chose Taos because of its natural preservation and for its inhabitants who have lived forever in close relationship with nature.I value nothing more than to maintain the open spaces and our ties with agriculture and farming.My simple beautiful valley has become daily scarred by the greed of developers.It is no longer dark and beautiful at night or as charming in the day.Nothing is a better investment than open spaces .We must farm more not less. This little valley always fed itself in the past.We need to depend less on shipments of trucked in foods. Developers requesting to upzone agricultural lands in our town should upzone their own fannys to the real estate fire sales n San Diego or Detroit or New york.Flag
-
30
Name: Anonymous on Dec 11, 2007Comments: PLEASE PLEASE don't build in that beatiful field. It is so beautiful! I admire it every day, every season and every time I pass by on my way to town. It would be a tremendous pity to destroy Mother Nature in such a way. This is what makes Taos so special. Natural aspects that takes everyone's breath away. Preserve the natural beauty and this allows Taos to remain as breathtaking as it is.Flag
-
31
Name: Simone Esquibel on Dec 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Joni Dunn on Dec 11, 2007Comments: As a residnet of Taos for almost 30 years this particular field has always been on eof my favorites. It is beautiful. Rezoning and allwoing for development would greatly impact one of the areas of town that make it rural. I strongly oppose this.Flag
-
33
Name: Josie Lenwell on Dec 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: NOEL STONE on Dec 12, 2007Comments: Once the open spaces of Taos are gone, they are gone FOREVER!!!Flag
-
35
Name: Molley MacCracken on Dec 12, 2007Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Katia Torrelli-delgado on Dec 12, 2007Comments: do not put aynore condos in this beautiful town ithey are viruses that invite suburbiaFlag
-
37
Name: Anonymous on Dec 12, 2007Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: MacLaren Scott on Dec 12, 2007Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Antonia Fahrney on Dec 14, 2007Comments: This project would set a devastating precedent of invading farmland which now not only creates the very distinctive character of Taos but also holds energies of well-being which would be for ever destroyed. Also, would this huge sacrifice be made for a lived in community or another community that stands empty for most of the yearFlag
-
40
Name: Anonymous on Jan 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Anonymous on Jan 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Linda Griffin on Jan 23, 2008Comments: save our agricultural landsFlag
-
43
Name: Marcia Burden on Jan 25, 2008Comments: Some of my objections are expressed in "My Turn", Taos News, January 24-30, 2008, a copy of which you will find in your Valverde Commons file.Flag
-
44
Name: Bill Burden on Jan 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Anonymous on Jan 28, 2008Comments: By signing this petition I do give permission for my e-mail address to be used/sold/or distributed in any way and is included for the sole purpose in support of this petition.Flag
-
46
Name: Melissa Mallams on Feb 3, 2008Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Steven Price on Feb 3, 2008Comments:Flag
Page: 1