'SAVE UNDERSHAW' the former residence of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Signatures 620 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 › »

1. 551
   Name: Carol Brown on Mar 16, 2010

   Comments: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and his works are part of our valuable heritage. This property should NOT be split into flats!

   Flag
2. 552
   Name: Dr. Kerry Schofield on Mar 16, 2010

   Comments: Undershaw is a piece of history, and the museum could easily turn a considerably profit. There are Sherlock Holmes fans all over the world, and Holmesians are well known for their pilgrimages to locations associated with Holmes and his creator. To knock Undershaw down would be an outrage not only against history and literature, but against common sense, as well; an appalling example of gross intellectual barbarism, and a missed opportunity.

   Flag
3. 553
   Name: Michael Procter MA LRAM ARCM FRSA on Mar 16, 2010

   Comments: This opportunity should not be wasted.

   Flag
4. 554
   Name: Sophie Clarke on Mar 16, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 555
   Name: Axxbwlzzdye on Mar 16, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 556
   Name: Sally Sugarman on Mar 17, 2010

   Comments: Opening it as a museum would get many tourists and would not only be of service to the literary world, but would probably generate more income. History needs to be preserved which is usually done better in Great Britain than anywhere else.

   Flag
7. 557
   Name: Patricia Gordon Michael on Mar 17, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 558
   Name: Ewan Tristan Booth on Mar 17, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 559
   Name: Ian Anderson on Mar 17, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 560
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 17, 2010

    Comments: save it as a museum

    Flag
11. 561
    Name: Lesley Johnson on Mar 17, 2010

    Comments: Please save this culturally and historically important house by restoring it and preserving it for the promotion of information on the legacy of the great Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Interest in his writings has never waned, and is renewed with each generation of young readers, whose love for his characters stays with them into adulthood. Please save Undershaw!

    Flag
12. 562
    Name: Fay Williams on Mar 17, 2010

    Comments: It would be a disgrace for this building to be developed.It is of great historical importance and part of our heritage.It should be restored,preserved and protected for future generations.Why is it not listed!

    Flag
13. 563
    Name: Jenny on Mar 17, 2010

    Comments: Save heritage! You can build apartments anywhere, but you can't restore heritage once it's gone.

    Flag
14. 564
    Name: Michael Yencho on Mar 17, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 565
    Name: Verity Woodfield on Mar 18, 2010

    Comments: Save undershaw for future genrations.

    Flag
16. 566
    Name: Emma Williamson on Mar 18, 2010

    Comments: 'Save Undershaw for future generations

    Flag
17. 567
    Name: Megan on Mar 18, 2010

    Comments: 'Save Undershaw for future generations.'

    Flag
18. 568
    Name: Marc Taylor on Mar 18, 2010

    Comments: Great work is being done in Hindhead with the re-routing of the A3. Do not spoil it by giving consent to the destruction of this historic building.

    Flag
19. 569
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 18, 2010

    Comments: Save undershaw for future generations!

    Flag
20. 570
    Name: Jaime Daniells on Mar 18, 2010

    Comments: Please Save Undershaw for Future Generations!

    Flag
21. 571
    Name: Arlyne K,, Luloff on Mar 18, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 572
    Name: Robert Sugarman on Mar 18, 2010

    Comments: For all the pleasure his writing has given me, I feel it important that Doyle's memory be honored in this way.

    Flag
23. 573
    Name: Emma Higham on Mar 18, 2010

    Comments: Save Undershaw for future generations.

    Flag
24. 574
    Name: Stephen Seitz on Mar 18, 2010

    Comments: This is an important site for the world's literary heritage, and deserves far, far better than its fate thus far.

    Flag
25. 575
    Name: Mara Certic on Mar 18, 2010

    Comments: Save Undershaw for future generations of Doylians.

    Flag
26. 576
    Name: GazzaJAnimal on Mar 19, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 577
    Name: Peter Gordon on Mar 19, 2010

    Comments: The reason of why Undershaw is called Undershaw is enough of a reason to save it!

    Flag
28. 578
    Name: Michael Williams on Mar 19, 2010

    Comments: This property has future potential as a heritage site.Once developed that potential would be lost forever.

    Flag
29. 579
    Name: Simon Williams on Mar 19, 2010

    Comments: This building is of national importance and should be protected from development

    Flag
30. 580
    Name: Gillian S on Mar 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 581
    Name: Tom Brydges on Mar 20, 2010

    Comments: ACD is one of Britain's most eminent authors, as well as his many other contributions to the country. I urge preserving his home. I have just been reading the recent biography, ACD: A Life in Letters, which contains many letters in which he discusses building the house. Thanks for your efforts, Tom Brydges

    Flag
32. 582
    Name: Hapwbqvjn on Mar 22, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 583
    Name: Yvcflek on Mar 22, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 584
    Name: Rclnglbtt on Mar 22, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 585
    Name: Ghwotvuhcoa on Mar 22, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 586
    Name: NIck Tile on Mar 23, 2010

    Comments: It is unthinkable to allow such a well known authors house to disappear.

    Flag
37. 587
    Name: Julia Groves on Mar 23, 2010

    Comments: This property should not be destroyed - it deserves restoration sympathetic to its history and what it can give back to the local area.

    Flag
38. 588
    Name: Joseph Cutshall-King on Mar 25, 2010

    Comments: As a passionate devotee Sherlock Holmes, I ask sincerely that you please preserve the home of Arthur Conan Doyle and keep it from becoming apartments. The world is watching and waiting to see how you treat the heritage of us all. Thank you.

    Flag
39. 589
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 590
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 30, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 591
    Name: Jane And Kenny Green on Apr 2, 2010

    Comments: SAVE IT !!!

    Flag
42. 592
    Name: Natalie Robson on Apr 9, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 593
    Name: Liz Wickham on Apr 9, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 594
    Name: David Hudson on Apr 9, 2010

    Comments: This site will be of interest to people throughout the world It has got to be saved

    Flag
45. 595
    Name: Menolly Sills on Feb 28, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 596
    Name: John Sills on Feb 28, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 597
    Name: Linda Young on Mar 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 598
    Name: Clare Crane on Mar 11, 2012

    Comments: If the destruction of this place, where some of the most popular and important works in modern English Literature were written, is allowed to go ahead then we Brits should hang our heads in shame. The fact that it is even being considered, or more to the point almost a done deal, and that we should have to fight in order to preserve it is a sad indictment of our powers that be in the councils.

    Flag
49. 599
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 30, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 600
    Name: Tracy Merrie on Apr 4, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 › »