Signatures 466 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ... 10 › »
-
201
Name: Greg on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
202
Name: Sean Beeghly on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
203
Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
204
Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
205
Name: Hannaleah Lyon on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
206
Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2008Comments: I feel that ROTC is just an extension of what is very wrong with our nation. I will not support such a corrupt organization.Flag
-
207
Name: Orianne Smith on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
208
Name: Thomas Lester on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
209
Name: Alexandra Calvin on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
210
Name: Dan O'Connor on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
211
Name: Jessica Baker on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
212
Name: Andrew Petit De Mange on May 13, 2008Comments: As a proud conscientious objector and soon to be UMBC graduate I strongly urge the administration to oppose the creation of an ROTC program at UMBC. This university strives to foster an environment of individuality, creativity, and peace, all of which are opposed by the military. I made the mistake more than seven years ago to join the Maryland Army National Guard. It took nearly 6 years for me to muster the courage to stand up for myself and declare myself a conscientious objector and request discharge from the army. Last spring was likely the most trying time of my life thus far and to see UMBC create an ROTC program just following my graduation would not only be disappointing but a disgrace. I hope the administration takes all opposition to ROTC very seriously and considers the ethical quandry not just the military dollars that will likely flow into the school.Flag
-
213
Name: Mariah Murphy on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
214
Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
215
Name: Greg Masters on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
216
Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
217
Name: Gi Devine on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
218
Name: Polly Miller on May 13, 2008Comments: Avoid the protests this will bring and preserve the college as an institution committed to teaching leadership, not followership.Flag
-
219
Name: Jacob Humm on May 13, 2008Comments: I oppose discrimination against non-heterosexuals.Flag
-
220
Name: Julie Zdanoski on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
221
Name: Matthew Johnson on May 13, 2008Comments: College not Combat!Flag
-
222
Name: Greg Mazur on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
223
Name: Jason Loviglio on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
224
Name: Natalie Sokoloff on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
225
Name: Robert Hayes on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
226
Name: Anna Moore on May 13, 2008Comments: I do not want any of my money to be a part of an organization that discriminates if I can help it.Flag
-
227
Name: Amanda Sommers on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
228
Name: Rob Bean on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
229
Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
230
Name: Danya Sasak on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
231
Name: Kaitlin Coolahan on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
232
Name: Johanna Kraft on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
233
Name: Mary Logan on May 13, 2008Comments: Just as your predecessor 40 years ago was surprised by campus reaction to a proposal to establish ROTC on campus, you are surprised. This is a campaign by corporate America to enlist the most vulnerable of our young people to fight in wars to support a system that supports the most egregious exploitation of our country's most vulnerable people, and that poisons the name of our country throughout the world.Flag
-
234
Name: Joseph Cooper on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
235
Name: Ryan Harvey on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
236
Name: Danielle Kennedy on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
237
Name: Kaitlin Taylor on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
238
Name: Judith Faucette on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
239
Name: Doug M on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
240
Name: Anonymous on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
241
Name: Arthur on May 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
242
Name: Dora Korewa on May 13, 2008Comments: For various reasons, including the problems with exclusion based on homosexuality and simply an overall distaste with the far reaching power of the military, I oppose the ROTC coming officially to UMBC.Flag
-
243
Name: Patricia Davila on May 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
244
Name: Anonymous on May 14, 2008Comments: My cousin is in the army, I wish he wasn't, but he chose to defend his country so that he could pay for college. He couldn't find money elsewhere so really he saw this as risking his life to learn. I think this whole war is wrong and that having the ROTC influence on campus is bluntly seeding the military mindset into those priviledged enough to have an opportunity to learn undisturbed by the conflict in the middle east.Flag
-
245
Name: Robin Cage on May 14, 2008Comments: ROTC and the military have no place at a liberal arts institution. They also descriminate against LBGT individuals and have a history of discrimination against women. This goes against UMBC's mission of diversity.Flag
-
246
Name: Jordanna Spencer on May 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
247
Name: Sara Ross on May 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
248
Name: Karen Kraft on May 14, 2008Comments: If all of this didn't pretty much guarantee MORE RECRUITERS on campus it might not be so bad, but we know they'll be here even worse than now lying to our kids!Flag
-
249
Name: Katrina Cohen on May 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
250
Name: Barbara Thomas on May 14, 2008Comments: Let's not militarize our education. Bring on the courses in conflict resolutions and Multi-track diplomacy instead.Flag