Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 69 total

Page: 1, 2

  1. 1
    Name: Humor Anonomous on Apr 26, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: design looks ugly
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Linda Lanz on Apr 26, 2003
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: James E. Brown on Apr 26, 2003
    State: HI
    Country:
    Comments: I find both of the designs simply very unattractive.
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Joseph Ward on Apr 26, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: I think it is a waste of money and the money is needed in so many other areas.
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Sol March on Apr 26, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: There needs to be a democratic process. Money like this should not be spent on a whim. Moreover, the ramifications of choosing either of these poorly designed logos will affect the image of the university as it will serve as a representation for the university.
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Marion Correnoz on Apr 26, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: Neither of the 2 proposed logos reflect anything hawaiian.
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Suzanne Zeng on Apr 26, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: If the logo design was very appealing, I would be in favor. But the process taken was bad. We could have saved so much money by having a competition among students for just a few thousand dollars.
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: David Ashworth on Apr 26, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: The image I project from BOTH logos is a UH campus that has several skyscraper buildings with windows sealed to the outside in order to allow the a/c to flow. I close my eyes and think of a class in Hawaiian language being taught in the atmosphere of the current UH campus. I see absolutely NO CONNECTION between the logos and the university.
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Haruko Cook on Apr 26, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: I am against the creation of a logo at this time. We do not need any new logo. Spending $82,000 to create a new logo is absolutely a waste of money.
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Kenneth Cook on Apr 26, 2003
    State:
    Country:
    Comments: UH does not need a new logo. If the university community wants a new logo, let there be a student contest to design one. $82,000 is too much to pay for a logo, especially at a time when the state needs to invest money directly in education--not in an unnecessary logo.
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: William Matsuda on Apr 27, 2003
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Makia Minerbi on Apr 27, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: I do not feel a change in the UH Logo is necessary. The $82,000 of our tax dollars should instead go towards scholarships. In any event, the contract for the design of the new logo should have been awarded to a local company, and not a mainland one.
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Kimberli Hales on Apr 27, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: More computers and improved learning environment (i.e. chairs an desks that aren't 50 years old) should come first
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Marta Gonzalez-lloret on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: The cost is incredible, and the symbol should be designed by a UH student, not some one from outside!!! We have plenty of talent in our campuses.
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Malia Eischen on Apr 28, 2003
    State:
    Country:
    Comments: The University of Hawaii should not be spending money on asthetics. Rather, it should be spending that money in a way that will improve the already not so good education at the University.
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Maile Austin on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: The 2 designs appear generic and without unique island representation. Furthermore, "island talents" should be responsible for this entity, not a Baltimore firm. There is nothing special behind these designs for they are void of island flavor.
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Susan Hirate on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: As a faculty member at UH-Manoa, I am very upset that so much money was spent on this logo project with such poor results. I do not think the two final designs are worth $82,000 nor are they suitable as a university wide logo. The committee should have made it an open competition among faculty and students across the UH system; that would have truly resulted in a design that represents the University of Hawaii. Even if a prize was awarded for BEST DESIGN, it wouldn't have costed $82,000. Here on the Manoa campus, some of us are still tolerating things like broken toilets, out of order elevators,no money for computer supplies, sharing offices in "temporary" portables that are more than 30 years old...that $82,000 could have been put to much better use. As a faculty member with close to 20 years service at UH-Manoa, I am very disappointed that, even with a new, promising administration, things have yet to change for the better.
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Kathryn Klingebiel on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: I am adamantly opposed to both the proposed logos for UH. I request that my voice be heard, in support of the existing logo, which needs no replacement.
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Chung Lee on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: I believe the whole affair about a new logo is a waste of precious taxpayers' money. It can be better spent to improve our public school system.
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: David Lally on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: I think Bachman should have organized a local design competition, open to all, with a prize equal to a small fraction of the $82K (say $5K) offered for the winnning design. This would have created a lot of local interest, and would probably have resulted in better, more local-flavored, designs.
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Katherine Orr on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: Absurdly expensive. Use local talent.
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: F. D. Miller on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: No and No and $85K is not "chicken feed".
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: JoAnn Kadooka on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: I'm really disappointed that the university didn't look in house for the new logo designs. It makes more sense to ask university students to come up with a logo that represents the school from which they are pursuing their degrees.
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Rebecca Cann on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: as a faculty member, i am totally freaked out by this misuse of state money for education, let alone the concept that an educational institution must be "branded". these arrogant administrators who are eagerly spending my indirect cost research grant monies on bread and circuses should go see what teaching classrooms in edmondson and synder hall look like, or try to live on a graduate student teaching assistant stipend of 16k/yr !
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Yingche Li on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Andrew Box on Apr 28, 2003
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Karen Kane on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: i think the high school and community college talent of local hawaii have more talent than displayed in these logos. try some locals and they are sensitive and know how hawaii is so unique,,, as opposed to mainlanders who look at us as east-west. i am faculty and i opposed to all the designes that were displayed to us all along the process
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Dennis Kane on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: i am just a local who is not proud of the image we are giving to the public of our unique chain of institutions, i don't even like the word systems.
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Kate Wolfe-Quintero on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: I do not think the logos represent the polynesian side of Hawaii, nor are they strong enough. The "H" used by the athletic department is a good example of what I mean.
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Katsuhiro Ota on Apr 28, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: William Reed on Apr 29, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: Hawaii CC's own Professor Linus Chao designed the logos for HawCC and UH-Hilo. I think they're elegant, attractive, and representative of the institutions. Why not ask Linus to design one for the system
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: David Stampe on Apr 29, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: No case has been made for the university needing new logos, and the logo project and its cost and poor results are an indictment of university leadership.
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Mark Broich on Apr 29, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: DE
    Comments: Use the art students creativity instead
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Christina Bolter on Apr 29, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: Neither represents us. How about a campus-wide vote, granted more choices are provided
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Christoph Aschwanden on Apr 29, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: The logo joices are terrible! I can come up with better than that. What about asking the art students at UH to come up with something. You could make them do it for free. Or pay something like $1000 ...
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Beatriz Haymer on Apr 29, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: Students or faculty from several disciplines across the University of Hawaii systems could have come up with a better, meaningful and presentative logo- and it would not waste $82K of taxpayer's (our) money). That's NOT free money Mr. Costello is throwing away; it came out of our pockets! If "We don't have money" to pay for faculty to provide required courses, how is it we have money to throw away. This is unethical, immoral and ilogical.
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Michael Melzer on Apr 29, 2003
    State:
    Country:
    Comments: I can understand the desire to have single logo that unifies all campuses - but the rationale of having a logo to attract students I would be suspicious of students who would base their college education on a fluffy design gimmick that will be outdated in 10 years. I would enroll in a college with an emblem of a dog crapping on a lawn if it meant I was attending a better school. For enrollment, logo means nothing, and these two mean less than that.
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Erin Sakihara on Apr 29, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Dulal Borthakur on Apr 29, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: I am disappointed to see the proposed logos. I am sad to hear that these are 82K logos.
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Patricia Donegan on Apr 29, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: I objerct to the procedure by which the logo has been created. And I think the 'wave' logo is dull and the 'spectrum' logo is terribly ill-proportioned.
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Anthony WOng on Apr 29, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: The current logo looks fine. In fact, I like it better than the two in the proposal.
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Suzanne Keeler on Apr 29, 2003
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Kit Kowalke on Apr 29, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Laura Sacia on Apr 30, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Kamil Deen on Apr 30, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: The cost of the process is not a major concern to me provided the outcome is a good one. The two final choices that they have provided are utterly unacceptable, and so I believe the committee must re-evaluate their choices. The new logo should convey a sense of history, tradition, and refinement. The two final choices look more like video game logos than a university logo.
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Madeleine Soder on Apr 30, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: When I saw these two "finalist" logos I thought it was a joke.... Why wasn't our graphic design department asked to submit proposals for the logo.... people who have extensive knowledge about Hawaii and UH and who are extremely well educated and talanted .... How could this happen.... For $82 000 there must be something better than this....
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Joanne Lichty on Apr 30, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: The logos do not invoke the spirit of Hawaii, nor the intellectual resources of the university. They look more appropriate for a hotel on Waikiki Beach.
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Marc Miyake on Apr 30, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Chung Yee Zoe Ban on Apr 30, 2003
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: I think the current logo is the best, better than the new proposed two. I don't agree with the huge expense on changing the UH logo.
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Tiare Dutcher on Apr 30, 2003
    State:
    Country:
    Comments: I think $82,000 is a lot to spend on one logo, when we need teachers more than logos. I also think the logo design should have been put out to bid in the public domain.
    Flag

Page: 1, 2

Sponsored links