Twitter Joke Trial: I do not consider @pauljchambers tweet to be "obviously menacing"

Signatures 3115 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 63 › »

1. 1
   Name: @Goonando on Nov 11, 2010

   Comments: Thanks to this judge and the CPS, I'm even more embarrassed than usual to be a lawyer

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Matt Cousins on Nov 11, 2010

   Comments: This conviction is pathetic!

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Alex Simpson on Nov 11, 2010

   Comments: this trial was a disgraceful waste of money, which the country can I'll afford.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Stephanie Gwillim on Nov 11, 2010

   Comments: This is a travesty. She should be disciplined for this blatant lack of judgment. On the day when we should be remembering those who died for free speech, Judge Jacqueline Davies let free speech die.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Jonathan Heawood on Nov 11, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Nick Harbour on Nov 11, 2010

   Comments: Paul's comments obviously were not meant to be taken seriously; they were clearly emant in a humouress tone. A shame the judge in question is humourless!

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: John Brendan Donnison on Nov 11, 2010

   Comments: Ludicrous. Unbelievable. Heavyhanded nonsense. Give me strength.

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Annabel Holroyd on Nov 11, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: M Nicholl on Nov 11, 2010

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Carl Wilbury on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Chris Hicken on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Matthew Burton on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: Today's judgment is an abuse of the law, and abuse of common sense.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: David Arnold on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Kimberley Kendall on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Christine Pearson on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: Where has our freedom of speech gone, has anyone ever heard of a sense of humour.

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Nathaniel Avery on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Nicholas Page on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: Absolutely appalled by this decision. The law has been twisted to make a very poor point. The Judge ought to resign.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Robin Pentecost on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Roisin O'Connor on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Lori Leidig on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: Any person with any sense of humor at all could clearly see this was a joke born of frustration. To have used it to set a legal precedent is outrageous... and far scarier than that innocent Tweet.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Simone Jackson on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: i think this is ridiculas concentrate on the real criminals for pity's sake

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: I am an ordinary person and as such have the ability to perceive context, seemingly unlike Judge Jacqueline Davies.

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: S Culligan on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: As an ordinary person I can honestly say a statement like that causes no alarm. What is alarming is that a Judge of the people could actually do this. It's 2010, not 1984

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Dale Cadle on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Mrs Samantha Simpson on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: I am one of the most ordinary people I know, and I certainly was not offended or felt threatened by that tweet. I totally agree with the petitioner that this ruling should be overturned, the whole trial and conviction is a farce.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Andrew Molloy on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Carl Warner on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: D Austin on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Helen Magowan on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: Anyone can see that his comment was not a real threat - if it had been a proper bomb hoax, it should have been prosecuted under bomb hoax legislation, not some obscure communications law. The joke is the British legal system. Sadly.

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Nancia Leggett on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Pat on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Karen Preston on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: Common sense needs to be returned, there are plenty of abusive and offensive things on the internet that are ignored, why pick on one person.

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Joe Moed on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Don Phillips on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: Its always irritating when people try to see things from the point of view of ' ordinary ' people. The Judge is an ordinary person, her opinion is her opinion, and stands or falls on its persuasiveness. In this case , falls

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Tony Ryan on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: A very dangerous precedent is being set.

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Leonard Challis on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: Pathetic.

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Richard Webster on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Paul Newsham on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Stephen Dray on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: Only the most despicable creatures would ruin a man's life over a poorly judged comment. Shame on you all.

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Alix Mortimer on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Nikolai Kleppe on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Stephen Whitehead on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: David Sharpe on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Rob Knight on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Caroline Oconnor on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: on this of all days what a ridiculous judgement

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Tracey Williams on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Henry Christian on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Veer Sharma on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: Are you kidding. If I had the money i'd pay he his fine. Why should he?

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Andy Crow on Nov 11, 2010

    Comments: Down with this sort of thing.

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 63 › »