Amending the Recusal Law (28 U.S.C. Sec. 455)

This petition is a response to the conduct of a federal judge who taught at a university, was a board member of one of its research centers, received $5,500 to teach a summer course at a resort location in Greece, and presided over a series of lawsuits against that same university during the same period while never disclosing her association with it. When confronted with this conflict of interest, this judge refused to withdraw despite the canons of judicial conduct that indicate disqualification, and despite the recusal statute whose general language was ignored. Throughout the country, judges associated with universities are called upon to adjudicate cases in which those universities are defendants in lawsuits.

This petition adds specific language to the recusal statute that will compel judges to withdraw from lawsuits in which their university employers are a party. It supports the incorporation of Sec. 455(b)(5)(v) into the United States Code, Title 28, Section 455(b), which adds the following phrase to the existing recusal statute: "Serves as an instructor or on an advisory board of an educational institution that is a party to the proceeding."

For a full description of this petition, see: http://www.tulanelink.com/tulanelink/petition_13a.htm

Links


Discussion

join the discussion

Recent signatures

  • username

    Richard Benavides

    2 weeks ago City: Miramar Beach
    State: Florida
    Age: 60 - 69
    Occupation: retired
    Comments: -
  • username

    John Haeger

    2 weeks ago City: Lilburn
    State: Georgia
    Age: 70 - 79
    Occupation: Retired
    Comments: See also Julie Carnes, 11th Circuit Court of Appeals
  • username

    Kacy Christopher

    1 month ago City: Keene
    State: New Hampshire
    Age: 50 - 59
    Occupation: Special Needs Advocate
    Comments: -
See more

Petition highlights

  • As signer of this petition, you join with others who believe that amendment of the Recusal Law (28 USC Sec. 455) brings us one step closer to the goal of "Equal Justice Under Law," a right promised by our Constitution but imperiled through the abuse of judicial discretion and the lack of public vigilance. See: http://www.tulanelink.com/tulanelink/petition_13a.htm