Signatures 1143 total
Page: « ‹ 1, ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, ... 23 › »
-
801
Name: Harsha Jethwa on Feb 12, 2013Comments: Today they have Taken control of two school and children from catchment area quantity has been reduced. If they taken over few more school then what about the local catchment area pupils?Flag
-
802
Name: DR JOHN HODGSON on Feb 12, 2013Comments: Education should be secular and non-political. Anything that chips away at this principle, including links, however tenuous, to the church ought to be resisted vigorously.Flag
-
803
Name: Yvonne Perrie on Feb 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
804
Name: Anonymous on Feb 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
805
Name: Anonymous on Feb 12, 2013Comments: I am seriously concerned that as a result of these proposed admissions arrangements children in Solihull will find themselves discriminated against on the basis of their parents’ religion or belief. As a consequence, I would question the legality of what is being proposedFlag
-
806
Name: Rachael Smith on Feb 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
807
Name: Anonymous on Feb 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
808
Name: Jenny Tucker on Feb 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
809
Name: Sharon Tyrrell on Feb 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
810
Name: Najia Qureshi on Feb 12, 2013Comments: I guess we have to change our faith before we can apply to Tudor Grange - It actually doesn't matter what the stats and forecasts say it's DISCRIMINATION plain and simple.Flag
-
811
Name: Alister Eden on Feb 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
812
Name: Jill Montebello on Feb 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
813
Name: Sharon Fountain on Feb 12, 2013Comments: tudor grange proposals to favour two religious schools is disgracefulFlag
-
814
Name: Deborah Bunce on Feb 12, 2013Comments: As a mother of 3 boys all at Hockley Heath school hoping to go to Tudor Grange I am concerned. If we don't get in where will pupils from Hockley Heath be sent? Also I would like all to go to same school as we are a close family and they would not like to be separated. We are one of the families furthest in the current catchment area and would stand to lose out first. There are no obvious local secondary schools for my children to walk to. Some of the proposed pupils live within walking distance of other very good seconday schools. Has the gree travel plan for the county been considered?Flag
-
815
Name: Jenna on Feb 12, 2013Comments: I think it's a disgrace and completley out of order on the children not at these other "chosen" schools!!Flag
-
816
Name: Donald Adam on Feb 12, 2013Comments: Why would a school put the needs of children educated in a faith school ahead of the needs of its local children ? This looks like religious discrimination to me. Does the school consider people of this faith superior ? This proposed policy makes me feel very uncomfortable.Flag
-
817
Name: Helena Williams on Feb 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
818
Name: Samantha English on Feb 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
819
Name: Claire Sargent on Feb 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
820
Name: Paul Sargent on Feb 13, 2013Comments: i continue to make my feelings felt on behalf of our family living in the area that i am disappointed at the approach the school is taking which lets down the immediate children who would in normal cases be entitled to attend this school. why should 2 faith schools be given priority over our children. when TGA is not a faith school. Too discriminate against our children is not good practice.Flag
-
821
Name: Anonymous on Feb 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
822
Name: John Hide on Feb 13, 2013Comments: good luck with the campaignFlag
-
823
Name:
Gordon Duffy on Feb 13, 2013
Comments:Flag -
824
Name: Cheney Morgan on Feb 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
825
Name: Sadler Johnson on Feb 13, 2013Comments: Stop discrimination.Flag
-
826
Name: Stephen Richardson on Feb 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
827
Name:
Harris A. Wain on Feb 13, 2013
Comments:Flag -
828
Name: Jim Hadfield on Feb 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
829
Name: Victoria Andrew on Feb 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
830
Name: Anonymous on Feb 13, 2013Comments: The government has learned nothing from Northern Ireland about how divisive faith schools are.Flag
-
831
Name: Matt West on Feb 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
832
Name: C.roberts on Feb 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
833
Name: HELEN WALLAND on Feb 13, 2013Comments: Tudor Grange has always been a good community school, they are letting down the local kids.Flag
-
834
Name: Anthony Mccarthy on Feb 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
835
Name: Susan Grimley on Feb 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
836
Name: Terence Grimley on Feb 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
837
Name: Brian Grimley on Feb 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
838
Name: David Atkins on Feb 13, 2013Comments: academies are for the purpose of educating all children not to raise their profiles on league tablesFlag
-
839
Name:
Amanda Fowler on Feb 14, 2013
Comments:Flag -
840
Name: Anonymous on Feb 14, 2013Comments: Appalled that such a respected school can attempt this. Talk about discrimination. Not sure I even want my children attending a school where the Management shows little effort to engage parents in such major changes.Flag
-
841
Name: John Lack on Feb 14, 2013Comments: Tudor Grange is funded by the taxpayer, as such it should have a secular approach to education. If Tudor Grange wishes to be essentially faith based, then let it join the private sector. Otherwise, the number 1 recruitment criteria should be all children in the immediate catchment area.Flag
-
842
Name: Tracy Phillips on Feb 14, 2013Comments:Flag
-
843
Name: Claire Dunkley on Feb 14, 2013Comments:Flag
-
844
Name: Elin Finnegan on Feb 14, 2013Comments: ignoring athe every childayters ethos that has been encouraged over the past decade. Tudor Grange are becoming too selective and will in turn discriminate against. children within the catchment area .iFlag
-
845
Name: Michael Fairclough on Feb 14, 2013Comments: This ia an outstanding school due to its outstanding catchment area as well as the quality of its teaching , why change?Flag
-
846
Name: Anna-Belle on Feb 14, 2013Comments: Tudor grange is a non-faith school so why give priority to ST J and ST A? Is is basic descrimination. Fair enough for ST J as they are struggling and are in need of support. But they still shouldn't have prioity over catchment kids and siblings. Wheras St A are a good school and are not in need of a high acieving academy. Many People have raised their average morgage to get a place in Tudor Grange paying more than they can actually afford. In hope of getting their child a good education, thinking in the long run it will be worth it. But what now?Flag
-
847
Name: Anonymous on Feb 14, 2013Comments: I resist the appalling manner in which Tudor Grange Academy has progressed its intentions to change its admissions policy. The process is a sham and reflects the way in which the school has been managed since it became an Academy with the adoption of a covert and autocratic approach in the way it is run. The Academy must be reminded that it EXISTS TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY and not the teachers and governors personal agenda.Flag
-
848
Name: Jackie Devereux on Feb 14, 2013Comments:Flag
-
849
Name: Shahid Mirza on Feb 15, 2013Comments:Flag
-
850
Name: Ian Bell on Feb 15, 2013Comments: it is wrong for this form of pro religious discrimination to be taking place in the 21st centuryFlag