Tudor Grange Admissions Policy

Signatures 1157 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, ... 24 › »

1. 501
   Name: Mark Walter on Feb 3, 2013

   Comments: We are strongly opposed to this new admissions policy for numerous reasons namely; - Faith over immediate local community - Faith over family values i.e. siblings - Cherry picking 2 schools over other excellent junior schools that have supported TGA for years - Adding another level of unattainable education for those who cannot afford private education or strong religious belief - Standard of education and manners of pupils drops due to influx of children outside of immediate catchment area (as proven by other schools) - We have worked hard to buy a house in a decent area with decent schools to give our children a good education. We may aswell claim benefits, rent a smaller house out of the area and become state dependent, how is this fair? - Sets a precedent for other schools to follow - Upsets the diversity and ethnic mix of the school - Change to admissions was never mentioned went the school became an Academy - TGA have not explained WHY they need to change.

   Flag
2. 502
   Name: Sophie McDowall on Feb 3, 2013

   Comments: Strongly oppose this suggestion

   Flag
3. 503
   Name: IAIN MCDOWALL on Feb 3, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 504
   Name: Farat Ara on Feb 3, 2013

   Comments: If the School really believes that it can take pupils from the 2 faith schools without impacting on children from the catchment, then why not simply give them priority 3 - according to the School's own modelling, pupils from these schools should still be able to secure a place if they so wish.

   Flag
5. 505
   Name: Jalaluddin Richards on Feb 3, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 506
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 3, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 507
   Name: David Bromage on Feb 4, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 508
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 4, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 509
   Name: Louise Shipman on Feb 4, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 510
    Name: Ying Zhou on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: I think that it is unfair to children living local to the school.

    Flag
11. 511
    Name: Carol Shipman on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 512
    Name: Stephen Evans on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 513
    Name: Kirsty McMullen on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 514
    Name: R Seery on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 515
    Name: Nicola Guest on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 516
    Name: Edmund Jolley on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 517
    Name: Victoria Denning on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: This is appalling and must be stopped.

    Flag
18. 518
    Name: Mae Nasri on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: This is certainly an unlawful act and should be stopped the rights of others are at risk

    Flag
19. 519
    Name: Suzanne Harrogate on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 520
    Name: Dee Grimes on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: This decision will impact on the catchment area for other children; house prices in the area and other schools in the area. Schools should be secular, moral and honest, seek knowledge and truth. God was created by man.

    Flag
21. 521
    Name: Robert Mellor on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 522
    Name: Francis Mallon on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 523
    Name: Catherine Woodruff on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: I am a child at Tudor Grange Academy and I am against their proposal

    Flag
24. 524
    Name: James Eames on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: Absolutely abhorrant. This is discrimination on religious grounds. It sends a clear message that the school doesn't care about catchment rules and that they think anyone who isn't a Christian is not worthy of an education. Idiots playing 'god' with children's education and life prospects.

    Flag
25. 525
    Name: Anne Hellard on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 526
    Name: Alan Pritchard on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 527
    Name: Michael Wilson on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 528
    Name: Michael Johnson on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 529
    Name: Andrew Wedgwood on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: secular services is the only fair way

    Flag
30. 530
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: This seems to be little more than a CofE takeover of education within Solihull that will be detrimental to and of no benefit for the many Solihull residents within catchment who would have expected their children to go to Tudor Grange. This is an abuse of the Acadamy process and must be investigated thoroughly.

    Flag
31. 531
    Name: Susan West on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 532
    Name: CATHERINE HOWE on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 533
    Name: Anthony Howe on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 534
    Name: Laura Glynn on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 535
    Name: Furqan Ahmad on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: should not be !!

    Flag
36. 536
    Name: Michael Hughes on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: No churches of any stripe should have any input into the education of any children anywhere.

    Flag
37. 537
    Name: Kevin Manley on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 538
    Name: Sophie Rhodes on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 539
    Name: Mike Watson on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 540
    Name: David George on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 541
    Name: Mrs Joanne Macbean on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: This is an unfair change both to those in catchment and those outside catchment with younger siblings.

    Flag
42. 542
    Name: Mohammad Nawaz on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: WE OPPOSE THIS BECAUSE THIS IS DESCRIMINATION ON RELIGIOUS GROUNDS.I have bought a house in its catchement area so that my children can get admission in Tudor grange school as my three daughters have been going to Tudor grange.

    Flag
43. 543
    Name: Paul Curran on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 544
    Name: Thomas Allen on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: This is wrong on so many levels, people plan considerable elements of there life around the school they think their children will attend this cast doubt over the considerable efforts of so many, it impacts the local ecconomy through undermining the housing market and appears to give preference to one faith group over others in a state funded school! Please reconsider this as quickly as possible to minimise the damage caused by this episode.

    Flag
45. 545
    Name: Lisa Ward on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 546
    Name: Taflyn Mcloughlin on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: disgraceful

    Flag
47. 547
    Name: Ben Hancock on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 548
    Name: Nikki May on Feb 5, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 549
    Name: R.Bates on Feb 5, 2013

    Comments: There must be some schools which are without religous bias. Religious schools already have too much public subsidy and hence influence, to the disadvatage of children from secular homes.

    Flag
50. 550
    Name: John Broggio on Feb 5, 2013

    Comments: If you want state funding you should not be able to brainwash your pupils.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, ... 24 › »