| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 1 | Ellen Munn | I reiterate everything our churches recommend instead of trident. |
| 2 | Michael Marra | |
| 3 | Michael Creechan | No cause whatsoever can justify indiscriminate killing. |
| 4 | Carol Clarke | |
| 5 | Mark Hamilton | NO MORE NUKES SOME IDIOT WILL END UP BLOWING UP THE WORLD ONE DAY |
| 6 | Tracey McLay | |
| 7 | Teresa O'Byrne | I have followed with horror the debate about Trident and am wholly of the opinion that today's world demands of us making our voices heard to ask for decommissioning and above all to ask that development in poor countries, as promised remember should be a priority for our Governments. |
| 8 | John & Anita Wilson | |
| 9 | Peter Broadhurst | |
| 10 | Jean Swinbank | |
| 11 | Philomena.Hynes | I believe that to possess nuclear weapons implies a willingness to use them-a willingness to commit massmurder. It is also a colossal waste of money. |
| 12 | Irma Bonfanti | It is obscene to spend so much on a deterent when there is so much poverty in the world. |
| 13 | Bernadette Clarey | |
| 14 | Margaret Clarke | I am very concerned about the proliferation of nuclear weapons - if a nuclear war starts there will be no winners and no earth left for anyone. I very strongly support the Cardinal's petition and also strongly support putting the money saved from not replacing Trident, into programmes of aid and development. People are dying from lack of food and medicines etc. etc. - we should be trying to save lives, not destroy lives. |
| 15 | Mr Patrick G Smyth | Why has The US of A not invaded and occupied The UK which has weapons of mass destruction within its borders and, likewise, why has The UK not invaded and occupied The US of A which has weapons of mass destruction within its borders? And are Tony Blair and George W Bush really Christians or do they just say so for the votes? |
| 16 | james magro | Our money should be put towards better things, you don't help people with nuclear wepons. |
| 17 | Patricia Cassidy | I strongly endorse every word of the petition text. |
| 18 | Philomena Muggins | |
| 19 | Fiona Gordon | |
| 20 | Doreen Grant | I feel very strongly about this issue. We should not have weapons of mass destruction |
| 21 | brian milne | How can we ask smaller countries to abandon there attempts to make weapons of mass destruction when our own Labour government supports this in this day and age all weapons of mass destruction should be destroyed |
| 22 | Margaret Hamilton | |
| 23 | Judy Hirst | |
| 24 | Professor A.P. Macmillan Coxon | |
| 25 | rita acarnley | |
| 26 | Graham Whitehead | The independent nuclear deterrent is only a deterrent against attack by a large, well-armed country. The only deterrent against terrorism is to remove the causes of people' grievances. Aid and development is thus a better deterrent than Trident. To replace Trident is to promise a crime against humanity, to aid the poor is to love humanity. |
| 27 | Norma Higgott | |
| 28 | Stuart McMillan | |
| 29 | Anonymous | |
| 30 | ruth flockhart | |
| 31 | Anonymous | |
| 32 | Lynne Niven | |
| 33 | Dick & Joyce Richardson | |
| 34 | Nancy Adams | |
| 35 | Martin and Janice Forrest | |
| 36 | Jean Swinbank | |
| 37 | Jenny Marra | |
| 38 | Jenny Marra | |
| 39 | John Conway | |
| 40 | Eileen Walsh | |
| 41 | Eileen Walsh | |
| 42 | Margaret McGowan | |
| 43 | Andrew Richardson | |
| 44 | B McDonald | |
| 45 | Teresa MC Carthy | Please, I am very much of the opinion that it it SO wrong to think of investing in Trident replacement just now, instead of using our energy to save the planet, and feed the starving millions, who are our brothers and sisters. |
| 46 | Evelyn O'Reilly | Don't, in my name replace Trident, but please in my name cotribute the money involved in feeding the hungry of the world. |
| 47 | Nancy Geddes | |
| 48 | Anonymous | I am against all forms of Nuclear bombs |
| 49 | Andrew Feeney | |
| 50 | Alex McGuire | I regard weapons of mass destruction as an absurdity, immoral, repugnant and not in my name. |
