Signatures 154 total
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
-
15
Name: Jeff Johns on Jun 19, 2007Comments: We need new ways of thinking about energy. This is 2007 after all!Flag
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
-
25
Name: Jim McConnell on Jun 20, 2007Comments: As a provider of 44 units of non-profit housing in the east end of Toronto. Riverdale Housing Action Group is very concerned that no community consultation was commenced in relation to this project. Please do so.Flag
-
26
Name: Lynn Marsh on Jun 21, 2007Comments: I am wholeheartedly in agreement with this petition, and aks that the Ontario Legislative Assembly take this very seriously.Flag
- 27
- 28
- 29
-
30
Name: Mary Ann Grainger on Jun 27, 2007Comments: Also spend the $40 billion earmarked for new nuclear on energy conservation and green power options.Flag
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
-
38
Name: Anonymous on Jul 25, 2007Comments: We don't want to expand the East Toronto Transmission Line for the sake of keep a healthy environment. Please look for other alternatives to save energy.Flag
- 39
- 40
-
41
Name: Richard Saab on Aug 3, 2007Comments: In our case the transmission lines are extremely close to the houses.Flag
-
42
Name: Johanna Manson on Aug 7, 2007Comments: I strongly disagree with this proposed ETTL. I feel that in 2007, we are so much further ahead with technology, and have a greater understanding of climate change, nuclear energy and its affects on its surroundings. There are better options and ways to improve our energy situation with that money.Flag
- 43
- 44
- 45
-
46
Name: Anonymous on Aug 9, 2007Comments: There are proven health risks associated with this....go green instead.Flag
- 47
- 48
- 49
-
50
Name: Suzanne Gibson on Aug 30, 2007Comments: Such a horrible decision on the pasrt of the government when there are alternatives that are greener, kinder and more cost effective. This province needs to get with the program and steward resources and its communities better!Flag