THE FUTURE WE DONT WANT

Signatures 2321 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 47 › »

1. 51
   Name: Nick Meynen on Jun 16, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Miroslav Polzer on Jun 16, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Miroslav POLZER on Jun 16, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Nigel Sizer on Jun 16, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Simon Howlett on Jun 16, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Harris Gleckman on Jun 16, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Lesha Witmer on Jun 16, 2012

   Comments: energy is not the only issue: water is more important and so are rights of peoples. But any investment in tiem or money that does not lead to enough, safe water is useless

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Magnus Ulaner on Jun 16, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Mathieu Soete on Jun 16, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Bernard Eng on Jun 16, 2012

    Comments: We are demanding for the future we want.

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Vincent Verzat on Jun 16, 2012

    Comments: I am shocked by this new text, the future we want is the people's future!

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Antonietta on Jun 16, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Marie-Laure Vercambre on Jun 16, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 16, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Alistair Whitby on Jun 16, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 16, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Céline Krebs on Jun 16, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Ashish Kothari, Kalpavriksh on Jun 16, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: R. Elaine Hallmark on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments: We all want a world that works for all life--human and non-human. Without that we humans will not survive! We must work together peacefully to achieve this goal.

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Katherine Teh-White on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments: support an ecological view of economic progress is warranted

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Bryan French on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Oskar T. R. Henriksen on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Brigid Driscoll on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments: So many empty words and so little positive action!

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Martin Karrer on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Yngve Kristiansen on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments: REDD+ is no solution for the future, and should be scrapped, even for its inadequate model of distribution of aid which relies too heavily on top-down structures. REDD is only promoted by self-interested parties and has as little to do with saving the forest as it has to do with climate change. Save the treaties - scrap REDD

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Rhoda Robinson on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments: Is it just me or does it seem like they are wasting time till it is too late to reach a satisfactory conclusion so that they can 'send forth' something we all hate and say "it wasn't our fault, we did not have enough time"?

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Mariana Bozesan on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Christian Lepelletier on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: René Scharer on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments: RETROCESSO DE 20 ANOS

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Marcus De Albuquerque E Mello on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments: I fully agree that the text presented is inadequate in addressing urgent issues of the global environment before us today

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Graciela Selaimen on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Stephen Barrington Leigh on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: HOLZMAN Marie on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Tara DePorte on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments: let's step it up for our planet!

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Francisco Almendra on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Marta Iris Lopez on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Hilary Miller on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Philip Virgil on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Maria T La Valle on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments: They seem to overlook the fact that it's their future too.

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Olivea Martin on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Shreejana Bhattarai on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Nigel Imonieya on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments: On behalf of PEECO (Protection of Environment and Ecosystem) we congratulate the initiators of this petition especially ANPED a humbly urge on everyone with like mind to join hands in making sure we succeed in this struggle to make sure the huge sum and time spent in organizing the Rio+20 is not in vain

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Instituto Internacional De Derecho Y Medio Ambiente (IIDMA) on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Josep Xercavins on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments: World Democratic Governance project association - WDGpa

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Christine Pintat on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Juju Wang on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments: The future non-human want is what we want.

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: José Antônio T E Silva on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Ayla Van Kessel on Jun 17, 2012

    Comments: Let us speak out for the future we really want!!

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 47 › »