Signatures 131 total
-
101
Name: Alan Pollock on Aug 17, 2008Comments: With all of the two story property across the street from the library that could be developed with commerical/condo ideas, the Mayor and his staff are just plain STUPID to go forward with this plan. The city loses and the Mayor cannot see the forest for the trees.Flag
-
102
Name: Anthony Hacsi on Aug 17, 2008Comments:Flag
-
103
Name: P. Brett on Aug 17, 2008Comments: This plan is being rammed down our throats by Mary Cheh and our out of touch Mayor. Creativity is missing from both of these dolts. A more creative plan can be found by re-inventing the opposite side of Wisconsin Avenue rather than taking this our of the children,s hides.Flag
-
104
Name: Jan Cook on Aug 17, 2008Comments:Flag
-
105
Name: Alma H. Gates on Aug 17, 2008Comments: Mayor Fenty give the project back to the community!Flag
-
106
Name: Fred M. Vinson III on Aug 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
107
Name: David Rider on Aug 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
108
Name: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
109
Name: Gregory on Aug 18, 2008Comments: From Gregory McCue 3813 Upton St, NWFlag
-
110
Name: Gregory McCue on Aug 18, 2008Comments:Flag
-
111
Name: Kathleen Day on Aug 18, 2008Comments: In addition to opposing the plan for reasons 1, 2 &3 above, I oppose it because of the secretive, misleading, undemocratic process that the Mayor's office and Mary Cheh's office employed to ram it through, without regard to the wishes and thoughts of the community. Shame on Fenty and Cheh for being in the pocket of the developers.Flag
-
112
Name: Joan Oshinsky on Aug 19, 2008Comments:Flag
-
113
Name: Christine Marwick on Aug 19, 2008Comments: The whole proposal is dreadful. Taking the Janney field is literally stealing candy from babies. And the idea that the library should be delayed any longer is appalling. I notice that the DC Government guaranteed the bonds for the improvement to infrastructures at 2 nearby private schools -- Sidwell and Gerogetown Day. Those kids, quite properly, have terrific sports facilities now. But why should DCPS kids have so much less than private school kids Do the Mayor and the Council consider DCPS kids to be the city's stepchildrenFlag
-
114
Name: Alex Novelli on Aug 20, 2008Comments:Flag
-
115
Name: Anne Schroeder on Aug 31, 2008Comments:Flag
-
116
Name: Eliza Nagle on Sep 1, 2008Comments: As a parishoner of St. Ann's Church I strongly oppose the PPP for Janney School and the Tenley Library. The impact of such a development upon the parishoners of St. Ann's and the children of St. Ann's Academy would be overwhelmingly negative.Flag
-
117
Name: Thomas Oscherwitz on Sep 3, 2008Comments:Flag
-
118
Name: Amanda Maisels on Sep 3, 2008Comments:Flag
-
119
Name: Betty Rogers on Sep 15, 2008Comments:Flag
-
120
Name: Robert Marvin on Oct 24, 2008Comments:Flag
-
121
Name: John on Nov 19, 2008Comments:Flag
-
122
Name: Anonymous on Nov 19, 2008Comments:Flag
-
123
Name: Mark E. Allen-Gifford on Nov 19, 2008Comments:Flag
-
124
Name: Parisa Norouzi on Jan 24, 2009Comments:Flag
-
125
Name: Anonymous on Jan 28, 2009Comments: Please stop the nonsense about handing over precious public land to private developers, especially when its next to one of the most over-subscribed schools in the District.Flag
-
126
Name: Jean M. Pablo on Jan 30, 2009Comments:Flag
-
127
Name: Joe Stewart on Feb 19, 2009Comments:Flag
-
128
Name: Victoria Shabo on Feb 24, 2009Comments: As a future Janney parent, I am very concerned that the school will lose green space, will have its renovation schedule pushed back, and will be deprived the benefit of a next-door library well into the next decade.Flag
-
129
Name: Yhzyvpwsb on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
130
Name: Wprihgj on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
131
Name: Qbefsmqfui on Mar 22, 2010Comments:Flag