Temple Terrace/Harvey Site

Signatures 121 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

1. 1
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 5, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Chris Clifton on Nov 5, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Edward Vance on Nov 7, 2007

   Comments: Please note that the corresponding email below was sent to Mr. Carter White Mr. White, I find it disturbing that the zoning commission would consider allowing any rezoning that would have such a harmful impact on a community. As I am sure the county is aware, Temple Terrace Highway and the surrounding neighborhood streets already have an unbearable amount of traffic causing the roads to be unsafe for neighborhood residents, most of all children. As reported by the Metropolitan Planning Organization for Transportation more than 26,000 autos occupied the accompanying road on any given day in 2005. Now that nearby Highway 301 is complete I would have to imagine that number has increased since that time. It has been said that the projected increase anticipated just by rezoning is an additional 20,000. How could this possibly be safe For the past ten plus years the county as a whole (especially the county commissioners) has disregarded proper planning of infrastructure as mandated by the state (when left in the hands of the county) which has made places such as New Tampa, South Brandon, Riverview and so on agonizing places to drive much less live. The ill conceived idea that this property should be rezoned so that developers may continue to decide the future of Florida rather than the residents is atrocious. Having to work more than full time and the parent of two school age children it is challenging to find the time to have to find research to justify what local residents already much less find the time to attend meetings that should not be necessary. I ask that you pass this along to those that are the decision makers and that they please take this to heart.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Maritza Diaz on Nov 7, 2007

   Comments: I was agreeable with the building of a Walmart, since I travel 10 miles to the nearest one to do my grocery shopping. This is ridiculous, I oppose this new development.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Joaquin Fernandez on Nov 8, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Yvonne Lombardo on Nov 8, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Docia Michaels on Nov 9, 2007

   Comments: I have lived in this area for 28 years and most of the growth has been manageable. But the type of growth planned for this property is too large for the surrounding roads and will destroy the quality of life in this area.

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Dana Lunden on Nov 9, 2007

   Comments: I don't want to see the increased traffic as well as crime that this type of development would bring. The increased traffic would put a severe strain on the structure of the existing roadways.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Christina Lunden on Nov 9, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Celeste Guice on Nov 9, 2007

    Comments: I AM COMPLETELY AGAINST THIS REZOING PROJECT IT WILL CREATE TONS OF UNNECESSARY TRAFFIC AND TRAFFIC IS ALREADY BAD

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: MARIE Guice on Nov 9, 2007

    Comments: I AM COMPLETELY AGAINST THIS REZOING PROJECT THE LAST THING THAT TEMPLE TERRACE NEEDS IS MORE TRAFFIC

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Daryl Oldham on Nov 9, 2007

    Comments: no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no you have fast food 1 mile away you have a sweetbay already there... a place to wash cloth......a dollar store for the poor people...... in this area....leave use alone.....walmart NO........WHY THIS.........................STOP IT KNOW ...................

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Edward Schroering on Nov 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Peter Bates on Nov 10, 2007

    Comments: Even though a Home Depot sounds tempting to me, I think that this development would make beautiful, peaceful Temple Terrace into another fast food city. The traffic is bad enough already, what really needs to be redeveloped is the area surrounding Busch and 56th Street, it has no character whatsoever, nothing to state 'This is Temple Terrace'.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Daryl Oldham on Nov 10, 2007

    Comments: no

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Daryl Oldham on Nov 10, 2007

    Comments: no

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Daryl Oldham on Nov 10, 2007

    Comments: no

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Catt Michaels on Nov 10, 2007

    Comments: I dont want them to build there it would be to much.We dont need all that.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Al Martini on Nov 10, 2007

    Comments: We do not need additional traffic on Temple Terrace Highway. Commercial growth should be near 56th along Busch Blvd.

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Al Martini on Nov 10, 2007

    Comments: We do not need additional traffic on Temple Terrace Highway. Commercial growth should be near 56th along Busch Blvd.

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Linda Tozier on Nov 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Peter Kaye on Nov 11, 2007

    Comments: I am opposed to this plan. There is plenty of available retail space in Temple Terrace already. The shopping center at the apex of TT Hwy and Harney is only 60% full and has been that way for over a year. There is no infrastructure to support such a development, not will it benefit the current population in that area.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Regina J. Gillett on Nov 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Rick Gomez on Nov 12, 2007

    Comments: In regard to the petition text; I could not have said it better my self. I oppose this irresponsible development 100%.

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 12, 2007

    Comments: In regard to the petition text; I could not have said it better my self. I oppose this irresponsible development 100%.

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Arlene McGonigle on Nov 12, 2007

    Comments: I agree that this area should not be developed and should probably be set aside as a protected natural area.

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Harry And Marilyn Payne, Jr. on Nov 12, 2007

    Comments: We strongly agree with the statement above and hereby express our strong opposition to the rezoning as proposed.

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 12, 2007

    Comments: I DO NOT THINK IT'S A GOOD IDEA. WE HAVE ENOUGH CONGESTIONS GOING ON IN THE AREA ALREADY.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Robert Wood on Nov 13, 2007

    Comments: My name is Robert Wood, I've lived in Temple Terrace for over 37 years. This is another bad idea for Temple Terrace. This is not the Temple Terrace the Mayor Fee and Judge Borden envisioned. A beautiful small city that wants to stay beautiful . Leave it to Tampa to destroy their land and trees. We really don't need to turn this area in to another Hillsbough av. Please do not allow this happen. Respectfully Robert Wood

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Roy Ellingboe on Nov 13, 2007

    Comments: The most used access by traffic from I-75 and Fowler will be Davis Road which is totally inadequate (especially for trucks). There are far more suitable locations available for this type of developement with interstate accessability

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Linda Raymond on Nov 13, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Linda Raymond on Nov 13, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 14, 2007

    Comments: Please keep what little bit of natural TT that is left here! There's a whole plaza sitting empty, so why does a brand new one have to built just two miles away

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Steven McBride on Nov 14, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Armstrong Onteiro on Nov 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Grant Rimbey on Nov 17, 2007

    Comments: I definitely oppose this development as currently proposed. Wal-Mart was shot down a year ago for this site and their projected daily trips was half of this development!

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Jack Lampinen on Nov 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Dale C.Boardman Sr. on Nov 19, 2007

    Comments: This property is just fine the way it is. Do not burden us with MORE traffic than this road can handle on an ordinary day.It's obvious to me and my family that NO traffic study was done in advance of the apartments that were built near Lamplighter moble home park. Enough is enough!!!

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Renee ONeil on Nov 20, 2007

    Comments: To build 'discount' centers at the proposed location would add to the deterioration of our home values. I am in favor of growth if it is done in an upscale fashion promoting new urbanism concepts- pedestrian friendly, no big boxes and utiliaztion of existing mature tress, while creating a live work play destination.

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 20, 2007

    Comments: I am mainly opposed to the apartments.

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Janet M Thomas on Nov 20, 2007

    Comments: I agree that this would be a huge mistake.

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 20, 2007

    Comments: Too much traffic on the road now.

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: John Miller on Nov 20, 2007

    Comments: What Temple Terrace needs is smart development around old Temple Terrace Plaza and not more overcrowding so developers can make a quick buck at our expense.

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments: PLEASE preserve this area. Little by little, I've seen these areas chipped away to developers who have nothing in mind but their own pocketbooks.

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 21, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3