Signatures 2734 total
- 1
- 2
-
3
Name: Francis Guilbault on Oct 20, 2009Comments: Please, has an postmaster in a federal departement of canada, I know how much this legislation is needed. We are spending alot of money, time and resources on the spam problem in the government.Flag
-
4
Name: Jim Pearcy,CGA on Oct 20, 2009Comments: As a business person I so fed up with spam. It has been very disruptive to my business. It has also been dangerous as some the spam tried to get me and my employees to give them confidential information.Flag
-
5
Name: Gerard Dunphy on Oct 20, 2009Comments: I support Bill C-27 in its original presentation as a "user must opt-in", not opt-out. The protection of citizens should prevail over a few consumer groups looking to make a commercial dollar at the expense of all Canadians who despise spam and associated malicious software such as viruses, worms, trojans, key loggers, and the like. Thank you, Gerard DunphyFlag
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
-
11
Name: Behan Webster on Oct 20, 2009Comments: I support the opt-in language for use in the C-27 anti-spam legislation.Flag
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
-
18
Name: Brian White on Oct 20, 2009Comments: As someone who gets up to 500 spam message a day (largely filtered by GMail, thank-you), anyhing that reduces the load is a good thing.Flag
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
-
26
Name: Ric Smithers on Oct 20, 2009Comments: It is my opinion that it is important to support C-27 with the current opt-in language, not the opt-out proposed by a few short-sighted business organizations.Flag
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
-
36
Name: Randal Hoffman on Oct 20, 2009Comments: Opt-out language is writing spammers a licence to annoy!Flag
-
37
Name: Gord MacKenzie on Oct 20, 2009Comments: I am equally puzzled by the want of loopholes, what for and why I get far to much spam now leave the bill alone.Flag
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
-
43
Name: Herb Daum on Oct 20, 2009Comments: I support an opt-in policy over the opt-out policy. To change the law to permit opt-out would be shameful! With the opt-out email recipients have no guarantee if they will actually be unsubscribed from the mailing list, or are merely confirming their email address is valid, thereby making it a target for even more spam email.Flag
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
-
50
Name: Jeffrey Barkin on Oct 21, 2009Comments: Governments need to set up and help curb unsolicited email campaigns.Flag