Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 385 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 8 »

  1. 101
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments: We are in support of this proposal
    Flag
  2. 102
    Name: Tom Robertshaw on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 103
    Name: Sara Draper on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 104
    Name: Robert Peterson on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments: Surely such a well managed local resource that exists in rural harmony with its neighbours should be allowed to continue to provide a service to local people!
    Flag
  5. 105
    Name: Jim Delbridge on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments: Bureaucracy gone mad! This marquee provides a brilliant facility for Guernsey and islanders should learn that we live in a limited space and we all have to learn to be more accommodating. Where else in the world would they introduce a law that inhibits a professionally run event taking place because of just a handful of objections
    Flag
  6. 106
    Name: Sarah Driscoll on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 107
    Name: Tim Bamford on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 108
    Name: Bill And Clare Cairns on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 109
    Name: Daniele Geargeoura on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 110
    Name: Jennie Dorey on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments: Have you applied retrospectively Perhaps the Royal Court would be your next step forward.
    Flag
  11. 111
    Name: Michelle on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 112
    Name: Rupert Hague-Holmes on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 113
    Name: Rupert Hague-Holmes on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 114
    Name: Rupert Iles on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 115
    Name: Pat Geargeoura on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 116
    Name: Richard Battersby on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments: This is a valuable Island facility
    Flag
  17. 117
    Name: Patience Lepp on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments: Outrageous -what a waste of taxpayers money to fund any further work involved in removing this marquee. Sueco is a fabulous local company who has provided high quality catering for so many fabulous events not to mention consistent employment over nearly thirty years. The number of people against this marquee must be counted on one hand. An absolute disgrace and I am 100 per cent behind Sueco and their staff.
    Flag
  18. 118
    Name: Joanne Motahammadani on Aug 4, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 119
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 120
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments: This marquee has been in place for years and has brought far more positive comment and very little negative ones. The views are stunning and seen by many including visitors to the Island making it a boon to the travel Industry.
    Flag
  21. 121
    Name: Emilie on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 122
    Name: Tracey Taylor on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 123
    Name: Alison Martin on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 124
    Name: Jim Martin on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 125
    Name: Kate De Menezes on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 126
    Name: Kate De Menezes on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments: This marquee provides a facility for so many Islanders and both their private and corporate events. To my knowledge the marquee does not cause any problems to local residents living near by but this refusal of a planning permission could well do with the number of events that have probably been booked already this year with Sueco.
    Flag
  27. 127
    Name: Sophie Gregson on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments: I am disappointed to read that you have been refused planning permission for the Marquee at Icart. I know that many of my friends have held their weddings at the venue, with huge success. These weddings have brought in a large number of visitors to the island and they have been hugely impressed with the location. It would be a shame if we were unable to provide this location to future brides and grooms. I would like to wish you all the success in your appeal.
    Flag
  28. 128
    Name: Fiona Loveridge on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 129
    Name: Sarah Holland on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments: We had our wedding at the marquee at Icart earlier this year and had an absolutely wonderful day. The majority of our guests were visitors from the UK, and the stunning views from the marquee have led to several booking return trips to come back and see more of Guernsey. If the marquee had been somewhere in the middle of the island, as the States are proposing, it would not have had nearly the same impact on all of our UK guests. Having a function venue in such a stunning spot can only boost Guernsey tourism, which is surely something the States should be focusing on
    Flag
  30. 130
    Name: Natalie Davidon on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 131
    Name: Alex Bridle on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments: My thoughts on this disappointing, baffling and non-sensical decision by the Environment Department are too multiple to put in a "Comments" box. I have, therefore, written to the Minister of Environment, Mr Peter Sirett.
    Flag
  32. 132
    Name: Erin Duffy on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 133
    Name: Ian Lloyd on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 134
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 135
    Name: Bev Gilman on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 136
    Name: Rob Habin on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments: This is another example of beaurocracy gone mad. Sueco is one of the few caterers within Guernsey who can provide first class food at a stunning location, which is not your typical hotel gardens, hotel function suite or within an urban area (that some of us wish to avoid at all costs). Having attended one wedding at this location I would simply call it exquisite, and denying the opportunity to use this site to any potential customers, whether corporate or personal, can only be detrimental to the local community but also any visiting guests. If the impact to the nearby residents is minimal as described, and they are not against this site to be continued to be used as it has for the past six years, then what is the problem I suspect that it is yet another case of following the law to the letter and not using any common sense, which unfortunately is happening far too frequently in this island. I suggest that the law be changed so that more forward thinking companies, like Sueco, can use their imagination and showcase the stunning scenery that Guernsey has to offer, whilst having minimal effect on the environment, the nearby community, and the scenery.
    Flag
  37. 137
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments: The marquee is a great place for holding events and weddings, and it would be appalling to not let the tradition continue.
    Flag
  38. 138
    Name: Tony Link on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 139
    Name: Anna Coombs on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 140
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 141
    Name: Cassie Sullivan on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 142
    Name: Lucy Edwards on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 143
    Name: Sara Drake on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 144
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 145
    Name: Neil Archer on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments: Give these guys a break ! They provide a service second to none locally - are committed to the island - (and I hasten to add have trained up some of the best local talent in the catering industry). We (as an island) need to wake up to modern times and realise that while agriculture and horticulture still provide an important part of the local economy, they will never use the amount of land allocated in previous planning ever again. Please be realistic and give this application some further consideration.
    Flag
  46. 146
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 147
    Name: Nicholas Martel on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 148
    Name: Shaun Winterflood on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments: Another thing to benefit islanders being taken away. Where will it end!!!
    Flag
  49. 149
    Name: R Luff on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 150
    Name: Jim Trott on Aug 5, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 8 »

Sponsored links