Support Sueco's Icart Marquee Site.

Signatures 385 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 8 › »

1. 51
   Name: Gilly Kennedy-Smith on Aug 3, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Richard Kirkpatrick on Aug 3, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Victoria Sirett on Aug 3, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 3, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 3, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Fiona Richmond on Aug 3, 2009

   Comments: The marquee seems to have little visible impact on the environment. If sound is an issue for neighbours proper sound readings should be carried out by the environmental health department to monitor the impact as it seems far enough away from any houses not to be a problem.

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 3, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Alison Hawkins on Aug 3, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Mrs Emma Howard on Aug 3, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Martine Bougourd on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments: It would be a real shame if this venue was refused - it is in an ideal, unique location and the impact on the environment is far out weighed by the positives this venue type brings to Guernsey.

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Stuart Anderson on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments: The knock on effect of not being able to use this site is quite large,from catering staff reduction,many of whom are part time,so a loss to the general tax revenue,to those that are part of the supply chain,from food and drink,including milk from the dairy,to the disposal of waste,including recycling.It may not seem much,but over 5/6 months it all adds up.And finally,has anyone from planning even bothered to visit the site!!

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments: The knock on effect of not being able to use this site is quite large,from catering staff reduction,many of whom are part time,so a loss to the general tax revenue,to those that are part of the supply chain,from food and drink,including milk from the dairy,to the disposal of waste,including recycling.It may not seem much,but over 5/6 months it all adds up.And finally,has anyone from planning even bothered to visit the site!!

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Jez Robin on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Marc Maubec on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Cordelia Robinson on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments: We were visitors from the UK, and we distinctly remember what an fantastic venue it was. Guernsey is a beautiful place, and this venue really bought out the best of it... incredible! For a temporary structure, this venue was outstanding.

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Karen Melhuish on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments: Good luck, you have my support Merilee.

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Andrew Richmond on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Sarah & David Bradley on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Luke D on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Sarah And Richard Crawford on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Eileen Collins on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: James Le Page on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Jo Bourgaize on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments: Sueco are providing an excellent venue and service to the people of Guernsey. They need supporting and not hindering.

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Sarah Bishop on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments: Changes in legislation are usually done to fix a problem in society and prevent them getting out of hand in the future. What are usually over looked are the micro effects these changes have on specific business and communities. They often have a negative effect where there were no real problems before. I believe this is such a case. I have been visiting Guernsey for the last 20 years and to think that Sueco have been refused planning permission to erect one of their marquees during the summer months, which they have been using for the last 6 years (no problem existed before), because there has been a change in legislation is frankly very silly. I have been to a number of functions in the marquee and find that it is in such a picturesque setting that you couldn’t ask for a better place in Guernsey to hold a function. The marquee is of the highest standard, it is a way to help attract visitors and locals to the area so they can enjoy the setting. I have spoken to Sueco about a booking in the next year and they have explained to me that the extra cost the new legislation will put on the business means that the cost of holding a function will now have to increase dramatically, and thus now will be out of our reach (and I suspect also many of their other clients as well). I will therefore have to look for a different venue. It’s very disappointing that this company is forced to change their business practices for no real reason (especially in this economic climate) the knock on effect this could have on their business and also their clients because of a change in legislation. Sueco have been doing this for 6 years without problems or complaints, to take this marquee away from them in this manner beggars belief. Why do you have to do this to a caring, creative family run business

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Melanie Sirett on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Wenda Matthews on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments: My daughter has organised for her wedding reception to be at the Icart site next year in August and we would be deeply disappointed if the planning permission was not granted. We have many family and friends coming from the UK and abroad to the wedding and would like to show Guernsey at its best which the Icart site does superably with its breathtaking, stunning views.

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments: I wish you luck, hope you win.

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Tim Osman on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Christopher Harvey on Aug 3, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Matt Watson on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: Jo Delbridge on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Kevin Smith on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Emily Stock on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Marcus Allen on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Peter Levy BSc Env Geol on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Sheila Le Lievre on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments: Dear Sue and Peter We are so appalled to hear about your blight and whole heartedly support your business at Icart, which has given so many people so much pleasure. I recently attended a WRVS tea event at your marquee, which I thoroughly enjoyed due in the main part for your expertise with all the arrangements, which were very professionally carried out for the afternoon. Our support is very strong that you should be allowed to continue operating at the Icart site. Sheila and David Le Lievre

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: TONY WEAVER on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments: We live in the vicinity and have suffered no nuisance, also it is clearly unacceptable to interrupt a commercial operation in the middle of a season when no action has been taken for something of the order of five years

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Christine Weaver on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Paul Wilkes on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Simon Brown on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: John Cable on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Owain Roberts on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Rachelle Wilkes on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Ian And Sue Lloyd on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: DAVID SHEIL on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments: It is deeply distrubing and sinister that anyone would possibly want to object to the temporary erection of the marquee.

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Joan Howard on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments: This is an acceptable use of a stunningly beautiful area of Guernsey and would make it accessible for many more people to enjoy

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Joan Howard on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments: This is an acceptable use of a stunningly beautiful area of Guernsey and would make it accessible for many more people to enjoy

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: Penny Weaver on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Penny Weaver on Aug 4, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 8 › »