Stop the Oread Inn!

Signatures 299 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 6 › »

1. 1
   Name: Samuel J Schlageck on Jan 27, 2008

   Comments: As a student at the University of Kansas, I have heard many students voice their concern about this development. It's time that the city listened to us and stopped this thing from being built

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Katherine Wiley on Jan 27, 2008

   Comments: The Oread Inn should be the last thing the City of Lawrence should spend $10 Million dollars on.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Ali Edwards on Jan 27, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Joy Lawson on Jan 27, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 27, 2008

   Comments: Not only should the Oread in not be built but think of the history and traditions that are being torn down and sacraficed in order to do so.

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Abigail Boudewyns on Jan 27, 2008

   Comments: The proposed development is out of context with the existing structure of the neighborhood. It would change both the look and feel of the area and thus have an adverse affect on the surrounding community.

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Jamie Wenke on Jan 27, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Ashley Siebert on Jan 27, 2008

   Comments: Lawrence is one of the few cities I've ever been in that has managed to retain a downtown area that is both historic and successful economically. The neighborhoods surrounding the downtown and campus areas reflect this and this establishment would be a direct threat to the atmosphere which many have struggled to keep.

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 27, 2008

   Comments: Building the Oread Inn would destroy buildings that have are a KU tradition. It would also being something that would not directly benefit the students of University of Kansas

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Hilary Kelman on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: The hotel would completely change the dynamic of student life in the area. It is wiping out establishments frequented by students. Why does Lawrence need a hotel in this location And why does the city of Lawrence need to help foot the bill

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Sarah Van Gorp on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Amanda Boyer on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: This monster would be a defamation to the community surrounding it and also to the University of Kansas. This hotel is unwanted and unnecessary.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Molly Daughety on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Alison McAfee on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Nathan Mack on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Cooper Martin on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: This is ridiculous. I don't object to development, but there is such a thing development that enhances the character and culture of the neighborhood. This would be the converse to that approach.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: John Giles on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Marleta Sullivan on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Daniboyd on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Dennis Mersmann on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Brandon Harvey on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: We don't need private industries messing up the KU skyline.

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Sean Hall on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: although it may breing business and jobs to students, it will cause more problems than solutions, especially for the tax money needed elsewhere. And Quite frankley, there is simply no room.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: James Hopkins on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Niki Fanara on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Joshua Summers on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Sarah Garner on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: Damn the man, save The Crossing and Yello Sub!

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Brett Beneke on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Kim Le on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: I do not think that the current Oread Development plan, as proposed, will contribute meaningful benefits to the city of Lawrence. I have my doubts about the ability of the new hotel to attract enough revenue to counteract the many damages that its presence would inflict upon the surrounding community. I am not opposed to commercial development in this area, but I believe that it should be done in an intelligent manner, with long-term goals of future Lawrence development in mind.

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Jon Corkins on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Kelli Androes on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Kevin Morgan on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: What's currently there has much more character and defines Lawrence much better than a high class luxury hotel.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Alycia on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Meghan Skornia on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Erin on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Ren on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: First, this is a horrible location to place a hotel; that part of the hill is perilous enough for drivers as it is, adding more traffic would not only not inconvenience the people that live in that area, but also disrupt University students and KU on Wheels. Second, this hotel would be in competition with The Eldridge, which not only has significant historical value, but is a unique fixture in the city of Lawrence. Finally, if taxpayers must fork over $10 million dollars for road repairs, it should be used on roads that have heavier traffic and are in more dire need of repair; for instance, 19th Street between Mass. and Naismith. Let's put neighbors before developers, shall we

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Melinda Robinson on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: This new Hotel will only bring more problems to, not only KU students but the residents of the surrounding area. Build it somewhere else!

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: Part of the great part about being a student at the University of Kansas is the great culture and history that fills the city. A large development like this would tear apart the culture that students come from around the country to experience.

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Mitch Schuetz on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: I just don't see the sensibility in piling a high end hotel right on top of the KU campus, especially one of the areas with such a reputation for being based on recreation.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Erin Lewis on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Jeff Dressel on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: I feel that this location for the hotel is an offense to the character of the University. The most prominent building in the KU skyline should be an academic building, not an ill-advised, privately owned, hotel.

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Danielle Englert on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Allison Richardson on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Andy Hess on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: this is an affront to the University of Kansas.

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Kyle Purdon on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: As a 4th generation student I have discussed the proposal with my parents and grandparents, and nobody likes the idea. I do agree that road renovations need to be made but the Oread Inn is not the answer for the corner. I'm not sure what that answer is but I would love to see an alternative.

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Mandy Toomey on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Caitlin Curry on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments: i live in this neighborhood. i do not think oread inn would benefit the residents. if anything it would be harmful with increased traffic and people

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Jamie Nixon on Jan 27, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 6 › »