Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 922 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 19 »

  1. 1
    Name: Matthew Ballard on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments: The "new" technology park will be a dynamic environment for commercializing research. Large companies will be welcomed and entrepreneurs and start-up companies will be nurtured. New products and new companies will be created to stimulate economic growth and solve today's critical challenges, many with national and global significance. We can do it!
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Adam Lucas on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments: Please help to save this research center.
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Jack Smith on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Barbara Bayes on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Robin Holstein on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Myra Dolan on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments: Please support this effort!
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Joseph H. Deacon III on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: J. Joseph Fuller on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Jose F. Cevallos-Candau on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments: This is an issue important to all of West Virginia. I wish that Mr. Jones in Charleston and Mr. Mullen in South Charleston come to the realization of the importance of this issue and set aside their petty political arguments and stop putting road blocks
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Debbie Varney on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments: Opportunities may come only once in a lifetime. Why waste resources that are already there by letting this opportunity slip away? This is the perfect time because nothing will get any cheaper! Time to lead the pack and keep this resource open to researching how to make coal clean and EVERYONE wins!
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Jay Long on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Keith Pauley on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments: Please help us create jobs in West Virginia.
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Carolyn Busker on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments: Save the tech park! We need jobs for South Charleston.
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: JoEllen Zacks on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Elizabeth Copley on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments: These assets are irreplacable in our lifetime. To let them be demolished would be a criminal act toward the state of the economy in West Virginia.
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Dr. Venkat N Gudivada on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Lisa Jackson-Mosrie on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments: MATRIC has become an incredible business in the state of WV bringing international attention to our state. Where else would we find a place for laboratories such as ours then where we are now? It's essential we continue to support business and job growth in the state of WV. Save the Tech Park!
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Elizabeth Gershon on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Vic Sprouse on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments: Please take action to save the Tech Park and accept the Dow donation.
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Tom Heywood on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments: I believe that the future of the Technology Park will define the future of the Kanawha Valley. If we do things right, the best days of the Tech Center are ahead of us. If we squander this opportunity, the Tech Center will become just another office park over the next 15 years or so. During the second half of the 20th Century, the Tech Center attacted world class talent, and created incrediible opportunity and prosperity across our region. The potential to do the same in the first half of the 21st Century is at least as great. We must seize and not squander this unique opportunity.
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Nolan Nicholas, PhD on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: AGS TARON Technologies Inc. on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Henry Gysling on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments: Our company has had work done at this facility - it is a valuable technical resource for many industries, as well as ours (emisison control technology) HG
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Matthew Peterson on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: D James Schreck on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments: The technology park has the potential to help West Virginia create new jobs in the state by creating new businesses as well as through job growth at the technology park. Please give it your support.
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Erica Trump on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Randall Boyd on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments: If Fairmont can have a Tech Park, so can South Charleston. If you don't vote yes, you are against creating jobs.
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: James P Campbell on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Lee Fisher on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Claude A. Rolston on Feb 8, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Duane Dombek on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments: The faciities at the tech park are unique in this area. Many jobs will be lost if these facilities become unavailable, and the opportunity to create many times that number of jobs will be destroyed.
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Thomas Mooney on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Michael P. Castellani on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments: This facility is a tremendous resource that should be preserved if at all possible. As the state's institutions of higher education graduate increasing numbers of scientists, facilities such as the Dow site offer opportunities for our graduates to stay in West Virginia. Michael Castellani Chair, Department of Chemistry Marshall University
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: George Bernath on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments: I worked for Union Carbide at the Technical Center for thirteen years. The scientists and technicians there made many important discoveries that continue to improve our daily lives. It would be great to see Matric and similar research organizations take root at the Tech Center and make discoveries that can only be imagined. Without a Tech Center these discoveries will be out of reach.
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: J. Kevin Elkins on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments: It is extremely inportant that the South Charleston Technical Center remain 'open for business', as it has for over 40 years. The currently employment at the site simply can not be ignored - it is SO important to the individuals & their contribution to the economy of the Kanawha Valley. Of course it is a 'hassle' to the the State to find the time & resources to complete the deal with Dow, but a 'hassle' that MUST be overcome to maintain ( and utimately increase) the valuble scientific employment it represents. Do the right thind, regardless of short term thinking, and keep the Tech Center strong!!!
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: John Sawyer on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments: This is a rare opportunity to have a positive economic effect West Virginia for many years. There has been much talk about 'doing something' to improve the state economy, and this is a positive step to Act rather than defer.
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Betty S. Ireland on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments: The State of West Virginia absolutely cannot let this opportunity go by. The So. Chas. Tech Park has got to become a reality.
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Lawrence Malone on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Jennifer Kmiec on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Erica Sladky on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Michele Grinberg on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments: We need quality work in WV which will attract and keep young, bright people. The Tech Park occupants have made a great start in building a research center in the greater Charleston area. Let's not throw this opportunity away. Fairmont visionaries are getting it done with their research park; they've proved it can be done. Please help with this important project.
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Paul Helmick, CEO, StateNewslines on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Greg Gargus on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments: These fine facilities may provide the basis for incubation of other science and engineering companies as well as the existing tenants.
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Don Frazer on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments: I am not a citizen of West Virginia, but I am a businessman who does business with Matric Research. They play a very important role, and I would like to see the state take advantage of this opportunity to keep the research park as an asset.
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Ronald L. Belcastro, P.E. on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments: My name is Ron Belcastro. I am a registered professional engineer who is fortunate to work with MATRIC. I would not have had the opportunity to return to West Virginia and work with this great organization without the presence of professionals who understand the importance of keeping and retaining both the talent and facilities contained in the south Charleston Technology Park. I witness the groundbreaking research being perfomed at MATRIC, and am sure the State of West Virginia will reap an immense return to both the State and Nation by investing in this jewel of the Kanawha Valley and State of West Virginia. Please make the right decision - keep the South Charleston Technology Park. Thank You...Ron Belcastro, P.E.
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: William Bivins on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments: Matric provides our R&D, Engineering Development support. We partner with Matric in the development of our clean coal module....to which both states of WV and KY will benefit. SAVE OUR TECHNOLOGY PARK!
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Manuk Colakyan on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Bruce A. Finlayson on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments: Member, National Academy of Engineering 2000 President, American Institute of Chemical Engineers Vice-chair, Chemical Engineering Section, National Academy of Engineering
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Chris Niewierowski on Feb 9, 2010
    Comments: Please save and utilize this valuebale resources to create jobs and tax revenue.
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 19 »

Sponsored links