Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 72 total

Page: 1, 2

  1. 1
    Name: Kerryn McKay on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: David Horwitz on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Rebecca Kahn on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Nico Elema on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Kevin Goldstein on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Rebecca Kahn on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Daniela Faris on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Malcolm McLean on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Sarah Blake on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Anonymous on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Heidi Schneigansz on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: EMil Wentzel on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Anonymous on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Anonymous on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Sarah Manners on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Mark Kourie on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Tim Withers on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Terez Taylor on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Stephen Song on May 26, 2009
    Comments: Open innovation can be as big an economic and investment driver as any attempt to restrict (in the name of protection) access to South African intellectual property. South Africa needs policies that reflect a spectrum of IP strategies to boost innovation.
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Anonymous on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: David Robert Lewis on May 26, 2009
    Comments: Its not sufficient for the South African executive to refrain from banning all academic freedom, its constitutionally obliged to positively promote that freedom: Section 7 of the SA Bill of Rights provides; (2) The state must respect, protect, promote and fulfil the rights in the Bill of Rights. Thus the Department and Minsiter of Science and Technology is obliged to promote academic freedom, which this subordinate regulation does not do.
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Rafiq Phillips on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Denise Nicholson on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Ramika Pillay on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Rosanne Van Der Merwe on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Sonja on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Stephen Marquard on May 26, 2009
    Comments: It is essential that South Africans are able to contribute to global open source projects in an environment of legal certainty.
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Derek Keats on May 26, 2009
    Comments: I have already submitted a lengthy objection.
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Verashni Pillay on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Laura Czerniewicz on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Laura Czerniewicz on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Anonymous on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Philipp Schmidt on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: George Wells on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Gert Van Den Berg on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Arthur Attwell on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Jason Van Niekerk on May 26, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Nicholas Ray on May 27, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Sue Cilliers on May 27, 2009
    Comments: I can simply not agree to openness in research and development in South Africa being limited
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Anonymous on May 27, 2009
    Comments: the only major issue to me is: • The Regulations provide for intrusive and invasive march-in rights, through which the Department can retroactively reverse decisions made by the universities, threatening that uncertainty will be the dominant mood of South African research. This is unacceptable
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Uma Suthersanen on May 27, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Johanna Von Braun on May 27, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Heather Ford on May 27, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Sarah Rice on May 27, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Corli De Kock on May 27, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Anonymous on May 27, 2009
    Comments: Although I feel that this is a well intentioned Act, its implementation is poorly thought out and unworkable. Back to the drawing board.
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Louis Fourie on May 27, 2009
    Comments: The draft regulations is a serious threat to academic research and need to be totally reworked after more consultation with all stakeholders.
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Neil Butcher on May 27, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Michael Graaf on May 27, 2009
    Comments: Further consultation please.
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Anita Kromberg on May 27, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: 1, 2

Sponsored links