Signatures 105 total
-
1
Name: Christine Irving on Jun 21, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): Why does the city need to rushinto a 20 year lease without proper public consultation and a western waterfront master plan. Defer.Flag
-
2
Name: Max Stevens-Guille on Jun 21, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): The Palais Royale is a private venture. They only pays $25,000 a year for the lease of the Palais Royale. Do the math: $500k represents the entire amount amount the city stands to gain. The City wants to enter a lease with this private concern. What happens if they go bankrupt or sell Does the lease for the parking lot go with them to whoever picks it up This city council seems to be making some very short sighted decisions. Let's help them find a vision that everyone can sign up for.Flag
-
3
Name: Max Stevens-Guille on Jun 21, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): The Palais Royale is a private venture. They only pays $25,000 a year for the lease of the Palais Royale. Do the math: $500k represents the entire amount amount the city stands to gain. The City wants to enter a lease with this private concern. What happens if they go bankrupt or sell Does the lease for the parking lot go with them to whoever picks it up This city council seems to be making some very short sighted decisions. Let's help them find a vision that everyone can sign up for.Flag
-
4
Name: Peter And Diana Stevens-Guille on Jun 21, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): The waterfront belongs to all of us, visitors and citizens of Toronto alike. A parking lot should be invisible, preferably underground. Parks are for people, not cars.Flag
-
5
Name: Claudette D'Souza on Jun 21, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
6
Name: A Hrabinski on Jun 21, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
7
Name: Lesley Durham on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
8
Name: Ted Cordina on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): Around the world the trend is to turn away from accomodating the mighty car and allocate land, money and resources towards Public Transit. Our Mayor is lost in the woods.Flag
-
9
Name: Anonymous on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
10
Name: Catherine Kennedy on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
11
Name: Tony Nguyen on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
12
Name: Anonymous on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): Though I don't live in the area concerned, I am a citizen of Toronto and that parkland is "my" parkland too! I want the city to look at ALL POSSIBLE options before signing a 20 year lease with Pegasus Group. It is the right thing to do for the citizens of Toronto.Flag
-
13
Name: Anonymous on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
14
Name: Simon Laperle on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): Come on Mayor Miller, show us your green side. I know you don't want to encourage the use of cars and more parking lots to keep turning this city into smog-central.Flag
-
15
Name: Richard Mason on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): It boggles my mind that the city is considering putting in more parking along the waterfront while at the same time preaching about waterfront revitalization.Flag
-
16
Name: Donna Workman on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
17
Name: Barry Goldman on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
18
Name: Lari Langley Taylor on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
19
Name: Miriam Yosowich on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): I am so very disappointed in the municipal government for this terrible idea.Flag
-
20
Name: Owen Clarke on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
21
Name: Sarah Mackie on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
22
Name: Jeremy Roedde on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
23
Name: Anonymous on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
24
Name: Candida Higgins on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
25
Name: Kiera Brown on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
26
Name: Andrew Milne on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
27
Name: Anonymous on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
28
Name: Juan Gomez on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
29
Name: Michelle Hunwicks on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
30
Name: Anonymous on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
31
Name: Kirk Brown on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
32
Name: Robert Camp on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): Why pave greenspace without a full examination of optionsFlag
-
33
Name: David Shimoda on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
34
Name: Anonymous on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
35
Name: Kevin Wan Min Kee on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): I love the palais royale, but no more parking lots, please! Keep the lakeshore beautiful and car free!Flag
-
36
Name: Colleen Bishop on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): Having moved here from Victoria, BC, I am disturbed by what has already been done to Toronto's beautiful waterfront(the highway cutting off the city from the water). Please don't let them pave and destroy our park anymore....Flag
-
37
Name: Anonymous on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
38
Name: Aron Wallaker on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
39
Name: Colin Brown on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
40
Name: Leanne Herbst on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
41
Name: Kieran McConnell on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
42
Name: John Mcarton on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): this is infuriatingFlag
-
43
Name: Anonymous on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
44
Name: Anonymous on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
45
Name: Monica Kerr-Coster on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): 20 years is a long commitment without proper investigation!Flag
-
46
Name: Anonymous on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
47
Name: Jenie Perna on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
48
Name: Pamela Yiu on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag
-
49
Name: Nigel Wallis on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): The creeping privatization of public space is a shame - lets hope it stops here.Flag
-
50
Name: Julie Kramer on Jun 22, 2006Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):Flag