Signatures 24 total
Page: 1
-
1
Name: Carol Paulic on Dec 6, 2007Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Anonymous on Dec 7, 2007Comments: Although it does make a point, I find this commercial extremely disturbing and think a message could be conveyed in another way.Flag
-
3
Name: Pat Cissell on Dec 7, 2007Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Tony Paulic on Dec 7, 2007Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Pam Josson on Dec 7, 2007Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Steve Staresina on Dec 7, 2007Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Claudette Chabot on Dec 7, 2007Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Anonymous on Dec 7, 2007Comments: These commercials are not necessary with such graphic displays. Kids and consumers alike can get the message without the graphic nature your commercials are displaying.Flag
-
9
Name: Anonymous on Dec 7, 2007Comments: I whole-heartedly agree.Flag
-
10
Name: Anonymous on Dec 7, 2007Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Anonymous on Dec 8, 2007Comments: While graphic images are used to "imprint" in the viewer's mind the severity of , in this case, burns, it is prudent to take into consideration the time slot chosen to air such disturbing images. Additionally,there should be a warning given so that if children are watching t.v. at least parents have that moment to use their discretion and make the decision appropriate to their child's age and maturity. Thank you.Flag
-
12
Name: Lena Bolcic on Dec 8, 2007Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Linda Hines on Dec 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Anonymous on Dec 13, 2007Comments: the other ads where the "dead" victims talk afterward are not as bad - like the one with the man who is impailed by a bunch of steel rods. but this is a bit extreme and i change the channel every time it comes on tv.Flag
-
15
Name: Marilyn Lawlor on Dec 14, 2007Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Anonymous on Dec 16, 2007Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2007Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: June Martin on Dec 20, 2007Comments: not appropriate regardless of the messageFlag
-
19
Name: Anonymous on Jan 21, 2008Comments: Although I recognize the importance of the message, there should be a graphic content advisory provided at the beginning on the Chef scenario PSA for WSIB. I feel this is entirely too graphic and disturbing for regular television.Flag
-
20
Name: Anonymous on Jan 25, 2008Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Leah Puckering on Feb 4, 2008Comments: I saw this commercial for the first time on Saturday night at 8:05 while watching Hockey Night in Canada on the CBC. I know that many young people also watch Hockey Night in Canada, like for instance my 4 year old nephew and 10 year old neice... I was DISGUSTED by this ad, I do not watch slasher flicks and was extremely upset to have one forced upon me with no warning. I am not surprised to see that my tax dollars have been wasted by a government agency that is too stupid to realize their target audience. Every single chef/line cook/restaurant employee that I know would have been at work at 8:00 on a Saturday night, not at home watching TV...Flag
-
22
Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2008Comments: Joint responsiblity, not ads engineered to the blame working people.Flag
-
23
Name: Beth Mcquinn Nixon on Feb 6, 2008Comments: How about WSIB doing a commercial on the trauma that befalls the families of Injured Workers when WSIB and other WCB's don't pay those injured through workplace accident and disease Kids going hungry, families using their house, car, trips to food banks - all at the hands of WSIB and WCB's. Safety is important - but WCB's have two focuses... safety and compensation. If they can't meet their obligations on compensation - why do we think they can handle promoting safetyFlag
-
24
Name: Anonymous on Aug 9, 2008Comments: I agree! I understand the need to inform the public about workplace safety, but these ads go too are.Flag
Page: 1