Stop burning the Lower Buffalo Wilderness

Signatures 145 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

1. 51
   Name: Barbara Halbert on Feb 8, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Jeff Wasson on Feb 8, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Brian Wasson on Feb 8, 2013

   Comments: Please stop the burning.

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Brad Wasson on Feb 8, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Sharon Lawson on Feb 8, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Leah Brawley on Feb 8, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Mallarie Zimmer on Feb 9, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Chris Burnley on Feb 9, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: David Hicks on Feb 9, 2013

   Comments: Wliderness: define for me is a "small patch" of our lands that we leave alone not to be influenced by man. Visit it and leave it be. Management of any kind in these spaces goes directly against what wilderness means. ??? I just do'nt get it manage forest and parks Not Wilderness.

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Adam Leonards on Feb 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Meredith on Feb 10, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Kathryn Rogers on Feb 11, 2013

    Comments: Please keep our nation beautiful!

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Dave Spencer And Nan Johnson on Feb 11, 2013

    Comments: Least "management" is best, particularly in and near wilderness areas. Also, as an asthma sufferer I'm endangered by large scale burning that puts huge amounts of particulate matter in the air.

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Toni Adisano on Feb 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Henry Himstedt on Feb 12, 2013

    Comments: Without an Environmental Impact Statement and signed Record of Decision to properly document this action, the National Parks Service is doing an injustice to the Lower Buffalo Wilderness and to the taxpayers. The NPS certainly requires an EIS for any action that would use the water flowing from a remote tributary into the Buffalo River, but they do not require an EIS of themselves for something as environmentally significant as a man-generated burn. It seems as though the NPS is acting without regard to environmental precedent and due consideration. Maybe the NPS should consider the Lower Buffalo a true wilderness and leave it alone.

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Barbara Erdman on Feb 12, 2013

    Comments: Petition Stop burning the the lower Buffalo Wilderness

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Elizabeth S on Feb 12, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Talya Honor on Feb 13, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Gabriela Voicila on Feb 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Joshua Pieper on Feb 16, 2013

    Comments: This a a terribly misguided project.

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Raffaella Scola on Feb 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Tom McClure on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments: I am opposed to the proposed prescribed burn (scheduled for March, 2013) in the Lower Buffalo Wilderness. I, along with many others, are asking the National Park Service that manages the Lower Buffalo Wilderness (Buffalo National River) to cancel this burn immediately. Fire management of this kind in wilderness areas runs counter to the purpose of wilderness. Wilderness is a place where we observe to see what happens without man's interference. On the other hand, all lightning-caused fires should be allowed to burn in wilderness areas, except in the rare case, where a house is threatened that adjoins the Wilderness. I consider the combined Lower Buffalo/Leatherwood Wilderness, comprising about 60 square miles, as one of the finest wilderness areas in the United States and certainly the largest contiguous wilderness in the entire Ozark Region. It is a premier wilderness resource for Arkansas and Missouri, and the central part of the country. I know this burn is scheduled to happen soon, and that this request is being made at a late date, but that doesn't make the request to stop the burn any less valid. And there are certainly many examples of resource decisions being stopped at the last minute. The decision-making process that led to the Buffalo River itself remaining as a free-flowing stream is one example. I hope Superintendent Cheri, Senator Pryor, and Senator Boozman will put their heads together and decide to call off this burn, and that the Park Service will reassess their management plan for the Lower Buffalo Wilderness. Thank you, Tom McClure

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Kirk Wasson on Feb 19, 2013

    Comments: I approve and appreciate 98% of what the National Park Service does to protect the Buffalo National River BUT the burning of wilderness needs to stop. I may understand why they need to burn other areas of the park but not the wilderness. All the elements of a logical decision are not there. Plus the underlining need to just leave wilderness alone. The Forest Service across the river does not have a problem with and Leatherwood Wilderness is better off for it. Maybe not IDEAL according to college and stump researchers but on its own terms a great place. I have been there lately so I know first hand. Wilderness in Arkansas does not need fire. Maybe out west but not here. All the reasons presented are vague at best and criminal at worst. What is being done to the turtles, turkey, raccoon, and other small critters has not been address in the cycle of burning in the Lower Buffalo Wilderness. Go manage other places and leave the wilderness alone.

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Anneke Andries on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Autumn Sweeley on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Sun Cho on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Arianna Son on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: DAVID GRUENEWALD on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments: I support this petition.

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: Evans Benton on Feb 27, 2013

    Comments: Stop the wasteful burning.

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Chantal Buslot on Feb 27, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Nicole Weber on Feb 27, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Elisabeth Bechmann on Feb 27, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Jasmina Cuk on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Nafsika Tentokali on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Theodore Spachidakis on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Mary Mand on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Karin Lindberg on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Yolanda Schultes on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments: Stop the burning of the Lower Buffalo Wilderness

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Daria Wilanowicz on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Christine on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Manuela Wolter on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Alexandr Yantselovskiy on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Christopher Evans on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Katia Travassos on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Franziska Eber on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Raffaella Scola on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: MARCO PARRAVICINI on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Mark Nabb on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments: Fire only helps pine trees grow. The native americans burnt to create plains. If you want the forest to be grassland instead, keep doing what you're doing. DUMB.

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3