Signatures 192 total
-
1
Name: Nicholas Butcher on Jul 13, 2008Comments: Please make sure news of this gets around so people can decide for themselves how they want the future New Zealand to be.Flag
-
2
Name: Robert Turner on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Robert Holt on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Lisa McLean on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Geoffrey Butcher on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Davy McLean on Jul 13, 2008Comments: You have my support, to not support the Immigration Bill.Flag
-
7
Name: Clinton Smith on Jul 13, 2008Comments: We don't need to abandon our fair and just immigration system to protect us from the terrorist bogeyman.Flag
-
8
Name: Anonymous on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Idiot/Savant on Jul 13, 2008Comments: The billis a human rights disaster which should not be passed in its present form.Flag
-
10
Name: Mike Porton on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Alasdair Muckart on Jul 13, 2008Comments: The violations of human rights entrenched in this bill are not something any western democracy should vote into law. I will not vote for any MP or party, ever, who supports this bill through parliament. It is an embarrasment to the country I now call my home after immigrating here 18 years ago.Flag
-
12
Name: Sam Vilain on Jul 13, 2008Comments: No doubt this is the result of being cajoled by overseas "anti-terrorism" acts. See through them, don't sacrifice NZ's fine reputation.Flag
-
13
Name: Stephen Rowe on Jul 13, 2008Comments: Prove they would face a worse risk of torture *than usual* - disgusting.Flag
-
14
Name: George Darroch on Jul 13, 2008Comments: This bill is a travesty against rights and justice.Flag
-
15
Name: Sean Broadley on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Anonymous on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Teressa Rooney on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Colin England on Jul 13, 2008Comments: This bill rides roughshod over our rights and asserts the infallibility of government officials. Both of which we've been at extreme pains to get rid of for the last few centuries. We really do not want or need a bill that takes us back to the Dark Ages.Flag
-
19
Name: Byron Clark on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Anonymous on Jul 13, 2008Comments: Come on Labour! You're better than this!Flag
-
21
Name: Edward Tonkin on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Matthew Whitehead on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Peter Green on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Jamie Craig on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Rex Widerstrom on Jul 13, 2008Comments: The removal of the right to the fundamental principles of natural justice and fairness can never be justified.Flag
-
26
Name: Pat McMullan on Jul 13, 2008Comments: As one whose anscestors were forced to migrate because of colonial policies in Nth Ireland, I find this bill deeply troubling.Flag
-
27
Name: Tui Head on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Anonymous on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Anonymous on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Joanna Duncan on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Ben Mitt on Jul 13, 2008Comments: The titled intent of this bill seems innocent enough, But upon further examination it becomes clear that there is a further agenda with a rather different intent underling this bills' proclaimed intent. and with the antismacking bill it seems obvious that there is a concerted effort to erode the New Zealand citizens civil freedoms. I start to view every action this government takes with a degree of suspicion, What other bills pass through under the guise of a good titled intent yet enact a very different outcome. Im a KIWI who used to say "she'll be right", but its not! its time for all of us to say "Not here mate."Flag
-
32
Name: Jacob Diggle on Jul 13, 2008Comments: I am a passionate Labour supporter but this is an absurd Bill and must not be passed. We have to manage our economy through these difficult time ans I understand that immigration is an important matter but we must defend the rights of NZers and this Bill does exactly the opposite!Flag
-
33
Name: Anonymous on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Will De Cleene on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: Christopher Nimmo on Jul 13, 2008Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Perrin Morrow on Jul 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Mikaere Curtis on Jul 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Benedict Chapman on Jul 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: David Hay on Jul 14, 2008Comments: There may, as the government asserts, be aspects of this bill which are praiseworthy, but there is so much which is ill-conceived and downright unjust that the bill cannot be allowed to proceed.Flag
-
40
Name: Andrew Tipton on Jul 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Jamie Norrish on Jul 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: James O'Neill on Jul 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Richard Parratt on Jul 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Anonymous on Jul 14, 2008Comments: I would like to have seen more publicity on this and have concerns about many things being pushed through Parliament. Lets see some money poured into the vital services to ensure that the current legislation and policies are funded and effective. In particular, personal safety in the streets.Flag
-
45
Name: Anonymous on Jul 14, 2008Comments: This Bill is both legally and morally unacceptable.Flag
-
46
Name: Anonymous on Jul 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Pearl Hanify on Jul 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Martin Steyn on Jul 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Jean Butcher on Jul 14, 2008Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Simon Bidwell on Jul 14, 2008Comments: As it stands, this Bill erodes basic common law rights and constitutes a rejection of the liberal internationalist values that NZ claims to stand for. While nation states still structure much of the movement and interaction of peoples, we should be striving to act on the principle that human rights transcend borders, not seeking to further restrict their ambit.Flag