Stop Shepherd Noise

Signatures 637 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 13 › »

1. 1
   Name: Luke Gilman on Dec 8, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Phoebe Tudor on Dec 8, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Carolyn Farb on Dec 8, 2008

   Comments: I find it unethical when developers ignore municipal processes to satisfy their own self serving purpose. Citizens need to speak out in order to protect historical spaces and spaces that speak to the human spirit.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 8, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Mary Adams on Dec 8, 2008

   Comments: this is a egregious act of deception and disregard for the neighborhood.

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Betty Trapp Chapman on Dec 8, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Sara Dodd-Spickelmier on Dec 8, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Joy Tober on Dec 8, 2008

   Comments: Notoriously known as a city ready and willing to demolish its history in the name of progress, Houston has little left in terms of tangible historic structures. Losing half of the River Oaks Shopping Center was devastating to preservationists and neighbors and this blatant disregard of city ordinances and again the needs and wishes of the community is just another slap in the face. While I agree that progress is always a step in the right direction, I do not feel that progress should happen at the expense of our local history. We should take pride in our past not erase it.

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: K on Dec 8, 2008

   Comments: Let them Build it. Free commerce.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Sharie Beale on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: This is another example of Builder Bulldozers!

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: David F. Beale on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Judy Waters on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Cathy Chapman on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Jack Stanley on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: This is deliberate deception on the part of Weingarten Realty and now an attempt to obtain a variance as a fait acompli. This will significantly impact those of us on Shepherd.

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Judy Nyquist on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: Please stop this unauthorized activity, it is an abomination!

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Wendy Burgower on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: this location is unacceptable. It is also deplorable that we, the people who live in this neighborhood have been so decieved.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Gloria Acker on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: I respectively request that the request for a variance permitting a wine bar and the encroaching segment that attends to it be denied.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Janet Spencer on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: William H. Kellar on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Pat Kennedy on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: I strongly oppose any changes to a structure which I believe should not have been built in the first place and which will affect the quality of life of those living in the area. The beautiful art-deco center that was destroyed should still be standing. Shame on you Weingarten Realty. You have a long history in Houston and should be more concerned about the historic and beautiful structures you are knocking down just to make money.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Bonita Ramirez on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Laurence C. Burns Jr. on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Ann Witucki on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Edith K. Wilson on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Mary Needham on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: As president of the Winlow Place Civic Club, I have been made aware of the many times developers in the city have been able to force their personal interests on the unsuspecting populace by acting first, pouring cement and then asking for forgiveness. At some point this ought simply to be stopped. It is reprehensible, devious, sleezebag behavior and at some point I devoutly hope the City will enforce the original expectations and stop granting variances just because these selfish outsiders might lose a few dollars. They deserve jail time, not a variance. Sincerely, Mary Needham

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Palmer Schooley on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Lauren Marie Wichelhaus on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: The one-way streets are particularly accident-proned when drunk drivers fail to recognize that they are in fact one-way streets. This type of establishment could only increase danger to families and resiodents of the neighborhood by encouraging more drunk-driving. which any bar establishment undoubtedly does whether indirectly or not. Help us to protect our neigborhood. Thanks, Lauren Marie

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Joshua Germanow on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: Help us to protect our neigborhood and reduce drunk-driving in accident-proned areas such as Shepherd since it is a one-way street as it goes through the neighborhood. Thanks, Joshua

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Harlan Wichelhaus on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: My daughter lives in this neighborhood and I want her to be safe and not have to worry about drunk-driving when she comes home from work late at night. Thanks, Harlan

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Kevin Bakos on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Lauren Germanow on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Brandon R Guzman on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: Weingarten Realty has not served the best interest of the City of Houston, nor have they been a good corporate citizen. The only interest Weingarten has is the short term profit of shareholders, not the long term, lasting value of historic properties. They should not be granted variances on modified portions of the project that clearly violated local codes/ordinances.

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Mary Swift on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Laurie Liedtke on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: John E. Cutler on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Jerry Blum on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: This is not good for the area.

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Roger Moore on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Gwin Bosco on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Margaret Lawler on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Mary Staton on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Margaret Lawler on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Hill Swift on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Barry Moore on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Angela Pramann on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: I am opposed to such a permit, especially in lieu of the fact that the developer made unauthorized changes to the original plans. If they are allowed such a retroactive permit, I am also concerned that the developer will then feel justified in making even more additional unauthorized & unacceptable changes.

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: Enough already!! No more end-run variances allowed by the City, commencing with the Weingarten Realty project!! They knew all along what they had in mind as to the design, and knew all along that the only way to get it through was by this sneaky end-run!!

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: Enough already!! No more end-run variances allowed by the City, commencing with the Weingarten Realty project!! They knew all along what they had in mind as to the design, and knew all along that the only way to get it through was by this sneaky end-run!!

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Goergia Foulard on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Michael Moore on Dec 8, 2008

    Comments: Weingarten Realty has already demonstrated that it has absolutely no regard for the well-being of its neighbors.

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 13 › »