Signatures 353 total
-
1
Name: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
2
Name: Nicholas Gracilla on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
3
Name: Gary Cziko on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
4
Name: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
5
Name: Dianne Harris on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
6
Name: Anni Poppen on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
7
Name: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
8
Name: Jolene McGrogan on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
9
Name: Julie Claussen on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
10
Name: Charles Rezk on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
11
Name: Deborah Cavanaugh-Grant on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
12
Name: Anne H. Silvis on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
13
Name: Molly Dolan on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
14
Name: Jennifer Gunji on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
15
Name: Laura West on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
16
Name: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
17
Name: Carol Siempelkkamp on Oct 5, 2009Comments: Stop Oympyian Extension. It is not needed and is a total waste of money and an outrageous use of prime agriculture land to say nothing of destroying historical value.
-
18
Name: Barbara Lawrence on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
19
Name: Joyce Flaherty on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
20
Name: Jennifer D. Miller on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
21
Name: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
22
Name: Elizabeth Vanderveer on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
23
Name: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
24
Name: Sarah Bell on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
25
Name: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
26
Name: Joseph Grisham on Oct 5, 2009Comments: Keep sustainability, keep the farms. Put the road elsewhere. Thank you.
-
27
Name: Julia A. Bradt on Oct 5, 2009Comments: Alternatives to constructing Olympian Drive thru agricultural land must be found. This is an important environmental and historical issue. Rantoul is a much better choice and needs the economic benefit.
-
28
Name: Rebecca Lynn Wachtel on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
29
Name: Jeanne Vega-Byrnes on Oct 5, 2009Comments: A reconsideration of plans made in the previous decade to determine whether they are still appropriate for the present seems like an obvious requirement and a step that could prevent waste.
-
30
Name: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
31
Name: Kathryn Marshak on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
32
Name: Marcia Dellenbach on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
33
Name: Molly Murphy on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
34
Name: Tim Johnston on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
35
Name: Celeste Coverdill on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
36
Name: Don Wallace on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
37
Name: Nancy Rygg on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
38
Name: Charles I. Delman on Oct 5, 2009Comments: Extending Olympian Drive is completely inappropriate given the need to contain (and eventually eliminate) sprawl, reduce the energy needed for transportation (by making our urban areas more compact and concentrated, filling in existing urban space), support locally-produced food (which is fresher and requires less energy for transport, as well as significantly enhancing the local economy), and preserve agricultural land to feed ourselves and future generations. The prime agricultural land of Champaign County is too precious to pave!
-
39
Name: Carrie Nahabedian on Oct 5, 2009Comments: I am profoundly against construction in this prime and valuable farm land
-
40
Name: Tera Miller on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
41
Name: Robyn Walter on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
42
Name: Suzanne Linder on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
43
Name: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
44
Name: Rosellen Bohlen on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
45
Name: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
46
Name: Nick Huemmer on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
47
Name: Cheryl Modzelewski on Oct 5, 2009Comments: Please stop the extension of Olympian Drive through prime farmland.
-
48
Name: Eliana Brown on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
49
Name: Jeane Cox-Meuser on Oct 5, 2009Comments:
-
50
Name: Marilyn And Phil Best on Oct 5, 2009Comments: We must protect our agricultural landds and green economic development.