Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 475 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 10 › »

  1. 1
    Name: Nancy Kerns on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country:
    Comments: I'm all for a downtown theater, especially in the historic building. But more than 3-4 screens is excessive for this town.
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Patricia Bail on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Vincent Bail on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Zsuzsanna Laszlo on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Lark McMullin-Ramirez on May 26, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments: We do not need a megaplex 10 screen or parking complex over three stories high. At one time the city ordinance stated no structure over three stories high. I believe that should be kept and NO ONE has the right to go against it.
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Ani Dimusheva on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Laurence Padway on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country:
    Comments: Its just too much development for this area.
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Susan Maddock on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Margie Joyce on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: YES...I am totally against this theater/parking lot project!
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Linda Hanson on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: We need projects in this town that compliment existing structures, not dominate them.
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Michael Schiess on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country:
    Comments: I don't understand why we can't take this a step at a time. Instead of building a multi screen complex and parking garage, how about restoring the Alameda to a 3 screen and see how that works. If a bigger venue is needed, we'll know, but to jump headfirst into an extremely risky venture with taxpayers money and no vote on it is irresponsible at best!
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Tom Billings on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Kevin Carrington on May 26, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments: I agree the proposed plan is not accepted by a majority of the parents and residents of Alameda
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Kenneth Johnson on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Julie-ann Cesareo on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Gyozo Lorincz on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Leah Lawrence on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: JESSICA HERINGER on May 26, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Natasha Miller on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Nick Tzvetkov on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Gerald Minot on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Clarice Minot on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Robert Minot on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Robert M. Woolley on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: Not another taxpayer money hole and it is way out of scale for the area and community.
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Kathee Walton on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Brad Walton on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Kathy Mcintire on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Michael Rocca on May 26, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Karen Carlson on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Noel Folsom on May 26, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments: This is the most ill conceived idea, from a long line of ill conceived ideas, this current council has come up with.
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Robert Lundy-Paine on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: This theatre project is not in line with the community of Alameda. This would be the same as building a Target or Home Depot at South Shore
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Mary Orr on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: Stop plans for building an oversized multi-theater complex and parking structure per this petition's request.
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Gary Longoria on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Miyuki Roberts on May 26, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Pam Deremiah on May 26, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Mary Frankel on May 26, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Emma Pigott on May 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Pamela Sibley on May 27, 2005
    State: CA
    Country:
    Comments: Less is more. Dividing the original site into three was pushing the limits. Don't agree to a no-compete clause.
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Sonia Fleischman on May 27, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Diane Leibel on May 27, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Jason Rehm on May 27, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Robert Bietz on May 27, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: I live five blocks from the theater and am an avid moviegoer. I always avoid megaplexes when I go to the theater in favor of smaller theaters like the Orinda, the Oaks or the Piedmont. My family and I would not use a megaplex -- for the type of movies they run as well as for the crowds they attract. We would, however, actively utilize a 3-screen "neighborhood" type theater. We would also miss being able to see Twin Towers beautiful architecture from Park Street (after the parking structure is built). Think, Alameda leaders, Think!!
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Diane Voss on May 27, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: Let's not destroy Alameda's small-town appeal. This huge megaplex is not needed or wanted in Alameda. And we surely don;t want to see a 6 level gargae in the downtown area. This will not add to the beauty that is Alameda. This is not what Alameda is all about. We are small-town!
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Manya Morris on May 27, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: Please reconsider the location. I am certainly not against a movieplex opening in Alameda however, I am concerned about the location. Why not put it where there is space-Old Alameda Point.
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: John Cavalli on May 27, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Janice Cavalli on May 27, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Johanna Lafferty on May 27, 2005
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Kimberley Russell on May 27, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: I disagree with a megaplex being built in the downtown area of Alameda. This will create huge problems for the local people, and unwanted traffic in the area.
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Quezada Araceli on May 27, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: Constructing a megaplex in Alameda might bring in revenue in the shortrun; but in the longrun, you will lose people who love the quiet, small town feel of this pristine town. In the longrun, this will ruin what Alameda is and stands for.
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Lucy Gigli on May 28, 2005
    State:
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 10 › »

Sign Petition Now!

Sponsored links