Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 303 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 7 »

  1. 51
    Name: Lin Wellford on Mar 3, 2013
    Comments: Please reconsider anything that may impact this amazing and fragile resource! This is a National River and it is up to all of us to protect its watershed from degradation.
    Flag
  2. 52
    Name: Kathy Leonard on Mar 4, 2013
    Comments: Pollution of water and air is not what I want for my grandchildren. The Buffalo is a National treasure. Monoculture hog farms have incredible waste not to mention unnatural torture for the hogs. No Thanks!
    Flag
  3. 53
    Name: William J. Matthews on Mar 4, 2013
    Comments: I am a university professor, and an expert on native fishes in the Ozark Mountains. Without doubt, waste from such a hog farm would, if released into Big Creek, have potential to be very harmful to the diverse native fishes.
    Flag
  4. 54
    Name: Carey Woods on Mar 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 55
    Name: Robyn Jones on Mar 5, 2013
    Comments: Neil Compton would be ashamed of not fighting harder for what he fought so hard for in the 70s. We live near the river, and just can not understand this at all. Politics Politics.
    Flag
  6. 56
    Name: Scott M. Jones on Mar 5, 2013
    Comments: The Buffalo River is the crown jewel of our State. Any development in the watershed of this resource should be carefully considered.
    Flag
  7. 57
    Name: Anneke Andries on Mar 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 58
    Name: Laura Jones on Mar 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 59
    Name: Shannon Jones on Mar 5, 2013
    Comments: Please don't contaminate our river.
    Flag
  10. 60
    Name: James H Bonds on Mar 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 61
    Name: Christy Cheatham on Mar 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 62
    Name: Alicia Eberhard on Mar 5, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 63
    Name: Melissia Gunter on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments: I grew up on a large hog farm and know first hand the mess run off can cause. They need to have holding tanks and reuse the waste as fertilizer.
    Flag
  14. 64
    Name: Deborah Ellison on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 65
    Name: Yolanda Schultes on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 66
    Name: Voicila Gabriela on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 67
    Name: Chantal Buslot on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 68
    Name: Jasmina Cuk on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 69
    Name: Nicole Weber on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 70
    Name: Sophie Poe on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 71
    Name: Theodore Spachidakis on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 72
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 73
    Name: Sille Melanie on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 74
    Name: Beth Jacks on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 75
    Name: Amanda Reagan on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments: PLEASE do not do this!!! I grew up on this river and it is one of the most pristine and beautiful resources we have!!!
    Flag
  26. 76
    Name: Franziska Eber on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 77
    Name: Jack Kroeck on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments: opposed. I raise hogs in small numbers and would never want to be near a large operation or have one in the watershed of a "protected" river because I couldn't assure it wouldn't have an eventual impact there.
    Flag
  28. 78
    Name: Caroline Campbell on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 79
    Name: Clifton Calvert on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 80
    Name: Doreen Herrmann on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 81
    Name: Natacha PENET on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 82
    Name: Troy Gittings on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments: Quit trying to profiteer on the back of our environment.
    Flag
  33. 83
    Name: Jacqueline on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments: animals should not be confined in a building without air, no sun, no greenery.
    Flag
  34. 84
    Name: Catherine Lyon on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments: And once, again, God shakes his head in amazement of how little regard you have for the gifts we have been given. Float the Buffalo before you decide it isn't worth protecting. Maybe you'll understand what stewardship means or maybe you'll capsize and hit your head on a rock.
    Flag
  35. 85
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 86
    Name: T. Cabrera on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 87
    Name: Donna Hamilton on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 88
    Name: Rita Andrews on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 89
    Name: Christopher Evans on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 90
    Name: Isaac Szabo on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 91
    Name: Elisabeth Bechmann on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 92
    Name: Laurence Henot on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 93
    Name: BROUSTE on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 94
    Name: Nathan Charles on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments: I am an Environmental Engineer that specializes in water quality and also spend a lot of time on the Buffalo River. I am outraged that ADEQ would even consider this type of land use within the watershed. NO industrial farm should be allowed anywhere within the Buffalo River watershed. This is a prestine natural stream and it needs to stay that way. Way too many people have fought to preserve this rare natural beauty, and the benefits of preserving natural state of the river far out weigh to little income hog farmers would see. Subsidize the farmers if you have to, but do NOT screw up my River!!!
    Flag
  45. 95
    Name: Melissa Saltsman on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 96
    Name: Wendy Smith on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 97
    Name: Alexandr Yantselovskiy on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 98
    Name: Theodorsia Fisher on Mar 6, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 99
    Name: Daniel Tyrrell on Mar 7, 2013
    Comments: No way this should happen
    Flag
  50. 100
    Name: Jeff Jenkins on Mar 7, 2013
    Comments: leave it to arkansas to redefine 'Enviromental quality'
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 7 »

Sponsored links