Stop Heathrow Expansion

Signatures 17140 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 343 › »

1. 151
   Name: Valerie Kember on Nov 1, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 1, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Paul Sadler on Nov 1, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 1, 2007

   Comments: It will make London a real mess. Air Quality levels are already terrible - more of this will make London horrible. Kids already have terrible levels of asthma because of it. Wide swathes of previously unaffected London (and I mean posh areas too) will become completely unviable due to noise and pollution. We're be ruining the jewel in the crown of our tourism industry. Heath levels will drop. And I thought we were progressive on climate change This cod economic (ie recognised only by BAA consultantcy) silliness must stop. The people must stop it. Vote it out.

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 1, 2007

   Comments: more expansion is an accident waiting to happen

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Robert & Vivien Cail on Nov 1, 2007

   Comments: We are opposed to any more expansion at LHR. Noise & air pollution is already out of control, not to mention safety. More planes in the sky will be the result of a horiffic accident, how will we cope.

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Dee Doocey AM on Nov 1, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Dee Doocey AM on Nov 1, 2007

   Comments: Chair, Economic Development Culture Sport & Tourism, London Assembly

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Darren Johnson AM on Nov 1, 2007

   Comments: Green Party Member of the London Assembly

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Janice Byrnes on Nov 1, 2007

    Comments: I have lived in the cranford area all my life i am 60yrs old now and if they change the flight pattans to all day life would be un bearable to live under planes every 2seconds plus the air is bad now what would it be like then

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Richard Barnes on Nov 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: DAVIDEDMONDSDA on Nov 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Davidedmonds on Nov 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Caroline Black on Nov 1, 2007

    Comments: we have to get to grips what we are doing to the environment and what we are doing to people's health More noise, when people are trying to live and sleep; increased traffic levels on motorways and local troads ferrying more passengers than ever to the airport; emissions affecting the wuality of the local air - my allotment is under the flight path at Boston Manor - and while it has never been exactly peaceful any more air traffic will make it seriously difficult to hear yourself think stop the madness - let people have some peace and less pressure - more air travel is retrogressive not progressive planning

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Cllr Richard Barnes AM on Nov 1, 2007

    Comments: London Assembly Member for Ealing and Hillingdon

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Angie Bray on Nov 1, 2007

    Comments: Enough's enough. Heathrow cannot continue to expand. It is already blighting the lives of too many West Londoners.

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 1, 2007

    Comments: Stop the expansion.

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: John Savery on Nov 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Geoff Pope AM on Nov 1, 2007

    Comments: Expansion will cause huge pollution, congestion and noise impacts. Alternative strategies including high speed rail anf flight taxation must be accelerated.

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Cllr. Richard Barnes A.M. on Nov 1, 2007

    Comments: For many years we have opposed the expansion of Heathrow and now the end game will soon start. It is essential that the fight goes on - until we win.

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Philip Booth on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Pobrien on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Michael Gibbons on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Elizabeth Greaves on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Martin Whiteside on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: N Moore on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments: Circling planes are already encroaching on Northolt's airspace - the new runway would be at the country's busiest motorway junction (M25/M4). How long before the nightmare accident happens. With the M40 and the M3 nearby this part of Britian is now the most polluted.

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Peter Green on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: S Blandon on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: John Anthony Firkins on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Capt. Ray Smith on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Keith Rapley on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments: Please actively support all movements attempting to relocalize our lives

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments: The pollution is bad enough at the moment let alone after expansion!!!!!!!!! I live nearby, so know what I am talking about. Nuala P Williams

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments: terminal 4 was meant to be the last now we have terminal 5. This can't go on. People's lives are blighted by this relentless expansion at Heathrow. The government ought to be looking to improve land transport at the expense of domestic flights.

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Susan Jappie on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Susan Jappie on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments: We live in Buckinghamshire and are woken around 11pm by aircraft flying low out of Heathrow each night. They have multiplied in number recently.

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Richard Bossons on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: William Charles on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Rachel Stark on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Angela Sharp on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments: I live directly under the southern runway flightpath approach, in the TW3 area, and I will be extremely affected by the proposed end to runway alternation in particular. Our current half day of peace and quiet is what makes living in this area worthwhile. During it we can hear the birds sing, and hear eachother talk when sitting in the garden. We can 'hear' the peace. No amount of triple glazing grants gets away from the fact that we, as residents and human beings, have a right to use our gardens and to live our lives outside as well as in, without fear of constant noise or gaseous pollution ruining our health. Children, too, have a right to play outside, whether at home or in the school playground, outside. And they don't deserve to have to put up with shut up windows even in the middle of a (climate-change-induced) hot summer, just so they can hear their teacher. Introducing mixed mode will probably affect the equity of our home and will make our life pretty unpleasant, as there will - in reality - only be about 5 hours peace in 24 hours (from 11pm till 4am), and that's only if the airport doesn't apply again for increased 'official' night flights (not allowing for the unofficial increase reported recently which is iniquitous).

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments: The noise, consequent disturbance of sleep and pollution levels must not get any worse than now. Local residents feel no benefits from the so far limited improvements in aircraft technology and are entitled to expect improvement in their quality of life.

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments: We do not need to expand Heathrow further - the government should be concentrating on improving the alternative modes of transport not supporting the growth of the most harmful means of travel!

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Sarah Clayton on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments: Further expansion of Heathrow is not needed, and will do immense harm to the local environment, as well as making a mockery of national policies on tackling climate change.

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Sarah Clayton on Nov 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Francis Sirl on Nov 3, 2007

    Comments: As a resident of Richmond with 2 small children our nights are already disturbed and our children regularly wake from 2.30 am onwards when a long haul (and noisy) 747 comes overhead. I believe that it is every persons right (and need) to an undisturbed nights sleep to avoid exhaustion and undue stress in their lives. Ening runway alternation and/or increasing night flights would make live intolerable. Thank you to HACAN for all the work you do to help residents effected by Heathrow and do please keep up the good fight. MPs - please listen (isn't that what Gordon Brown said he was going to do post Blair).

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2007

    Comments: As a mother of 2 and expecting my 3rd child sleep is essential. Please consider the residents and the environment, and show that politicians can in fact listen to the people they were elected by.

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Elizabeth Neville on Nov 3, 2007

    Comments: I have only lived in Isleworth for 2 years but the early flights wake me in the early hours of the morning even with double glazing. For people who have lived and are growing up here this constant noise pollution must disrupt their lives. Carries need to be encouraged to use planes with lower noise and emission levels and all of us need to consider whether we can reduce our dependency on air travel.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 343 › »