Signatures 17140 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 343 › »
-
101
Name: Anonymous on Oct 30, 2007Comments: expansion of heathrow will be the death knell to the local areaFlag
-
102
Name: Adrian Flook on Oct 30, 2007Comments:Flag
-
103
Name: Adrian Flook on Oct 30, 2007Comments:Flag
-
104
Name: Susan Murray on Oct 30, 2007Comments: The government cannot talk about its green credentials and its efforts to tackle climate change whilst still going on supporting expnsion of airport capacity in the UKFlag
-
105
Name: Susan Murray on Oct 30, 2007Comments:Flag
-
106
Name: Anonymous on Oct 30, 2007Comments: Apart from the loss of homes, extra take-off and landings, what about traffic to and from the airport. The M25 is constantly at a standstill around peak hours and holiday times. The pollution from the extra vehicles going to and from the airport should also be under consideration. We don't need another runway in this part of the country, move it to a less congested part as not everybody who wants to commute by plane needs to arrive or depart from Heathrow. More internal flights are needed to disperse passengers around the country. Wake up government before you destroy London and it's surrounding areas for good.Flag
-
107
Name: Mrs J Boorer on Oct 30, 2007Comments:Flag
-
108
Name: Christian Ball on Oct 30, 2007Comments: This is madness I already enjoy the benefits of the northern runway - to add to it by doubling the number of flights and sandwich Chiswick into a three lane super aircraft highway for 70% of my life - what planet do these Ministers live onFlag
-
109
Name: Dave Robins on Oct 30, 2007Comments: It is completely insane to even contemplate the expansion of Heathrow.West London cannot cope with the increased noise,pollution or traffic congestion it will cause.Enough is enough.Flag
-
110
Name: Ben Khosa on Oct 30, 2007Comments:Flag
-
111
Name: Caroloyn Rampton on Oct 30, 2007Comments:Flag
-
112
Name: Jeremy Elloy on Oct 30, 2007Comments:Flag
-
113
Name: Cllr Suzette Nicholson on Oct 30, 2007Comments:Flag
-
114
Name: Shas Sheehan on Oct 30, 2007Comments:Flag
-
115
Name: James Willis on Oct 30, 2007Comments: the end of alternation and increased noise is farcical.... try living under the flight path.Flag
-
116
Name: Cllr Barbara Reid, LB Hounslow on Oct 30, 2007Comments: Heathrow would almost double in size and current runway alternation would be lost. It's and intolerable burden to expect people to take. We must all work together to defeat the government's plans.Flag
-
117
Name: Nick Carthew on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
118
Name: Nick Carthew on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
119
Name: Shona Priestley on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
120
Name: Carole Bonifas on Oct 31, 2007Comments: This proposal is total madness and will destroy any remaining vestiges of reasonable quality of life for west London.Flag
-
121
Name: Carole on Oct 31, 2007Comments: This proposal is total madness; expansion should be targetted at regions which need the economic boost, not at overcrowded west London!Flag
-
122
Name: John Waterman on Oct 31, 2007Comments: the IPCC and other leading scientists have reached consensus on the existance and drastic affects of climate change. A future generation (or maybe 4) will look back on this decision, should it go ahead, and wonder how so few could make a decision against so many. It is lunacy. It's short-term profit over long-term sustainability. Well, I won't have it!Flag
-
123
Name: Andrew Horsler on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
124
Name: Anonymous on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
125
Name: DAVID CORNWELL on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
126
Name: DAVID CORNWELL on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
127
Name: Joan Bennett on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
128
Name: Samantha Carwenne Oxby on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
129
Name: Samantha Carwenne Oxby on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
130
Name: Richard Jennings on Oct 31, 2007Comments: I already live under the flightpath. Any further expansion or changes to the alternation of use of runways will make life unbearable and is totally unacceptable.Flag
-
131
Name: Mr P Dabrowski on Oct 31, 2007Comments: Further expansion of Heathrow can only destroy both individual people's lives, communities in general and any negligible credibility our politicians still have if this is allowed to go ahead contrary to all assurances made at previous enquiries for Terminals 4 & 5Flag
-
132
Name: Peter Lockley on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
133
Name: Anonymous on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
134
Name: George Greenwood on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
135
Name: J.coombs on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
136
Name: J Coombs on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
137
Name: Anonymous on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
138
Name: Yvonne Johnson on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
139
Name: M. J. Morgan on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
140
Name: Peter Ludbrook on Oct 31, 2007Comments: BAA have consistently lied to us every time Heathrow has been expanded. They have to be stopped.Flag
-
141
Name: Johnny Denis on Oct 31, 2007Comments: We should be reducing total numbers of flightsFlag
-
142
Name: Simon Beards on Oct 31, 2007Comments: We don't need more air travellers or the pollution that will increase dramatically. We need people to travel less so our planet can recover from the rapid deterioration we have caused over recent years. Air travel should shrink not expand.Flag
-
143
Name: Dr Kaihsu Tai on Oct 31, 2007Comments:Flag
-
144
Name: Anonymous on Nov 1, 2007Comments: We have become hostages of Heathrow profits. We pay more attention to people coming in London than the ones living in. Where to live in London without having a plane roaring/going through your living room Yes, against the expansion, increase fo flights.Flag
-
145
Name: Svetlana Jokic on Nov 1, 2007Comments: Absolutely against any expansion and increase in flights! The sky over London is completely staturated. We need our own piece of a sky!Flag
-
146
Name: Debra Rolfe on Nov 1, 2007Comments:Flag
-
147
Name: Anonymous on Nov 1, 2007Comments: The economic case for expansion of Heathrow has not been proven - it is one of those well versed myths. The Government has admitted in parliamentary questions that this is particularly the case for night flights. At all costs the Government must keep runway alternation. It preserves a quality of life for people living locally.Flag
-
148
Name: Alan Marlow on Nov 1, 2007Comments: We totally apposed to the expansion on Heathrow.Flag
-
149
Name: Kathy Tracey on Nov 1, 2007Comments:Flag
-
150
Name: Michael K Kember on Nov 1, 2007Comments:Flag