| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 151 | Valerie Kember | |
| 152 | Anonymous | |
| 153 | Paul Sadler | |
| 154 | Anonymous | It will make London a real mess.
Air Quality levels are already terrible - more of this will make London horrible. Kids already have terrible levels of asthma because of it. Wide swathes of previously unaffected London (and I mean posh areas too) will become completely unviable due to noise and pollution.
We're be ruining the jewel in the crown of our tourism industry. Heath levels will drop. And I thought we were progressive on climate change?
This cod economic (ie recognised only by BAA consultantcy) silliness must stop. The people must stop it.
Vote it out. |
| 155 | Anonymous | more expansion is an accident waiting to happen |
| 156 | Robert & Vivien Cail | We are opposed to any more expansion at LHR. Noise & air pollution is already out of control, not to mention safety. More planes in the sky will be the result of a horiffic accident, how will we cope. |
| 157 | Dee Doocey AM | |
| 158 | Dee Doocey AM | Chair, Economic Development Culture Sport & Tourism, London Assembly |
| 159 | Darren Johnson AM | Green Party Member of the London Assembly |
| 160 | janice Byrnes | I have lived in the cranford area all my life i am 60yrs old now and if they change the flight pattans to all day life would be un bearable to live under planes every 2seconds plus the air is bad now what would it be like then |
| 161 | richard barnes | |
| 162 | DAVIDEDMONDSDA | |
| 163 | davidedmonds | |
| 164 | Caroline Black | we have to get to grips what we are doing to the environment and what we are doing to people's health
More noise, when people are trying to live and sleep; increased traffic levels on motorways and local troads ferrying more passengers than ever to the airport; emissions affecting the wuality of the local air - my allotment is under the flight path at Boston Manor - and while it has never been exactly peaceful any more air traffic will make it seriously difficult to hear yourself think
stop the madness - let people have some peace and less pressure - more air travel is retrogressive not progressive planning |
| 165 | cllr Richard Barnes AM | London Assembly Member for Ealing and Hillingdon |
| 166 | angie bray | Enough's enough. Heathrow cannot continue to expand. It is already blighting the lives of too many West Londoners. |
| 167 | Anonymous | Stop the expansion. |
| 168 | Anonymous | |
| 169 | Anonymous | |
| 170 | John Savery | |
| 171 | Geoff Pope AM | Expansion will cause huge pollution, congestion and noise impacts. Alternative strategies including high speed rail anf flight taxation must be accelerated. |
| 172 | Cllr. Richard Barnes A.M. | For many years we have opposed the expansion of Heathrow and now the end game will soon start. It is essential that the fight goes on - until we win. |
| 173 | Philip Booth | |
| 174 | pobrien | |
| 175 | Michael Gibbons | |
| 176 | Elizabeth Greaves | |
| 177 | Martin Whiteside | |
| 178 | N Moore | Circling planes are already encroaching on Northolt's airspace - the new runway would be at the country's busiest motorway junction (M25/M4). How long before the nightmare accident happens. With the M40 and the M3 nearby this part of Britian is now the most polluted. |
| 179 | Peter Green | |
| 180 | S Blandon | |
| 181 | John Anthony Firkins | |
| 182 | Capt. Ray Smith | |
| 183 | keith rapley | Please actively support all movements attempting to relocalize our lives |
| 184 | Anonymous | The pollution is bad enough at the moment let alone after expansion!!!!!!!!! I live nearby, so know what I am talking about.
Nuala P Williams |
| 185 | Anonymous | terminal 4 was meant to be the last now we have terminal 5. This can't go on. People's lives are blighted by this relentless expansion at Heathrow. The government ought to be looking to improve land transport at the expense of domestic flights. |
| 186 | Susan Jappie | |
| 187 | Susan Jappie | |
| 188 | Anonymous | We live in Buckinghamshire and are woken around 11pm by aircraft flying low out of Heathrow each night. They have multiplied in number recently. |
| 189 | Richard Bossons | |
| 190 | William Charles | |
| 191 | Rachel Stark | |
| 192 | Angela Sharp | I live directly under the southern runway flightpath approach, in the TW3 area, and I will be extremely affected by the proposed end to runway alternation in particular. Our current half day of peace and quiet is what makes living in this area worthwhile. During it we can hear the birds sing, and hear eachother talk when sitting in the garden. We can 'hear' the peace. No amount of triple glazing grants gets away from the fact that we, as residents and human beings, have a right to use our gardens and to live our lives outside as well as in, without fear of constant noise or gaseous pollution ruining our health. Children, too, have a right to play outside, whether at home or in the school playground, outside. And they don't deserve to have to put up with shut up windows even in the middle of a (climate-change-induced?) hot summer, just so they can hear their teacher. Introducing mixed mode will probably affect the equity of our home and will make our life pretty unpleasant, as there will - in reality - only be about 5 hours peace in 24 hours (from 11pm till 4am), and that's only if the airport doesn't apply again for increased 'official' night flights (not allowing for the unofficial increase reported recently which is iniquitous). |
| 193 | Anonymous | The noise, consequent disturbance of sleep and pollution levels must not get any worse than now. Local residents feel no benefits from the so far limited improvements in aircraft technology and are entitled to expect improvement in their quality of life. |
| 194 | Anonymous | |
| 195 | Anonymous | We do not need to expand Heathrow further - the government should be concentrating on improving the alternative modes of transport not supporting the growth of the most harmful means of travel! |
| 196 | Sarah Clayton | Further expansion of Heathrow is not needed, and will do immense harm to the local environment, as well as making a mockery of national policies on tackling climate change. |
| 197 | Sarah Clayton | |
| 198 | Francis Sirl | As a resident of Richmond with 2 small children our nights are already disturbed and our children regularly wake from 2.30 am onwards when a long haul (and noisy) 747 comes overhead. I believe that it is every persons right (and need) to an undisturbed nights sleep to avoid exhaustion and undue stress in their lives. Ening runway alternation and/or increasing night flights would make live intolerable. Thank you to HACAN for all the work you do to help residents effected by Heathrow and do please keep up the good fight. MPs - please listen (isn't that what Gordon Brown said he was going to do post Blair?). |
| 199 | Anonymous | As a mother of 2 and expecting my 3rd child sleep is essential. Please consider the residents and the environment, and show that politicians can in fact listen to the people they were elected by. |
| 200 | Elizabeth Neville | I have only lived in Isleworth for 2 years but the early flights wake me in the early hours of the morning even with double glazing. For people who have lived and are growing up here this constant noise pollution must disrupt their lives. Carries need to be encouraged to use planes with lower noise and emission levels and all of us need to consider whether we can reduce our dependency on air travel. |