Powered by iPetitions - start your online petition now

 

Signatures | Total: 17,032

 

# NameComments
16751 Annette OliverThe environmental damage of air travel needs restricting.
16752 Joanne NelsonPollution,[ noise or air] recession, the uprooting of communities are all effects of this proposed expansion.It not necessary nor is it being demanded by businesses such as TNT and DHL. who are downshifting their operations. Air traffic should be discouraged not encouraged or silently supported.
16753 AnonymousMe & my family all fully support opposition to the Heathrow expansion.
16754 Howard Arrowsmith
16755 Tony Jackson
16756 DianaI dont think the government is thinking of the impact another terminal will have on the environment...the lose to peoples homes, and will increae on the CO2 emmissions that they are trying to reduce......NO TO THRID RUNWAY...HEATHROW HAS ENOUGH
16757 Anonymous
16758 Ben Miller
16759 evelyn mary gauntmy maiden name is Page-Chestney. My great grandmother is buried in Harmondsworth churchyard, as are my paternal grandparents and very many other members of my family. The latest was last year, Charles Page-Chestney in the family plot. What will happen to them?
16760 Jim Driscoll
16761 Katerina SW7Ask most people who live in London and they will tell you that besides "green reasons" they simply hate planes flying over their homes like taxis, every minute!
16762 Ryan DBy having constant traffic over our heads you are subjecting us to pollution and possible accidents.
16763 chris murphy
16764 Karine Waldron
16765 Ranee Sidhu
16766 AnonymousI think it would be bad for the environment and bad for the people who live around the area.
16767 Rekha Patel
16768 Anonymous
16769 Ruth BrooksPlease show some commitment to a green agenda
16770 Janet Brooks
16771 John Brooks
16772 Kasia
16773 Daniel Rutland
16774 James Townsend
16775 Richard AyresGreatly enhanced rail links with high speed trains should replace most flights to Europe
16776 Anonymous
16777 Lauren Roffey
16778 Waseem BalochThe world desperately needs alternatives to air travel, especially short-haul air travel, in order to seriously address climate change issues. If the true cost of damage to the climate were added as a "climate tax" to the cost of air tickets, would there really be the demand for air travel that would justify the 3rd runway? The costs of damage to the climate and the ensuing costs have to be paid by someone - why not those that cause the damage?!
16779 Ewan Cass-Kavanagh
16780 Chris PickardWhat comment can one make - it is thoughtless and does not take into consideration the huge body against the expansion. All the government are trying to do is curry favour with BAA and the Airlines
16781 Luke BermanWe only have one planet how can they even be considering a third runway. If you ask people which they would prefer, a planet or some extra flight journeys i think u know what they would say. Stop destroying the planet we are part of it, work with it not against it.
16782 Martin Greenwood
16783 Adit Gos
16784 Sam Rogers
16785 AnonymousI want to sihn the pertition
16786 Anonymous
16787 SIMON, ESSEXGREENHOUSE GAS WILL DESTROY THE WHOLE PLANET. IT IS ALREADY KILLING POLAR BEARS AND WILDLIFE AS THE ICE IS MELTING RAPIDLY. THE OZONE LAYER HAS A HUGE HOLE IN IT AND IT IS GROWING. WE NEED TO REDUCE GREENHOUSE GAS NOT MAKE IT WORSE. ARE LABOURS BRAINS IN THEIR A***? THE CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT DO NOT WANT A THIRD RUNWAY. HEATHROW IS ALREADY BIG ENOUGH. WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER RUNWAY. THEY ARE COMPLETE IDIOTS.
16788 Chris Marshall
16789 Thomas HeatonWONT SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN !!!!!!!!
16790 Glyn Towers
16791 john lowersonit is a waste of money, involving destruction of exisiting communities
16792 Barbara WhiteA 3rd runway is not the answer.
16793 Barbara WhiteA 3rd runway is not the answer.
16794 Denise PotterThe consultation was a scam! I will vote against this government because of the appalling decision to go ahead with the expansion of Heathrow.
16795 Anonymous
16796 Ben Haslamonce again, the government is showing the people of this country utter contempt by ploughing ahead with an absurd and unnecessary move to which the majority of the public are opposed!
16797 Julie Bannister
16798 Carolyn Martin
16799 AnonymousMore planes means more carbon emissions. Less runways means fewer planes.
16800 Anonymous

 

Signatures | Total: 17,032