| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 16051 | caroline crowther | Stop the pollution and emissions please |
| 16052 | lucas amin | |
| 16053 | Jan Gerhards | High-speed rail networks are the answer! |
| 16054 | Karl Eastham | |
| 16055 | Ilona Byrnes | |
| 16056 | Anonymous | |
| 16057 | Anonymous | |
| 16058 | Anonymous | |
| 16059 | Anonymous | |
| 16060 | john thorpe | the proposed expansion of heathrow would be an act of sheer environmental vandalism at a time when greenhouse gas emissions have to be drastically reduced |
| 16061 | Anonymous | |
| 16062 | Anonymous | |
| 16063 | Ian Hylands | |
| 16064 | Jonathan Buckner | |
| 16065 | Alice Adams | It is a disgrace that the quality of life of hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people is blighted by noise from Heathrow. The economic case is unconvincing; a third of Heathrow passengers are transit passengers, so economic benefits accrue to BAA and not to the Londoners who have to pay the price in noise and pollution. |
| 16066 | sophie Allen | |
| 16067 | Keith Whittaker | |
| 16068 | Steve Poole | |
| 16069 | Robert Hughes | |
| 16070 | Robert Hughes | |
| 16071 | Christopher Perman | |
| 16072 | Alison Wragg | Heathrow is big enough already, look at the chaos caused by the opening of Terminal 5! |
| 16073 | carly | |
| 16074 | Nicholas Barrett | |
| 16075 | Tanya Jay | |
| 16076 | Andreas Kornevall | Its time to stop and think about the consequences of expansion and economic development. In the face of climate change, economic development has taken a whole new meaning - the development today cannot ignore the impact it is having on the biosphere. |
| 16077 | Joseph Ansah | I live in Brentford. Living in the areas surrounding Heathrow is already noisy & congested enough without further increasing our burden. Further blighting the surrounding areas of outstanding natural beauty with more flights for what we all know are primarily financial reasons is absurd & totally unnecessary. A line needs to be drawn. NO! NO! NO! |
| 16078 | Joseph Ansah | I live in Brentford. Living in the areas surrounding Heathrow is already noisy & congested enough without further increasing our burden. Further blighting the surrounding areas of outstanding natural beauty with more flights for what we all know are primarily financial reasons is absurd & totally unnecessary. A line needs to be drawn. NO! NO! NO! |
| 16079 | Ian Hamond | |
| 16080 | Ian Hammond | |
| 16081 | Rosemary Summerhayes | |
| 16082 | Anonymous | |
| 16083 | Michael Crow | |
| 16084 | chris Walker | |
| 16085 | Francis James Parry | |
| 16086 | Stephanie Bean | Expansion of Heathrow would predominantly be to accommodate hub traffic which generates little if any income for the surrounding area so why should the local area be made to suffer the land loss to BAA & yet more flights. |
| 16087 | Drusilla Wieloch | |
| 16088 | Dr Paul Lynn | Stop this nonsense and put the investment into better railways. |
| 16089 | Tom Giles | The government talk about reducing CO2 emissions and talk green while at the same time proposing airport expansions. this is simply not acceptable |
| 16090 | Sarah harris | |
| 16091 | Anonymous | |
| 16092 | Anonymous | |
| 16093 | Anonymous | |
| 16094 | Emily | |
| 16095 | George | |
| 16096 | Jonathan Broad | |
| 16097 | Jonathan Broad | |
| 16098 | joie de winter | stop heathrow expansion and come 12th to dinner at departures on the 12th january, terminal 1 |
| 16099 | Pavel Beneš | We have the same problem with Prague airport. I can understand your problem! |
| 16100 | Julie White | |