STOP Rougham Airfield Relief Road

Signatures 2216 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 › »

1. 2151
   Name: Michael J G Harris on Dec 4, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2152
   Name: Peter Beer on Dec 4, 2011

   Comments: I object to the building of the proposed road so close to this historical monument. I think due consideration should be given to alternative routes. Peter F Beer

   Flag
3. 2153
   Name: Tom Ratcliffe on Dec 7, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 2154
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 10, 2011

   Comments: It woud be a shame to cut across a lovely war time airfield for everybody to use for many events

   Flag
5. 2155
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 10, 2011

   Comments: It woud be a shame to cut across a lovely war time airfield for everybody to use for many events

   Flag
6. 2156
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 10, 2011

   Comments: It woud be a shame to cut across a lovely war time airfield for everybody to use for many events

   Flag
7. 2157
   Name: Barry Whatley on Dec 14, 2011

   Comments: these morons wo'nt be happy until they've spoilt the entire country.

   Flag
8. 2158
   Name: Jeff Brown on Dec 18, 2011

   Comments: Our aviation heritage is disappearing far too fast !!

   Flag
9. 2159
   Name: R Carpenter on Dec 18, 2011

   Comments: another sign of business over History !

   Flag
10. 2160
    Name: Ken Mc Cole on Dec 18, 2011

    Comments: another blatant disregard by this government to erase the aviation history of this once proud nation

    Flag
11. 2161
    Name: Gary Stedman on Dec 18, 2011

    Comments: A worthy cause and an alternative is clearly available .

    Flag
12. 2162
    Name: Roger Symons on Dec 19, 2011

    Comments: This should not be allowed as it destroys a historically important site

    Flag
13. 2163
    Name: B Long on Dec 29, 2011

    Comments: Building a road here is disrespectful to those that fought for our freedom.

    Flag
14. 2164
    Name: Simon Palmer on Jan 2, 2012

    Comments: The World does not revolve around the Morton Hall Estate, and as such has been already over developed, this Airfield should be left as such to remind people what life was like and to show future generations what life was like in this area.

    Flag
15. 2165
    Name: Victor Snazel on Jan 2, 2012

    Comments: as the airfield buildings are listed surely the rest of the site should be there are very few of these sites left for preservation and to have a airfield like this ruined in this way is nothing short of disrespectful of the history of the airfield and the memory of the service personnel that served there .

    Flag
16. 2166
    Name: Zoe Adams on Jan 3, 2012

    Comments: Why can't the build another road?simple answer?

    Flag
17. 2167
    Name: Michael Stiff on Jan 3, 2012

    Comments: as in my youth i lived and grew up on what was Eldo House farm which in itself was part of the airfield and has now completely dissappeared due to development, it would be a disgrace to see the remaining parts of the airfield overun with new factories and roads, please preserve this area in memory of the heros who's bravery during those dark years give us the freedom we now enjoy !!!!!

    Flag
18. 2168
    Name: Wanda on Jan 8, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 2169
    Name: Dan Mason on Jan 12, 2012

    Comments: if this road is built..it will be a disgrace. shame on all those supporting it.. is nothing sacred from developers in bury

    Flag
20. 2170
    Name: Peter Draper on Jan 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 2171
    Name: Willis Jarrel, Jr. on Jan 16, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 2172
    Name: Robin Bunting on Jan 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 2173
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 19, 2012

    Comments: Please leave the site intact

    Flag
24. 2174
    Name: Tim Axtell on Jan 19, 2012

    Comments: This is a site of historic interest and would be advere=sley affected by this new road.

    Flag
25. 2175
    Name: Mrs. S. Ratcliff on Jan 23, 2012

    Comments: Please don't ruin Rougham Airfield with a road that can easily be routed elsewhere.

    Flag
26. 2176
    Name: Mr. B. Ratcliff on Jan 23, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 2177
    Name: Jimmy Symons on Jan 23, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 2178
    Name: Michael Hampton on Jan 24, 2012

    Comments: I consider that insufficient attention has been given to maintaining the presence of the historic Control Tower and of the Memorial to those who served and gave their lives whilst at Rougham Airfield. clearly there are options which avoid the damage to the locality of the Control Tower and also avoid the runway. Greater weight should be given to protecting these assets.

    Flag
29. 2179
    Name: Barbara Hamaker Gudenius on Jan 28, 2012

    Comments: I support the efforts to preserve this important historical, military site....for all Americans, their ancestors, and the mutual connection (s) with Great Britain during the WWII. Barbara Hamaker Gudenius Baltimore, Maryland USA

    Flag
30. 2180
    Name: Barbara Hamaker Gudenius on Jan 28, 2012

    Comments: I support the efforts to preserve this important historical, military site....for all Americans, their ancestors, and the mutual connection (s) with Great Britain during the WWII. Barbara Hamaker Gudenius Baltimore, Maryland USA

    Flag
31. 2181
    Name: Anne Sharp on Jan 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 2182
    Name: Malcolm Stewart on Jan 30, 2012

    Comments: a wonderful site for Suffolk families and people visiting the area and should be preserved and allowed to continue with its many activities

    Flag
33. 2183
    Name: Mike Cheshire on Feb 14, 2012

    Comments: I know progress has to be made, but you won't realise what you have there until it has gone. For goodness sake let commonsense prevail and find an alternative solution. Why is it essential that the road goes just there?

    Flag
34. 2184
    Name: Graham Stolady on Feb 19, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 2185
    Name: Stephen Lynn on Feb 24, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 2186
    Name: Mrs P Searle on Feb 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 2187
    Name: Rachel Hockley-Warner on Mar 3, 2012

    Comments: Too many of our historic airfields have sucumbed to modern day progress, if we carry on in this manner we will have very little history left! The proposed new road is far to close to the site of the Control Tower at Rougham and so therefore, put's it at risk of vandalism and stress to the building caused by weight of traffic. Please reconsider the new road's position.

    Flag
38. 2188
    Name: Colin Purvis on Mar 15, 2012

    Comments: I find it sad how people forget what was done in the past by so many brave men to give us the freedom we have today.

    Flag
39. 2189
    Name: Kindred Blood on Mar 16, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 2190
    Name: Martyn Coope on Mar 19, 2012

    Comments: As a regular visitor to the various wings and wheels events at your wonderful airfield site I am disgusted that even 1 person in planning could even think of desecrating it.Shame on all who make unilateral and anti-tourist decisions.If the road were to be built and the ambiance spoiled I would not return to spend my money to be surrounded by noisy,smelly trucks etc.

    Flag
41. 2191
    Name: Justin Wheeler on Mar 21, 2012

    Comments: The stupidity of our political 'masters' beggars belief. We are running out of water, power grids cannot cope, yet the march of developers moves onwards. You cannot run an economy based on continual house building and nothing else. Where are the jobs and sustainable industries for the future. Rougham is a gem. As with Duxford, people move into new developments, then complain about 'noisy' aircraft.

    Flag
42. 2192
    Name: Julia Redgrave on Mar 23, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 2193
    Name: Mark Harding on Mar 27, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 2194
    Name: Brian Crysell on Mar 31, 2012

    Comments: The sacrifice of thousands of young Americans, and the memorial to them, who gave lives to preserve our way of life should be a major factor in the decision of the route of this road

    Flag
45. 2195
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 1, 2012

    Comments: rougham airfield is an historic site our family enjoy visiting it throughout the year for various events. Spoiling it in any way would be sacrilege.

    Flag
46. 2196
    Name: SID SMITH on Apr 2, 2012

    Comments: It is not a part of our English Heritage that we should lose

    Flag
47. 2197
    Name: BENSON LANGLEY on Apr 5, 2012

    Comments: The airfield and memorial should be left as it is to preserve the memory of all who served for this country. Why do these so called planners have to be so bloody minded, do they not understand respect and compassion???? Keep up the good fight!!!!!

    Flag
48. 2198
    Name: James Osborne on Apr 6, 2012

    Comments: Please dont make a road thru this historic airfield,it must be preserved

    Flag
49. 2199
    Name: James Osborne on Apr 6, 2012

    Comments: Please do not build this road we dont need it we need to keep histric site

    Flag
50. 2200
    Name: Michael P. Faley on Apr 13, 2012

    Comments: For a Country that prides itself on preserving history, this proposed Road encroaches on that ethic. Seems you could place the road in a different postion.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 › »