STOP Rougham Airfield Relief Road

Signatures 2273 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 46 › »

1. 1
   Name: Tim Hunt on Nov 29, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Richard Dent on Nov 29, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Jon Moret on Nov 29, 2006

   Comments: stop this now ..there is an alternative route which would not effect so amny people.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Ollie on Nov 29, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: George Buckingham on Nov 29, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Harry Allerston on Nov 29, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Paul Thompson on Nov 29, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 29, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Eric Carpenter on Nov 29, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Thomas Beaton on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments: why stop an awesome spot for an amazing sport to be used for polluting the area instead dont understand that.....no need for a road. a bit of green can be nice!! we do see far too many cars about these days for my liking anyway. abismal plan.

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Adam Fosberry on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments: surly the alternative route would be better for the commercial side of things what with that route going through the industrial estate

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Ross Newlands on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Martin Corrie on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments: We must stop this road now. There are alternatives which can avoid messing up the flying and festival area. but the council have NOT taken any notice, why I ask !!! Please add your name to this petition, thanks On behalf of the Suffolk Kite Flyers Martin Chairman Suffolk Kite Flyers Suffolk International Kite Festival organiser

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments: Not been there but would hate to see fellow flyers done out of a good site............may see you one day when up that way visiting relatives..............

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments: @(

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Aston Wilby on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments: :D

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Billy on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: David Wilmer on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Docgreen on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments: perfectly good road already there.........

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Dick Adams on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments: As a serving RAF member, I feel a little more respect for an important military memorial is called for.

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Stewart Ross on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Wayne Harris on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: this would be a assualt on a beautiful bit of land and cannot be allowed to happen

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Paul Denton on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: I disagree with the proposed plan of the connecting road which will divide the airfield, impacting upon the Tower and uers of the airfield for recreational purposes. The alternative southern perimeter track should be used.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Paul Richardson on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: I would much prefer NOT to have the link road built...But if it has to happen please choose the "alternative" option

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Stuart Mcmaster on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: S Wyllie on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Dan Gilkes on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Stewart Linton on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: The airfield gets too much use to build a road through it, we are fast running out of open spaces such as Rougham so to be road would be ridiculous!

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Simon Rogers on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Simon Bailey on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Graham Crabtree on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: As chairman of the Rougham Tower Association.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Simon Thompson on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Phil Derby on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: IF a relief road is required, then at the very least, the alternative route should be used.

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: C J Adams on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: This is an insult to all those commemorated by the newly dedicated war memorial at the Rougham Tower. When they came to Bury St Edmunds to fight and die for our freedom, we were happy to have them supplement our RAF flyers. Let's continue our past record of honouring their sacrifices.

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Anna Corrie on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: PLEASE LOOK THE ALTERNATIVE ROUTES TO AVOID THE AIR FIELD!

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Hugh Prior on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: This is suffolks best open space on a very important historical air field. Please do not destroy!

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Jonathan Hopewell on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: Seems the Suffolk Councils are doing their best to wreck this county, its not just Rougham

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: David Chick on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: The council are there to serve the needs of the taxpayers / voters and listen to their voices not just push through there own pet schemes. Look at all the possibilities and listen to users and locals.

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: James Wapshott on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: David Hepworth on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Mr S Davis on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: Got enough roads round hear ! Try getting planners with common sense !!! Thats wot i say !!! Grid locking Bury with one systems and neadless traffic lights !!!!!

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Lewis Nixon on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: please do not build this! as there is another road that will not effect many people.

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Jo Hunter on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: Please don't cut our airfield in two! Thousands of local people enjoy the site every year, and many more appreciate the quiet ambience of the Control Tower Museum. Large trucks and noisy traffic rolling through the middle of all this would be a crime.

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Keith Jillings on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: PLEASE do not let shortsighted short-term thinking destroy forever a site that is a historic monument to some very brave men who fought for our freedom - or to destroy forever an irreplaceable amenity.

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Stephen Slater on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments: It would indeed be a tragedy if poor planning practice and short-term decision making were to rob us of a superb amenity which is used for relaxation and leisure for so many in the local community. Those who live farther away will also be affected, by the impact on what is a special historic location. If that in turn prevents visitors attending Rougham in the future, it too will have an effect on the local economy. Please think again!!

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: N Kent on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 46 › »