Stop the creation of traveller sites in Barton Le Clay

Signatures 161 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4 › »

1. 101
   Name: Emma Goff on Feb 22, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Gary Eversden on Feb 22, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Erika on Feb 22, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Peter Belcher on Feb 23, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: James Bell on Feb 23, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Julie Bell on Feb 23, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Kieron Beacham on Feb 23, 2013

   Comments: I object to Site 15 and 16 - it is important we preserve our green belt The provision of a travellers site here is still inappropriate development and is not one which meets any of the criteria. The site should be located on brownfield land in an urban area as policy requires and the Green Belt should be protected in line with National Policy. Both sites are set within open countryside and are currently in use as farmland. Site 15 is subject to flooding and not in receipt of utilities and an area of natural beauty - it is very close to A6 as is 15 which would be a noisy environment for the travelling community children

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 24, 2013

   Comments: I fully object to the proposed plans based on the over development of barton le Clay which should remain as a small village and community

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 25, 2013

   Comments: I fail to understand why preferential treatment is given to this group, surely either your a traveller or you are not and if your not then you should integrate into the rest of society like everybody else has to. I wholly disagree on many levels with regard to the proposals, but I am unable to express my very valid opinion because Beds CC will ignore anything other than on grounds of planning.

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Nicola Kane on Feb 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Steven Eade on Feb 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Laura Eade on Feb 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Tony S on Feb 25, 2013

    Comments: AONB has to be preserved as the landscape whose distinctive character and natural beauty are so outstanding that it is in the nations interest to safeguard it. The site of a site is obviously against that interest.

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Mandy Jack on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Michelle on Feb 26, 2013

    Comments: No

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Laura Williamson on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Dale Witheridge on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Dale Witheridge on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Yvonne Cole on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments: I have alrelady sent my objections via email to CBC.

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 28, 2013

    Comments: We already have one illegal site near the Speed the Plough. Let another village have one.

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Mark Smith on Mar 1, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 1, 2013

    Comments: This is a disgrace and should not be allowed to proceed any further. Why two sites in Barton?? We already have one near the Grove pub. What about the impact on Barton, drop in house prices? Well done Central Beds....lets destroy another beautiful village and the surrounding ones such as Sharpenhoe and Streatley in the process!

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Graeme Smith on Mar 1, 2013

    Comments: This is a ludicrous idea and must be stopped now. Aside from the fact its within green belt land and will be a massive blot on a beautiful landscape.We in Barton do not have the infrastructure to cope a massive influx of travellers.

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Mr Mrs Martin Smith on Mar 1, 2013

    Comments: if they are travellers why dont they travel?

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 1, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Christine Rust on Mar 1, 2013

    Comments: I am totally against any plans for travellers site within the Barton area. Green belt land should be protected!

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Margaret Dolan on Mar 2, 2013

    Comments: Vehemently Oppose Gypsy & Traveller Sites that are planned for Barton le Clay

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Shaun Fitzgerald on Mar 2, 2013

    Comments: Why does this country aways favour minorities ? Whats to stop us all buying an old caravan each and putting it on the sites ?

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 2, 2013

    Comments: Vehemently Oppose Gypsy & Traveller Sites that are planned for Barton le Clay

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Miss Verna Bailey on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments: my house backs onto the A6 opposite where all this could happen, why wasnt my neighbours and myself made aware of this at the beginning .disgusting why to run a council. i thought greenbelt was meant to be safe, money talks quite clearly.

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Elaine O'Sullivan on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments: Preserve our green spaces!

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Veronica Painter on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Brendan OSullivan on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments: Please don't spoil our beautiful countryside.

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Buy Discount Viagra Online on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments: oiGFDQ I value the article post.Much thanks again. Will read on...

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 7, 2013

    Comments: Would someone please explain to me why, if these people are called travellers, do they need permanent sites. We do not want our village, green belt and wild life destroyed by these sites and its about time that Central Beds listened to its residents

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Dean Elcome on Mar 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Gemma Elcome on Mar 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Lisa Simpson on Mar 9, 2013

    Comments: this is not acceptable for our village and will destroy it ...

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Mathew Brazier on Mar 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Lesley & Joe McCaffrey on Mar 12, 2013

    Comments: If Nadine Dorries cares anything at all about her consitutency she will not let this happen. We live in Silsoe which is being ruined by an ugly housing estate which has had no forethought and the houses are not even selling. Our property prices have fallen and crime, which was never heard of in our village, has increased. Please please do not let this go ahead - property prices, jobs, businesses in Barton, Silsoe, Pulloxhill, Higham Gobian and all surrounding villages will suffer greatly

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Bookmaring Service on Mar 15, 2013

    Comments: Y8sk52 I cannot thank you enough for the blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Caroline Hoyle on Mar 16, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Stephen Ray on Mar 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Mr Tim Savage on Mar 18, 2013

    Comments: Against gypsy site off Faldo road due to green belt land and dangerous road a6

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Nikki Desborough on Mar 20, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Chris Wilkinson on Mar 24, 2013

    Comments: Local authorities may be bound to provide housing for homeless people, but not second and in some cases even third homes for Irish Travellers. Using taxpayers' money to provide extra accommodation and facilities for a wealthy group of people who already have homes, (mainly in Ireland) constitutes a gross misuse of public funds.

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Mary Holloway on Mar 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Claire Trumpeter on Mar 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Sarah on Mar 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4 › »