Stop development of Traveller site in Grappenhall Green Belt

Signatures 635 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 13 › »

1. 151
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments: We do not need any more travellers moving into our small village community.

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Gerard Moulding on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Lesley Sweetman on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Bob Wallace on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments: This current planning application bears no relationship to the original stated intention for the site, for which there was agreement. They simply wish to expand and expand the site, and in fact have done so, taking no notice of the neighbouring community's feelings. It would also seem they pay scant attention to planning regulations

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Jayne Cheek on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments: This will start small and increase to a full community if plans go ahead, please see sense.People pay alot of money and work really hard to live in the area and do not need travellers and all that goes with them to deal with.

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Gary on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments: No to gypo's, They'll have their own town their before we know it!!

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Shelley Ankers-Wainwright on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Jim Speers on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Dave Nightingale on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: Travellers should travel !!!!

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Mrs Powell on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: This needs to be stopped 4 - 12 caravans this will not stop at 12 they will arrive in there droves sorry but no enough if every member of WBC lived in Grappenhall it would not even be considered . I had a meal in the Thorne Inn and had a full table of very loud and noisy Travellers will not be going again in a hurry.

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Mr J Davison on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Irene Taylor on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: No to expansion of travelers site at Cartridge Lane/Broad Lane

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Nicole Cairns on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Kate Swindell on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Andrew Cunningham on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Alan Cairns on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Greg Boden on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: John Williams. on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Joy Williams on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Karen Hey on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: I strongly oppose this site.

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Kristina Seed on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Jamie Miller on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: This is not an appropriate development in green belt. There are ample other sites in the area.

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Mark Wadsworth on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: WBC should stop worrying about being "PC" and should represent the local majority of tax and council tax payers

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Jim Jefferies on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: I object strongly to the extension on ths green belt land.

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Vera Jefferies on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: I strongly object to the above plans.

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Jane Cartwright on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Mrs J L Priestley on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: We as a family were against the application originally and strongly object to any permission being granted. The land is green belt!

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Claire Gannon on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Claire Gannon on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: I wonder how many back handers are being dealt within WBC???

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Mr John Neale on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: I strongly object to this proposal and as a local resident I am concerned as at the 15th January this is the first I have heard of the submitted application to WBC. It appears WBC have kept local residents in the dark although they have a duty to serve a public notice.

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Mrs Lynn Neale on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: I object to this planning application in the Green Belt and would like WBC to answer why as a local resident I have not been informed sooner of this proposal. Warrington Borough Council are completely in the wrong to suggest local residents are not that concerned as a result of a poor attendance at a recent sitting. The poor attendance is due to WBC failing to inform the local community.

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Susan Griffiths on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Thomas Wilson on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Kerry Moston on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Glen Boden on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 13 › »