Stop development of Traveller site in Grappenhall Green Belt

Signatures 635 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 13 › »

1. 101
   Name: Mark Roberts on Jan 14, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: R.P.Woolley on Jan 14, 2013

   Comments: In the last 3 months there have been more than the accepted 2 families on this site. I feel that 12 could become 24 in the not too distant future.

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Joanne Devlin on Jan 14, 2013

   Comments: I totally appose the application

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Paul Frankland on Jan 14, 2013

   Comments: blatent disregard of guidelines set up to protect greenbelt land.

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Donna Romani on Jan 14, 2013

   Comments: I oppose the development of the tracvellers site on Cartridge Lane.It is unfair and would be dangerous to have so many people coming and going on that site. Also unfair that we have to abide by the planning laws for our own developments/extentions, and pay for the privelidge if living here in our council tax.

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Dr Simon Romani on Jan 14, 2013

   Comments: I oppose the planning application to further develop and add more travellers dwellings to the site on cartridge Lane.

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Rhonda Eccleston on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Peter Eccleston on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: A Short on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Richard Barbera on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Pete Wellock on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments: Sirs, I wish to express my concern and objection to the proposed retrospective planning application on Cartridge Lane. This has been an ongoing issue for some time and despite some changes the applicant continues to flout the regulations. They were initially given a temporary stay but on conditions. One was not cutting down trees, which they then did. I am not anti traveller but feel they should be treated fairly and respect the planning laws as the rest of us have to. There are many examples of residents who have tried to get retrospective planning through, even some extreme where councils have had to demolish property. Quite simply this is designated green belt, if we could not build houses there then we should not allow this application to go through, one rule for all consistently applied.

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Andy Henshall on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments: Green belts should be kept as they are for all the local community to enjoy not for travellers to settle down on.

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Mrs Susan Barton on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments: This should not be allowed to happen development of green belt areas out of the question.

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Mike Frankland on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments: Total disregard of planning laws should of had been moved on after ignoring the renewal date for the temporary agreement

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Liz on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Les Gregory on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments: Comments: I wish to express my objection to the proposed retrospective planning application on Cartridge Lane. This has been an ongoing issue for some time and despite some changes the applicant continues to flout the regulations.

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Susan Brinksman on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: Why should they not pay rates like aeveryone else? Not fair to the rest of the community.

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Aide Wood on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: This site is on green belt land and far from adequate for this number of residents. Planning permission should be denied and the current residents evicted immediately.

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Jeffrey Hall on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: Warrington council should do what they are paid to do and act in the interests of the community ahd provide a suitable brown site location for the traveller community and with suitabkle facilities for thier families. Green belt Warringtojn is very im important to the whole Warrington community.

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Rita Hall on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: Warrington council should do what they are paid to do and act in the interests of the community ahd provide a suitable brown site location for the traveller community and with suitabkle facilities for thier families. Green belt Warringtojn is very im important to the whole Warrington community.

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: The majority of local residents have not been given the opportunity to object to this retrospective planning application due to a failure by Warrington Borough Council to give adequate notification. The land at the junction of Cartridge Lane / Broad Road is Green Belt and should not be developed; there are numerous brown sites in Warrington that could be utilised.

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Chris Rustage on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Warren Strobridge on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Jane Rustage on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: Planning application to extend travellers site on green belt land is ludicrous and should not have been allowed to get this far,WBC should be ashamed of them selves to even consider this,they have overstayed their welcome time to move on

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Helen Roberts on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: green belt areas should not be developed in this way

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Andrew East on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: I have already nearly had 2 accidents near this site from un-controlled dogs running into the road from within the site - further epansion is a blatant attempt to bypass planning regs and will further degenerate the area as it is an eyesore to anyone who passes by it.

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: My obvious concern is affect on my house price, and impact on the surrounding area!!!!

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Enrichetta Mason on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: I object to the proposed application to to Warrington Borough Council to extend the traveller site at Grappenhall, Cartridge Lane Warrington. The original agreement was on a temporary basis for the site to remain there. The agreement has since expired and rather than honour the agreement, there is a proposal to extend the site. The council need to ensure consistency in applying planning laws in respect of green belt areas and not approve the application. Further the temporray status needs to be looked at with aview to ensuring the land is reverted back to its original usuage and not let the land be developed

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Margaret Webster on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Mr Colin Webster on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: We do not need any more travellers moving into our small village community.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 13 › »