Signatures 645 total
-
1
Name: Anonymous on Jan 10, 2013Comments: This is clearly an attempt to bully WBC into agreeing to develop in Green Belt which the Government have already decreed to be unacceptable. Must be denied!Flag
-
2
Name: Mark Trimble on Jan 10, 2013Comments: This is clearly an attempt to bully WBC into agreeing to develop in Green Belt which the Government have already decreed to be unacceptable. Must be denied!Flag
-
3
Name: Mary Ward on Jan 11, 2013Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Christopher Ward on Jan 11, 2013Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Anita Whittle on Jan 11, 2013Comments: This is inappropriate development of green belt land.Flag
-
6
Name: Anonymous on Jan 11, 2013Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Richard Buttrey on Jan 12, 2013Comments: I have submitted a separate written objection to WBC.Flag
-
8
Name: Zoe Tilston on Jan 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Steven Tilston on Jan 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Jim Walker on Jan 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Patricia Walker on Jan 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Anonymous on Jan 13, 2013Comments: As a Grappenhall resident I strongly object to the planning application to extend the traveller site at the junction of cartridge lane / broad lane.Flag
-
13
Name: Chris Hall on Jan 13, 2013Comments: We are against any building on our green belt areas. Especially as Warrington has so many unused brown sites.Flag
-
14
Name: Andrea Hall on Jan 13, 2013Comments: We are against any building on our green belt areas. Especially as Warrington has so many unused brown sites.Flag
-
15
Name: Claudia Hall on Jan 13, 2013Comments: We are against any building on our green belt areas. Especially as Warrington has so many unused brown sites.Flag
-
16
Name: Anonymous on Jan 13, 2013Comments: There is no need for this extension on green belt, there are plenty of Brown Field sites in Warrington to place this site.Flag
-
17
Name: Christian Hall on Jan 13, 2013Comments: We are against any building on our green belt areas. Especially as Warrington has so many unused brown sites.Flag
-
18
Name: LWM Staddon on Jan 13, 2013Comments: We are against any building on our green belt areas. Especially as Warrington has so many unused brown sites.Flag
-
19
Name: Mary Staddon on Jan 13, 2013Comments: We are against any building on our green belt areas. Especially as Warrington has so many unused brown sites.Flag
-
20
Name: Irene Carter on Jan 13, 2013Comments: We are against any building on our green belt areas. Especially as Warrington has so many unused brown sites.Flag
-
21
Name: Melly O'Grady on Jan 13, 2013Comments: We are against any building on our green belt areas. Especially as Warrington has so many unused brown sites.Flag
-
22
Name: Sean Cusack on Jan 13, 2013Comments: We are against any building on our green belt areas. Especially as Warrington has so many unused brown sites.Flag
-
23
Name: Mike Thom on Jan 13, 2013Comments: We are against any building on our green belt areas. Especially as Warrington has so many unused brown sites.Flag
-
24
Name: Anonymous on Jan 13, 2013Comments: We strongly object to the possibly of travellers be given planning permission on green belt land at cartridge lane / board laneFlag
-
25
Name: Anonymous on Jan 13, 2013Comments: We strongly object to the possibly of travellers be given planning permission on green belt land at cartridge lane / board laneFlag
-
26
Name: Irene Carter on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I do not agree to building on our green areaFlag
-
27
Name: Irene Carter on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I do not agree to building on our green areaFlag
-
28
Name: Shirley And Phillip Cann on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Diane Heaton on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I do not agree to building on our green areaFlag
-
30
Name: Michelle Robinson on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I do not agree with building on green areasFlag
-
31
Name: Eric Conor on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I do not agree to building on green areasFlag
-
32
Name: Daniel Robinson on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I do not agree to building on green areasFlag
-
33
Name: Anthony Carter on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I do not agree to building on green areasFlag
-
34
Name: Anthony Carter on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I do not agree to building on green areasFlag
-
35
Name: Elaine Dyson on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I do not agree to building on green areasFlag
-
36
Name: M Dyson on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I do not agree to building on green areasFlag
-
37
Name: Jan Bracegirdle on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I do not agree to building on green areasFlag
-
38
Name: Anthony Hall on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I do not agree to building on green areasFlag
-
39
Name: Patricia Ward on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I do not agree to building on green areasFlag
-
40
Name: Catherine Hurst on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Anonymous on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Anonymous on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Anonymous on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: John Boardman on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Annette Boardman on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Mike Biggin on Jan 13, 2013Comments: Not against Travellers but solidly against inappropriate expansion in Green Belt. Unfair to everyone who abides by the rulesFlag
-
47
Name: Jackie Woolley on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Anonymous on Jan 13, 2013Comments: Green belt needs to be kept as green belt.Flag
-
49
Name: Anonymous on Jan 13, 2013Comments: Green belt needs to be kept as green belt.Flag
-
50
Name: Anonymous on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I wish to express my concern at the Planning application to extent the travellers site in Grappenhall.Flag