Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 74 total

Page: 1, 2

  1. 1
    Name: Valerie Farnell on Dec 17, 2009
    Comments: i support the petition
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Richard Rees on Dec 17, 2009
    Comments: The Council must abide by the details of the original planning application and not allow the school to inappropriately disturb the quiet and nature of the conservation area by stealth.
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Stuart Barr on Dec 17, 2009
    Comments: It seems utterly bonkers to use a residential road as the access point to the school's sports facilities out of hours, when the main entrance on Clapham Road is much closer to public transport and is on a main road.
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Re Bethe on Dec 17, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Janis Burton on Dec 17, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: JO Craig on Dec 17, 2009
    Comments: I whole heartedly support the petition
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Patricia Tomlinson on Dec 17, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Isabelle Bethe on Dec 17, 2009
    Comments: Opening the gates for evening access would be very disruptive to the neighbourhood, and I feel safety and security would be an issue.
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Teddie Pattinson on Dec 17, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Andrew Brookes on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Paula Steele on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Ian Hunt on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Adrian Jonson on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Petrina Good on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Elaine Knight on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments: More consideration should be given to the impact felt by the residents of the local area when the school's new sports facilities are open. Surely the best way to do this would be to direct the vast majority of all traffic away from the residential roads. We have, several times, had children in school uniform simply walking into our garden via the back gate so we know there is little respect for other people's property.
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Steven Lowe on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: George Clarke on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments: There could not be a less appropriate plae for an entrance like this.
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Maria MacGregor on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Matthew Hall on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Lawrence Joseph Cook on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: James And Emma Garvin on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments: Our garden adjoins the school and we worry very much about security. We have a family with three children and the safety of our garden and rear of our house are very important to us. Please reconsider this decision.
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Vivien Cross on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: John Cross on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Andrew G. Park on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Joanna Harrison on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Saeed Mohamedali on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Alex Gibson-Watt on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Leopold Deliss on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Marion Manning on Dec 18, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Scott Hayward on Dec 19, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Scott Hayward on Dec 19, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Matthew Cavalier on Dec 20, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Martin Franklin on Dec 20, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Ros Ramsay on Dec 21, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Brett Moore on Dec 21, 2009
    Comments: If we allow access from Stockwell Park Road to the Sports Facility - what's to stop the school requesting access for the school children in the future ?
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Peter Moore on Dec 21, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 21, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 21, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Adam Greaves on Dec 21, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Chistian Palfrey on Jan 15, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Vicki Wallis on Jan 15, 2010
    Comments: I fully support the above petition
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Crispin Kenyon on Jan 23, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Crispin Kenyon on Jan 23, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Dr Dino Birkenstock on Jan 23, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Brian Moxey on Jan 24, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: J Seidler on Jan 24, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Alyson Holder on Jan 25, 2010
    Comments: The residents carpark for my house in Regency Mews backs on to the school. We already have a constant stream of pupils who climb over the fence into our private car park. On numerous occasions they have been seen trying to climb over the fence into my garden. The risk to my property will be made worse by the erection of the proposed permanent fence. In addition, the parking is already intolerable in Stockwell Park Road and will only be made worse for residents by this proposal. I strongly object.
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Damola on Jan 25, 2010
    Comments: I support/agree with the above statements.
    Flag

Page: 1, 2

Sponsored links