Signatures 3521 total
-
1
Name: Ryan Thomas on Nov 12, 2007Comments: To hell with banning this - far too few establishments are brave enough to do this. The council should encourage these people rather than have a go at them!Flag
-
2
Name: Anonymous on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Nick Smith on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Dan McDonald on Nov 13, 2007Comments: Save the newport nude!Flag
-
5
Name: Anonymous on Nov 13, 2007Comments: Love the windows, hate sponsorship!Flag
-
6
Name: Jools Constant on Nov 13, 2007Comments: Grow up Newport!Flag
-
7
Name: Lauren Cowdery on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Dominic Williams on Nov 13, 2007Comments: Michelangelos statue of David...Flag
-
9
Name: Kate on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Anonymous on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Rhys Sharrem on Nov 13, 2007Comments: It is stupid to censor this. I have been to the shop and while I was there, several people walked past and laughed, clearly enjoying a bit of fun, while not one person walked past and were offended. These people's talent should be encouraged not hidden away and smothered!Flag
-
12
Name: Wes White on Nov 13, 2007Comments: The very idea of banning it is ridiculous. The artwork is fantastic, it could be offensive only to people who were looking to be offended. The artwork should be celebrated.Flag
-
13
Name: Jon Rowley on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Emily on Nov 13, 2007Comments: i think its outrageous and ignorant of people to take offence to such an obviously well considered and inspired piece of art work. i hope kate has taken offence to this she's extremely talentedFlag
-
15
Name: Romaine Moulton on Nov 13, 2007Comments: I thought the man was quite amusing!!Flag
-
16
Name: Josie Beszant on Nov 13, 2007Comments: go girls! this isn't porn it's art and good art too.Flag
-
17
Name: Rhiannon Jenkins on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Dominic Smith on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Jakee on Nov 13, 2007Comments: this quirky, playful and absract piece of work should not be censored. you can see far worse things when you view modern art in a gallery.....Flag
-
20
Name: Sarah Cockett on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Iwan Hancock on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Carys Angharad Twist on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Anonymous on Nov 13, 2007Comments: Does this mean garden cherubs and michelagelos david should also be censored perhaps newports police should be more interested in censoring the frequent flashing from male members of the public on a saturday night rather than censoring a piece of art workFlag
-
24
Name: Graham Sellwood on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Russell Britton on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: George Galbraith on Nov 13, 2007Comments: That a representation of part of the male anatomy (the part which ensures the continuance of the race)should be considered obscene I find grossly offensive. But then perhaps there are people in the world with nasty dirty little minds!Flag
-
27
Name: David Lupton on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Zillah Engerran on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Joshua Rogers-Evans on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Traci on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Emma Tinker on Nov 13, 2007Comments: Frankly disappointed at apparent lack of male genitalia in photo. Am appalled at the threat of censorship: best of luck in resisting this ridiculous demand.Flag
-
32
Name: Violet Fenn on Nov 13, 2007Comments: Whatever happened to freedom of expression...Flag
-
33
Name: Rhian Barrell on Nov 13, 2007Comments: Such a sad shame that this has happened. Kate Montgomery was featured in the local newspaper not long ago, did the authorities take action thenFlag
-
34
Name: Andrew Cargill on Nov 13, 2007Comments: starling vendetta rocks!!Flag
-
35
Name: Mike Moulton on Nov 13, 2007Comments: What is the problem with it - it funny!!Flag
-
36
Name: Eleanor Jane Parsons on Nov 13, 2007Comments: Perhaps the problem lies in the sad fact that Kate Montgomery's nakey little chappy is the only thing in Newport with any real balls... I for one can't wait to see the responses on the letters page of the Argus!Flag
-
37
Name: Anonymous on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Patrick Graham on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Andrew Jones on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Oliver Gryce on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
41
Name: Helen O'Riain on Nov 13, 2007Comments: This censorship is ridiculous. What kind of a society are we living in We'll be having authorities telling us which end of the egg to eat first soon...Flag
-
42
Name: Anonymous on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Sian Bell on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Claire James on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Owen Llewellyn on Nov 13, 2007Comments: This is another case of people criticising something they dont understand, having nearly being stabbed a couple of months ago along with a few friends in Newport, this is the LEAST the council and police have to worry about. (Having nothing come of the reporting of the man with the knife, I know now where the police dedicate their time.)Flag
-
46
Name: C.James Fagan on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Adriana Moreira Vazquez on Nov 13, 2007Comments: that is just discrimination towards genuinely amazing art, local art more importantly! Way out of order!Flag
-
48
Name: Adriana Moreira Vazquez on Nov 13, 2007Comments: that is just discrimination towards genuinely amazing art, local art more importantly! Way out of order!Flag
-
49
Name: Tim Hawkins on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Kyra Bown on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag