Petition against development of Staples site

Signatures 181 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4

1. 151
   Name: Kim Brinnen on Mar 1, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Kim Brinnen on Mar 1, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Sylvia Dannreuther on Mar 1, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Richard Pollard on Mar 1, 2013

   Comments: The proposed development needs to include improvements to the local environment, mainly the excessive traffic circulation.

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Tamsin Wimhurst on Mar 1, 2013

   Comments: This is not in keeping with the area and will not improve what is a community center of cambridge.

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: D Elliston on Mar 1, 2013

   Comments: The present structure is ugly why replace it with something bigger that is still ugly

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Julie Williams on Mar 1, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Sue Rogers on Mar 1, 2013

   Comments: I am a local resident and agree completely with the above statement

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Roger Giddings on Mar 1, 2013

   Comments: Random design that could be anywhere. This is a roundabout with houses/flats in - why not make it something positive rather than the usual lowest common denominator to make money for an owner and never mind the people that live there.

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Sue Osmaston on Mar 1, 2013

    Comments: Please consider the character of the riverside and Victorian conservation area, the safety of cyclists, and the needs of local retailers and residents over the wishes of developers, so that yet another area of this beautiful city does not succumb to high rise monstrosities.

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Charlene Rohr on Mar 2, 2013

    Comments: It is time that this space is redeveloped to make it a more attractive space for local stakeholders. A first priority is to sort out the traffic layout.

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Stephanie James Roach on Mar 2, 2013

    Comments: Though I agree with progress and improvement of this site I do not feel the proposed development enhances the area or its users. Particularly dangerous for the International students using bicycles on such a busy congested road!

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Claire Ward on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments: I think this is a quick cheap solution which retains the island. I understand that there is an alternative somewhere that gets rid of the island and sorts out the AWFUL traffic system (especially for cyclists)

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Nienke De Maat on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments: This development is a major missed opportunity for Chesterton and Cambridge proper. Mitcham's Corner, if it is to be redeveloped, needs an imaginative community-centred scheme that befits such a crossroads.

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Buy Discount Viagra on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments: 6Dg5VD Major thankies for the blog post.Really thank you! Awesome.

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Buy Viagra Online on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments: AG91iX Awesome blog.Really thank you! Fantastic.

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Http://1buyviagrahere.com/ on Mar 3, 2013

    Comments: CqL0TJ Im obliged for the blog post.

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 5, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Verity Cole on Mar 5, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 5, 2013

    Comments: The site does need re-development bu thise does not look attractive

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Simon Cross on Mar 5, 2013

    Comments: There is too much unsympathetic tower block development in Cambridge at the moment. It is the wrong thing for this site.

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Lorraine Cockerton on Mar 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Sam Skeaping on Mar 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Juliet Snell on Mar 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 8, 2013

    Comments: There is an opportunity here to create something beautiful, sympathetic and life-enhancing in the long term for the people who live in this area - and it is primarily a residential area. Please let's not opt instead for fat profits for developers and another cheap cruddy building that will look awful from day one but really hideous in about 5 years.

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Social Bookmarks on Mar 14, 2013

    Comments: 8N91Gl Enjoyed every bit of your blog post.Really thank you! Awesome.

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Bookmarks on Mar 14, 2013

    Comments: l2mtMv I am so grateful for your post.Much thanks again. Really Great.

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Social Bookmarks on Mar 14, 2013

    Comments: xydN9j Thanks a lot for the blog article.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Bookmarks on Mar 15, 2013

    Comments: 7Zahgb Really enjoyed this blog article.Thanks Again.

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Social Bookmarks on Mar 15, 2013

    Comments: qnTi3t Im grateful for the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Want more.

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: John King on Mar 23, 2013

    Comments: Any redevelopment of this area should have, as a priority, making the junction more pedestrian- and cycle friendly. The current high-speed gyratory should go.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4