Signatures 184 total
-
51
Name: Emma Bryceson on Feb 20, 2013Comments: The developers introduced their plans for the proposed development of Mitcham's Corner both as a "Celebration and as Regeneration of Mitcham's Corner". In fact it offers absolutely no improvement to the area and there is so very much opportunity that it seems they are going to completely ignore it. A building of this height and mass dominating the CONSERVATION area would not enhance let alone compliment the surrounding buildings (which is required by any new development to a conservation area). The architect of the development clearly has no imagination whatsoever. The proposed building would be totally overbearing and unacceptable. Allowing it to proceed in its current form would be desastrous.Flag
-
52
Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2013Comments: I strongly endorse the comments made by the Friends of Mitcham's Corner.Flag
-
53
Name: Simon Stoddart on Feb 20, 2013Comments:Flag
-
54
Name: Phil Lee on Feb 20, 2013Comments:Flag
-
55
Name: Tom Corder on Feb 21, 2013Comments:Flag
-
56
Name: Tom Gaskell on Feb 21, 2013Comments:Flag
-
57
Name: +Simon Barrington-Ward & Dr Jean Barrington-Ward on Feb 21, 2013Comments: Wnat to support this all i CANFlag
-
58
Name: Rt Rev Simon Barrington-Ward & Dr Jean B-W on Feb 21, 2013Comments: This a terrible plan creating an overlarge and hideous structure which undermines and threatens other users of this area..We live near and know this.Flag
-
59
Name: +Simon And Jean Barrington-Ward on Feb 21, 2013Comments: Appalled byt the size and ugliness of the proposed structure and the effects on others using that area.. Its all a terrible mistake . we join the many against it and amy we prevail!Flag
-
60
Name: Paul Barrett on Feb 22, 2013Comments:Flag
-
61
Name: Emma Bryceson on Feb 22, 2013Comments: Allowing a building of this height and mass which would dominate Mitcham's Corner, a CONSERVATION AREA, would ruin an important gateway into Cambridge from the North. It would be a disaster.Flag
-
62
Name: Linus Forsberg on Feb 22, 2013Comments: The proposed scale and height is not appropriate for the location. The planners should work to come up with a strategy for this area as a whole before allowing piece by piece isolated developments to go ahead. There are a number of issues with Mitcham's Corner that needs to be resolved to improve the area. The proposed development does not address any of these issues.Flag
-
63
Name: Peter Brunning on Feb 23, 2013Comments: Surely this is an opportunity to give Mitcham's 'Trauma' - a 60s (?) example of urban racetrack - a more pedestrian and cycle friendly layout, with a much more pleasant appearance for residents?Flag
-
64
Name: Anonymous on Feb 24, 2013Comments: I strongly endorse the comments of the Friends of Mitcham's CornerFlag
-
65
Name: Philip Bradley on Feb 24, 2013Comments: Planned building is too high, too massive and too ugly. Any building on this site must complement the surrounding buildings.Flag
-
66
Name: Roisin McManus on Feb 25, 2013Comments:Flag
-
67
Name: Max Dunlop on Feb 25, 2013Comments:Flag
-
68
Name: Mike Sargeant on Feb 25, 2013Comments:Flag
-
69
Name: Virginie Lourgant on Feb 25, 2013Comments: This planning project is completely unsuitable for the area.Flag
-
70
Name: Barbara Acworth on Feb 25, 2013Comments: Plans are totally unsuitable for the area. Contradicts all to do with the meaning of "conservation area", the proposed development is too high, to massive and extremely ugly. The planners need to rethink this one from scratch. Try again and try to get it right.Flag
-
71
Name: Gill Gledhill on Feb 25, 2013Comments: Too high, too massive and beyond uglinessFlag
-
72
Name: Jenny Edwards on Feb 25, 2013Comments: I strongly endorse the comments of the Friends of Mitcham's CornerFlag
-
73
Name: Kieran Morgan on Feb 25, 2013Comments:Flag
-
74
Name: Patrizza Bayliss Smith on Feb 25, 2013Comments: I endorse comments of the Friends of Mitcham's CornerFlag
-
75
Name: Anonymous on Feb 25, 2013Comments:Flag
-
76
Name: Chandru Mullaparthi on Feb 25, 2013Comments: I endorse the comments of the Friends of Mitcham's CornerFlag
-
77
Name: Chris Maloney on Feb 25, 2013Comments: I endorse the comments of the Friends of Mitcham's CornerFlag
-
78
Name: Bridget Hannigan on Feb 25, 2013Comments: I strongly object to these plans on the basis of their height, mass and ugliness. Totally unsuitable for this area.Flag
-
79
Name: Brnaka Hayley on Feb 25, 2013Comments: I endorse the above commentsFlag
-
80
Name: Sue Dodson on Feb 26, 2013Comments: I strongly endorse the above commentsFlag
-
81
Name: Ben Inman on Feb 26, 2013Comments: I strongly endorse the above commentsFlag
-
82
Name: Anonymous on Feb 26, 2013Comments: I strongly endorse the above commentsFlag
-
83
Name: Emily Bryceson on Feb 26, 2013Comments: I strongly endorse the above commentsFlag
-
84
Name: Nick Maloney on Feb 26, 2013Comments: I strongly endorse the above commentsFlag
-
85
Name: Rhys Baldwin on Feb 26, 2013Comments: Having wealthy students who won't be contributing to the area is not the answer to the problem.Flag
-
86
Name: Emma Bryceson on Feb 26, 2013Comments: This is entirely the wrong type of development for this area. Mitcham's Corner is totally inappropriate for such student accommodation and the only shops that would be used in this area are the existing ones. Planners must reconsider a suitable development taking all aspects into account and KEEP THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO A SENSIBLE SCALE.Flag
-
87
Name: Sue Dodson on Feb 26, 2013Comments: I totally support the objections of the Friends of Mitcham's Corner regarding this proposed developmentFlag
-
88
Name: Vorn Hancock on Feb 26, 2013Comments:Flag
-
89
Name: Victoria Jones on Feb 26, 2013Comments:Flag
-
90
Name: Brenda Jones-Woods on Feb 26, 2013Comments:Flag
-
91
Name: David Read on Feb 26, 2013Comments: I totally endorse the above commentsFlag
-
92
Name: Patricia Read on Feb 26, 2013Comments: I strongly endorse the above commentsFlag
-
93
Name: Anonymous on Feb 26, 2013Comments: I totally endorse the above commentsFlag
-
94
Name: Anonymous on Feb 26, 2013Comments: I strongly endorse the above commentsFlag
-
95
Name: Anonymous on Feb 26, 2013Comments: I strongly endorse the above commentsFlag
-
96
Name: Tim Philbin on Feb 26, 2013Comments: I totally agree with the objections of the Friends of Mitcham's CornerFlag
-
97
Name: Bettina Furnee on Feb 26, 2013Comments:Flag
-
98
Name: Kathy Rees on Feb 26, 2013Comments: I object to this plan on the grounds of the height of the proposed building.Flag
-
99
Name: David Rees on Feb 26, 2013Comments:Flag
-
100
Name: Eric Marland on Feb 26, 2013Comments: I fear the proposed development will increase the amount of traffic in an already busy intersection whilst reducing the number of parking spaces available. These factors combined with the poor cycling skills of most foreign students will certainly add to the risk of accidents.Flag