Signatures 74 total
Page: 1, 2
- 1
-
2
Name: Rachel Zeng on Mar 22, 2008Comments: I don't see why we must pay extra to enjoy something that was part of the tv license.Flag
- 3
- 4
-
5
Name: Patrick Tan on Mar 22, 2008Comments: I'll be terminating my sportschannel. Just relised that who ever wins in the match have got nothing to do with me.Flag
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
9
Name: Gerald Giam on Mar 23, 2008Comments: All major sporting events like tennis grand slams, Olympics, World Cup matches should be shown on free-to-air TV instead of cable.Flag
-
10
Name: Donald on Mar 23, 2008Comments: i am paying about SGD$60 for my starhub digital cable subscription and more than 40% of the monthly subscription was for the sports related groups/channels..and now singtel won the rights to UEFA Champions League, what is going on this is crazy!Flag
- 11
-
12
Name: Mah Cheng Wai Derrick on Mar 24, 2008Comments: I love Singapore. But Singapore doesn't love meFlag
- 13
- 14
-
15
Name: Freddy on Mar 24, 2008Comments: This attempt by singnet to take revenge against starhub for securing exclusive rights to broadcast the EPL is the ultimate in lame. Enough with this bulls**t! I will never subscribe to miotv!Flag
-
16
Name: Better Is The Only Option on Mar 24, 2008Comments: Same shit, different time! We've been suckered again! Just who profit from all these wayangsFlag
- 17
- 18
- 19
-
20
Name: Anonymous on Mar 24, 2008Comments: In order to have customers, I believe starhub should have a lower cost price so that we will be MORE loyal.Flag
-
21
Name: Aidil Omar on Mar 25, 2008Comments: No MioTV for me. It is quite simple. Their programs are rubbish and mediocre. Now that they have rights to to Euro 2008, perhaps I will tune in to RCTI (Indonesia). Bottomline is, you can shove it where the sun don't shine, MioTV. I am not subscribing to you.Flag
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
-
26
Name: Anonymous on Mar 25, 2008Comments: Singaporeans are being exploited. This has to stop. It's really filling up both pockets of the govtFlag
- 27
- 28
-
29
Name: Ng Swee Kang on Mar 25, 2008Comments: I think we are already overpaying for Starhub considering the overall drop in quality of football shown on TV. It simply is weird to have pre- and post-match programs without the footage. With the early morning matches like the Champions' League, there is nowhere better to watch them than in the comfort of your own home. Given the lack in viable alternatives, having to subscribe to a whole new service just to be able to enjoy something which Starhub should have been providing is not fair in my view.Flag
- 30
-
31
Name: Lim Jun Jie on Mar 25, 2008Comments: It was promised that greater competition would be good for consumers, in terms of better choices, quality and prices. Now, we just have less choices, lousy live transmission and prices inflating 300% in 5 years.Flag
-
32
Name: Anonymous on Mar 25, 2008Comments: Load of crap. It's time non-football fans stop subsidising the rest hence I cancelled my sports channels when they announced hikes.Flag
- 33
- 34
-
35
Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008Comments: Content broadcasters have a responsibility to keep their services at affordable prices. Bidding against fellow competitors only guarantees that prices will escalate for the benefit of the content providers.Flag
- 36
- 37
- 38
-
39
Name: Jeffrey Tan on Mar 26, 2008Comments: It's all sports fans who suffer, not just the football watching groupFlag
-
40
Name: MARC HON DE-ZHI on Mar 26, 2008Comments: EUFA Champs League does not belong to MIO TV. Period.Flag
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
-
46
Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008Comments: Too much costs to incur for the love of the game.Give the rights back to Starhub.Flag
-
47
Name: Shirley on Mar 26, 2008Comments: i'm not a sport fan. But the never-ending price increase in all aspects of our daily life is simply outrageous.Flag
- 48
- 49
- 50
Page: 1, 2