Powered by iPetitions - start your online petition now

 

Signatures | Total: 899

 

# NameComments
351 AnonymousThis is correct! I'm glad to sign this petition!
352 Tanya Pettigrew
353 Zachary Biggs
354 Elysa AllisonThere are too many homeless pets - altering the existing animals and educating the owners is the only way to reduce the unwanted pet population effectively.
355 Joshua d'MarqueThis fund would save much more money both in the short term and the long run. We have enough and I'm sure there will be more private charities to house homeless animals rather than a government building for them. Give private groups the chance to better our community. This will also cut down on future red tape that will be generated by building the Lexington/Richland shared facility.
356 Sherri Mizell
357 Kim Rennert
358 Anonymous
359 Beverly G. Dickinson
360 RE DowUsing existing facilities spread all across Lexington & Richland counties makes more sense . I'm not so sure that people living far from Harbison would use this new facility.
361 Kathy flanaganI support spay and neutering proposal but also support any housing that can be available for strays. Please hear our voices.
362 Logan McCarrell
363 Julie Blanton
364 Julia Curtis
365 Happy Rodes
366 Karen BassoThere are too many unwanted pet animals now. If we can prevent more animals from being born, I support it!
367 Sharon HatchPlease vote YES for the spay/neuter program!
368 Paul MaySUPPORT PETS, INC!
369 Anonymous
370 katrina daniels
371 Donna Casamento
372 Cary Lafaye
373 DeborahThe Pets need our help with a home (does not need to be plush) until they can be adopted. People need to take care of their pets which includes spaying and neutering, a low cost spay/neuter would have to reduce the number of orphaned pets.
374 Anonymous
375 Anonymous
376 Donna Pelletier
377 Erin HudsonSpay and Neuter is the way to go!
378 Anonymous
379 Joan HudsonSpay and Neuter is the way to go!
380 Sandra Hayden
381 Annie Daye Danford
382 Ellen E. BettsThis problem will not be solved by one building, no matter how big it is. PET’s, INC. has years of experience in rescuing animals. They know how very, very fast animals multiply and how desperately hard it is to find permanent, responsible, loving homes for these animals. Please consider a plan that will stop the flow of new animals thrust into a world which is horribly cruel to unwanted pets instead of the feel-good plan that placates human sentimentality.
383 JOHN MATHENYIT MAKES MORE SENSE TO PUT THE MONEY TO USE WITH A SPAY/NEUTERING PROGRAM THAN TO WASTE MONEY ON A HIGH-END BUILDING. USE THIS MONEY WISELY AND SAVE MANY ANIMALS LIVES!
384 Verdie Sherer
385 Glena Parker
386 Glena Parker
387 Alethea K. SimsI feel that spaying/neutering animals is the best way to prevent so many unwanted animals from coming into our shelters and rescue groups. They are already overcrowded. Using the funding to spay/neuter these animals will prevent more overcrowding.
388 Shannon Hokanson
389 James Thompson
390 Rachel Coleman
391 R. ColemanMore services eliminate the need for more buildings.
392 Joyce L. RobbinsIf you use simple multiplication (one animal times the number of offspring it can produce), you realize immediately that building shelters is not the answer to animal overpopulation. Please use this money wisely for spaying and neutering.
393 Richard Wingard
394 Anonymous
395 Joey O'Brien
396 scott mcabee
397 Kim Baldwin
398 Patricia M. Flanagan
399 Anonymous
400 Becky Sharp

 

Signatures | Total: 899