Southwark Dog Lovers HOWL for Fair Play

Signatures 554 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 12 › »

1. 151
   Name: Kathy Wardley on Jun 10, 2007

   Comments: Yet again kneejerk responses to the few bad owners who spoil it for the majority. Prosecute the bad owners but do not spoil it for the many, many responsible owners. There are many people whose only company is their dog and whose only form of exercise and meeting other people for a chat is when they take their dogs for a run in the local park. Think of the damage to these people alone if you think of nothing else.

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Verena Fritz on Jun 10, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Lionel Fulton on Jun 10, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Sue Barrett on Jun 10, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Wendy Hassell on Jun 10, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Samantha Green on Jun 10, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Samantha Green on Jun 10, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Mark Green on Jun 10, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Aisling Green on Jun 10, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Sarah Dawson on Jun 10, 2007

    Comments: Education towards responsible ownership and training (for both dogs and owners) is whats needed.

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Margaret Murray on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Ivan Wells on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Victoria Davies on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: This new ruling is unnecessary and unfair.

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Chrissie Davis on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Myles Stinton on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Janet Hanton on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Myles Stinton on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: Please do not impose this blanket bahn on all dogs being allowed to run off the lead. It will be enormously detrimental to the health of my well behaved dog.

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Michael Whitty on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Roxanne Ridge on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: Some of the people in the park are far worse than dogs. Have you considered putting these on leads

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Cllr Jenny Jones AM on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Toni Bohn on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Anja Linke on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Kate Tierney on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: SALLY-ANNE WILLIAMS on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: This proposal in wholly unjust and unfair to the vast majority of responsible dog owners. The minority of irresponsible dog owners to whom this legislation is directed are unlikley to obey thenew laws in any case. As usual, it will be only the responsible, law-abiding citizen who is adversely impacted.

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: Yet another ill-thought out piece of proposed legislation, which is Draconian in its response and impacts only the law-abiding, responsible citizen. Another example of the 'if in doubt, ban it' culture we are increasingly iving under.

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Kate SIms on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Patricia Mcgreig on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: Another example of too many laws affecting the wrong people

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Peter Forrester on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Catherine McCloy on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Brian Towell on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: As a long-time dog owner and regular user of Peckham Rye, I can only endorse the above petition wholeheartedly. I would also suggest that, where possible and practical, large designated areas for non-dog lovers be considered, as I appreciate many people are (for their own reasons) quite afraid of dogs, and they have an equal right to enjoy Southwarks parks as those of us who wish to prpovide our dogs with adequate exercise and stimulus. Fair balance is all that's required, so all parties can feel they are not being persecuted.

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: I believe this is an infrigement of rights and cannot be tollerated. Will there be a ban on people and ball games in the future Absolutely obserd!!!!

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Julian Hirst on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: I fully support this petition

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Michaela Truscott on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Anna Burgess on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Natasha Vydra on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Carly Runeckles on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Clare Cutt on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: This is a ridiculous and unnecessary course of action, it would be far cheaper to police the antisocial dog owners than to end up policing all! It is unfair to punish the majority for the behaviour of the minority.

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Clare Cutt on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: This is a ridiculous and unnecessary course of action, it would be far cheaper to police the antisocial dog owners than to end up policing all! It is unfair to punish the majority for the behaviour of the minority.

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Christie Wyld on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: dog walkers are in the park every day and all weathers, by being there we make the parks safer and most dogs are under control and well behaved. Dogs need to have a space to be able to run and play freely, to be tethered to a lead at all times is cruel. It is a small minority of people who would whish to bring in such a law.

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Katy Fleet on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Margaret Slack on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: I no longer have a dog, but my husband and myself regularly walk my daughters dog. She is very well behaved and a happy sociable girl. She would go mad if not allowed to run, play and sniff around. She had a very bad start in life and we have made her into what she is today, giving her daily off lead excersise as part of her "recovery" . The dog control orders already in place are adequate enough. Don't punish the majority when the minority do wrong. There are already 8 areas in Peckham rye Park where dogs are not allowed full stop or have to be on lead. We don't need anymore dog free areas. When the footballers and picnickers are out, we are limited as to where we can walk as it is. We also appreciate that some people are not dog lovers and we do respect this and keep her under control, this is why we have the 8 areas already in place.

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Peter Slack on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: Yet another bad decision made by people who probably don't own a dog or use our park.

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Frances Ruddleston on Jun 11, 2007

    Comments: This is a fascist ruling which curbs the feedoms of the law abiding majority in order to control the actions of the criminal few. It is an attack on our human rights and a further move towards a sterile and soulless community, But above all it is completely and absolutely UNNECCESSARY!

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 12 › »