| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 401 | Daryl J. Davey | |
| 402 | Tom Simpson | |
| 403 | Jey Davis | South Wales Echo, if I go to any good book burnings organized by the clinically deluded and foolishly superstitious, I'll be sure to ask you to attend, (in your capacity of religious censor, of course). |
| 404 | Peter Dale | The teachings of the New Testament supersede those of the Old Testament otherwise what was the purpose of Christ's ministry? He did not condemn gays or homosexuality, did he? The Echo should be castigating those Christians who cannot even follow the teachings of their own founder, instead of appeasing their unfounded prejudices! |
| 405 | Marc Hill | Never give into bullies or they will just take more. |
| 406 | Anonymous | No comment; just disgust that any newspaper could be so spineless. |
| 407 | Michael Cox | |
| 408 | David Upton | |
| 409 | Dr Mark Barratt | The all-knowing, all-seeing and all-powerful creator of the universe should be able to take care of itself without puffed-up publicity-hungry religious nutters going out of their way to be offended by the tiniest perceived slights against it. Christian Voice do not behave like people who genuinely think they have God on their side. They behave like people who know they are involved in a precarious and ridiculous con job that must be protected at all costs, as the slightest criticism shows how vacuous the whole thing is. Newspapers shouldn't play along. |
| 410 | David Reid | The group who forced the apology has no qualms about offending others. Religous beliefs and actions such as homophobia must be able to be criticised in public forums. I was shocked that you took the article off your site and apologised to a small group such as Christian voice. I |
| 411 | Anonymous | I am disturbed and disappointed that a newspaper should effectively endorse the religious beliefs of an extremeist group by withdrawing this article. |
| 412 | Ian Winsor | |
| 413 | Susan D Campbell | Gee, we have the right never to be offended. Anything we disagree with should be labeled “hate speech” and those who hold those views should be promptly locked up or at least drawn and quartered. That way we’re sending a message that we, who dwell in the bosom of love, will not stand for being offended. |
| 414 | kevin bowles | Dont be afraid to speak/print the truth,its shamefull if you appease the dellusional. |
| 415 | C.J. Wilton | Journalism, spineless in the face of religion?! Why is it the exception to the rule?!! Get that article back where it belongs, and give O'Neil the credit he deserves! Stop going weak at the knees whenever some insane religious pressure group decides it doesn't like what its reading. |
| 416 | Grover Syck | |
| 417 | Graham Robertson | |
| 418 | Nick Waddell | The more people give in to Green and his bullying ilk, the more they are encouraged to press theri medeival views upon us.
btw, has this odious peice of filth coughed up for his unsuccessful court case against the BBC? |
| 419 | Will Taylor | Show some backbone! |
| 420 | Theodore Balkwill | |
| 421 | N Zalotockyj | A ludicrous & irresponsible editorial decision to apologise to one of the most persistently & belligerently offensive sectors of society. |
| 422 | Ziv Laurent | |
| 423 | Keith F. | Pulling this article is a disgrace to both journalistic integrity and freedom of speech. |
| 424 | Alex Barnett | |
| 425 | Avry | It's an utter disgrace that these horrible bigots made this paper cower in fear and apologize to them for speaking against their backwards views. |
| 426 | ben ollier | freedom of speech |
| 427 | Jared Mepsted | |
| 428 | Anonymous | Damn Christian extremists their essentially trying to be domestic terrorists. |
| 429 | Jacob | |
| 430 | Alex Strinka | |
| 431 | CN | Why not burn him for writing such a "heretical" column! Nothing written in this text was illegal in any way! |
| 432 | Dave Stanley | Believe anything you want but do not expect irrational beliefs to be free from criticism. |
| 433 | Tom Furnival | |
| 434 | Philip Byers | |
| 435 | spencer | |
| 436 | Anonymous | |
| 437 | Thomas | It's by far more of an outrage and hurtful to know they would even consider an apology to the christians. |
| 438 | Ian McKagan | This shit is silly. |
| 439 | Thorwald Peeters | Since when is querying a person on his views of a specific scenario blasphemous?
When it is perceived as a personal attack, it should so be objected to.
From what I read, the writer did nothing wrong. |
| 440 | marc walters | as i was an avid reader of the echo i have now decided not to read this horrible paper until dan is re employed to the web site |
| 441 | Steve | Free speech means just that, no pandering to religious bigots, especially "Christian Voice". |
| 442 | Steve Payne | |
| 443 | Brandy | Bowing to religious nutcases must stop. It is bad enough that churches have tax exemptions in some countries (the USA for one). |
| 444 | Robbie Bowman | Bloody religion... |
| 445 | Leonard Woodrow | |
| 446 | Billy | Isn't time they put Stephen Green in Prison for fraud? |
| 447 | Anonymous | I am shocked that the SWE should give into bigots! |
| 448 | Andrew Trimby | If the Echo was to attack Christianity then I think they could have done a much better job than the article in question.
The attack is on freedom of speech alone. I think it’s quite unacceptable that such a small group possess the power to censor our newspapers in this way.
Retract the apology and restore the website article immediately! |
| 449 | Anonymous | |
| 450 | Rebecca Allen | |