Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 117 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

  1. 51
    Name: Heike Ewert on Nov 26, 2005
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: Target would have a negative traffic impact on the area.
    Flag
  2. 52
    Name: Deborah Overfield on Jan 12, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: Alameda does not need a Target at Alameda Towne Centre (sic). The traffic coming across town will be unbearable. Soon no one will go to Target. We will be stuck with a huge monster of a building and parking structure.
    Flag
  3. 53
    Name: Paul Overfield on Jan 12, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: Please, no Target. No traffic snarl across town to get to it. Do not set us (the town) up for failure.
    Flag
  4. 54
    Name: Ani Dimusheva on Jan 12, 2006
    State:
    Country:
    Comments: Read Jerry Brown's plans for 3,000+ housing units on the Oakland side of the estuary. This is who Traget and the Megaplex are for
    Flag
  5. 55
    Name: Kathleen Zell on Jan 12, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 56
    Name: Jenny Onkka on Jan 12, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: The Safeway Store is ridiculous. It's almost obscene to have a food store that big. LOOK at those ceilings; all that wasted space. How much extra $$$ in energy for heat and air is THAT COSTING. First the Megaplex which we are fighting, Then the Safeway which we didn't have any say in. Well I really like TARGET but NOT at the expense of our precious community, our precious town.
    Flag
  7. 57
    Name: John Boeger on Jan 12, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 58
    Name: Josie Montoya on Jan 17, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: It is clear from the addition of the new, larger Safeway, that there is insufficient space for the number of vehicles developers hope to attract. The Planning Board should maintain the small town feel of the Southshore area and locate Target in a more appropriate area; one where extensive traffic won't create a hardship for residents.
    Flag
  9. 59
    Name: Linda Kibler on Jan 19, 2006
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 60
    Name: Adam Garfinkle on Jan 19, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 61
    Name: Suzanne Mikich-conway on Jan 21, 2006
    State: CA
    Country:
    Comments: Targets should be built off freeways not in towne centers.
    Flag
  12. 62
    Name: Fred Reid on Jan 22, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 63
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 23, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 64
    Name: Holly Sellers on Jan 24, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: I do not want a hugh store like Target at ATC. The developers are only doing what is best for them and not the people who live in Alameda.
    Flag
  15. 65
    Name: Brenda Benner on Jan 24, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: The surrounding streets cannot accomodate the traffic this store would generate. Since the opening of Trader Joe's and now the awfully huge Safeway, traffic has already become unbearable, frequently backing up from Park St. beyond Broadway and traffic accidents have noticably increased in the vacinity of Park Ave. and Otis. The amount of traffic on our adjacent dead-end street of Park Ave. (not Park St.!) has also steadily gotten much worse (including turn-arounds made with squealing tires, even hit and runs, as people get lost and get angry trying to find Park St., which tells me a lot of out-of-towners are traveling to this shopping center already. A much more appropriate place for the kind of store that is Target would be at Blanding, adjacent to the Fruitvale bridge.
    Flag
  16. 66
    Name: Margaret Powell on Jan 27, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: I live on the corner of Park Avenue and Otis. The traffic has increased considerably already due to the new Safeway. Their trucks actually shake our home! I do not want my real estate value diminish because of a discount store! This island is experiencing a flush of new money...why can't we get something nice, like a pottery barn I very much against the new Target.
    Flag
  17. 67
    Name: Megan Marshall on Jan 27, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 68
    Name: Michael Curtis on Jan 30, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: While I support better shopping opportunities in Alameda, I don't see a need for a large store in that location. It will significantly and negatively impact the surrounding neighborhoods,and increase an already overloaded infrastructure with auto and human traffic. Better to put regional stores on the other side of the island, where customers won't have to drive across the island on streets not set up for that kind of thoroughfare use.
    Flag
  19. 69
    Name: Noel Folsom on Jan 30, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: When the south Shore Center first opened, it was a vibrant shopping center. Since taking ove the center, the current owners have run it into the ground.
    Flag
  20. 70
    Name: Jenny Onkka on Jan 31, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 71
    Name: Kari Boeger on Feb 1, 2006
    State: CA
    Country:
    Comments: Reject this proposal from Harsch and limit any expansion to small boutique-type stores, similar in size to the existing stores.
    Flag
  22. 72
    Name: Rafal Szymczak on Feb 4, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 73
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 4, 2006
    State:
    Country: US
    Comments: I do not want a Target in Alameda.
    Flag
  24. 74
    Name: Hazel Uyvonne Martin on Feb 5, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: This area cannot maintain the traffic and problems that a Target would attract. Some people of Alameda may think where they live on the Island will protect them from the problems and property depreciation if this project is allowed to be built.
    Flag
  25. 75
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 10, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: We do not need a target store on Alameda. I agree that it will increase the traffic to a burdensome amount for our small and limited streets. Target has a number of locations in the Oakland area which would serve Oakland, the clientele that would visit a target store.
    Flag
  26. 76
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 13, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: The proposed Target would be directly across from my home. The traffic there is already extremely heavy, not helped by Trader Joe's and the new Safeway
    Flag
  27. 77
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 13, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: The extra cars and trucks driving down Broadway will only add extra noise and polution. We dont need anymore of either one!
    Flag
  28. 78
    Name: Julanne Alt on Feb 26, 2006
    State:
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 79
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 5, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 80
    Name: STEVEN DONG on Mar 11, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 81
    Name: Addison Slocum on Apr 4, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: Ther is absolutely no need for a store of this magnitude in this beautiful community of 70K. Why not just do what we do best and not try to be something that we are not. We REALLY need to replace 3 out of 5 members on our city council who pay absolutely no attention to the desires and wants of the electorate. Count me in to support in every way those who would run to unseat these arrogant few who are not listening to their constituents.
    Flag
  32. 82
    Name: Allison Krause on Apr 4, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 83
    Name: Clive Shephard on Aug 16, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: Target would be a disaster for this Small island City.
    Flag
  34. 84
    Name: Pat Payne on Aug 16, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 85
    Name: Barbara Morris on Aug 20, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: I am 100% against Target coming to Alameda. That goes for any othet big box stores.I will never shop in the huge new Walgreen's
    Flag
  36. 86
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 5, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 87
    Name: Maia Bradford on Sep 6, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 88
    Name: Kenneth Bagwell on Sep 6, 2006
    State:
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 89
    Name: Felicia Lipansky on Sep 8, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 90
    Name: Julie-ann Cesareo on Sep 9, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 91
    Name: Hee Jeong Matz on Sep 13, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 92
    Name: Ken Copen on Sep 24, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: My wife and I would like nothing more then to have a Target close by, but having it down in the South Shore Center would be a disaster. Our street Otis drive would become a speedway for traffic. Eight street, which is already fairly congested, would become undrivable. Going to the shopping center would become a nightmare. It's already unpleasant with the new Safeway and Trader Joes next to each other drawing heavy traffic. Put it over on the old base and it'd be worth consideration. The new theatre on Park Street is going to be bad enough. Let's stop the madness while we still can.
    Flag
  43. 93
    Name: Helen Vradelis on Sep 24, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: It is hard to understand the appeal of Target in the first place. I never shop there and would not if it was here. It would only keep me away from Southshore. All those people who want Alameda to be more like Walnut Creek (ick!) should move to Walnut Creek and leave us alone.
    Flag
  44. 94
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 25, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 95
    Name: Laura Epp on Oct 3, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 96
    Name: Dorothy Reid on Oct 6, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 97
    Name: Layne Vann on Oct 6, 2006
    State: CA
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 98
    Name: Barbara Coapman on Oct 7, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: Today, October 7, 2006, at 10:30AM traffic on Otis was backed up solid from Park Street to just past Versailles. And that is without a Target.
    Flag
  49. 99
    Name: Jill Reed on Nov 5, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: I vigorously oppose Target at Alameda Towne Centre. It is the WRONG site for a big box store.
    Flag
  50. 100
    Name: Lisa O'Driscoll on Nov 5, 2006
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3

Sign Petition Now!

Sponsored links